• smallest wired keyboard?

    From Eli the Bearded@3:770/3 to All on Wed Apr 13 23:11:22 2022
    XPost: comp.mobile.android

    (Note crosspost.)

    I've seen bluetooth keyboards about the size of a small TV remote:

    https://www.amazon.com/Miritz-Wireless-Keyboard-Touchpad-Control/dp/B01LZIIH24/

    That size is perfect, but I'd really prefer USB not bluetooth. USB just
    works, and bluetooth just has pairing issues so often. I'm not looking
    for "large enough to touchtype on" but I am looking for QWERTY and
    basic shell and vi keys.

    My usage would be for both Raspberry Pi and for Android. I did some web searches and found a ~4 year old forum post with a recomendation
    specifically for Pi use, but (a) that product is discontinued and (b) it
    was much larger anyway, more than twice as tall and twice as wide.

    Anyone know of such a thing at a not-too-outrageous price?

    Elijah
    ------
    might consider smaller keyboards, too

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Alan@3:770/3 to Andy Burnelli on Thu Apr 14 14:52:38 2022
    XPost: comp.mobile.android

    On 2022-04-14 2:10 p.m., Andy Burnelli wrote:
    nospam wrote:

    In article <t39qae$12jc$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Andy Burnelli
    <spam@nospam.com> wrote:


    Didn't nospam advocate for iPhone dongles to replace the missing
    aux port?

    no, nor has there ever been an 'aux port' to go missing.

    Semantics.

    nope.

    A GSM Arena search <https://www.gsmarena.com/search.php3?> calls it:
    "3.5mm jack"

    Which is not "aux port"...

    ...is it?

    :-)


    What do you want to call the "courageous" missing port then?

    analog headphone jack, which is not the same as an 'aux port'.

    A search shows 6,476 "courageous" phones that have the industry standard functionality of the 3.5mm jack which does many things which are
    _impossible_ do to without (just as an sd card does useful things which
    are impossible to do without).

    It's not an industry standard.


    This is a list of the phones that support the industry standard 3.5mm jack. <https://www.gsmarena.com/results.php3?chk35mm=selected>
    Unfortunately the laughably primitive latest iPhones aren't in that list.

    Deciding to provide a different solution isn't "primitive"


    Hell, there's not even a _single_ iPhone ever made with a modern battery.
    And modern functionality of a fast charger is missing from the iPhone box.
    So are the missing headphones which made Apple tens of billions of dollars!

    Nobody ever said Apple wasn't a MARKETING powerhouse of the finest order.

    One by one, Apple's strategy is to _cripple_ the laughably archaic iPhone.
    So that you're forced to buy back basic functionality Apple has removed.


    You mean there aren't Lightning earphones?

    And why did you advocate for dongles to replace that missing
    functionality?

    i didn't, mainly because there is no need for any dongle.

    Apple removed the basic industry standard functionality of a wired headset.

    No. They did not.

    If Apple hadn't removed the basic functionality, there wouldn't be the
    need.

    the headphones *in* *the* *box* plugged directly into the phone without
    needing anything extra.

    What headphones comes *in the box" with the latest iPhones, nospam?

    None. What of it?

    Do all Android phones come with headphones?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Jan Panteltje@3:770/3 to scharf.steven@geemail.com on Sun Apr 17 06:27:16 2022
    XPost: comp.mobile.android

    On a sunny day (Sat, 16 Apr 2022 18:05:03 -0700) it happened sms <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote in <t3fp41$8sm$1@dont-email.me>:

    On 4/16/2022 1:40 PM, meff wrote:
    On 2022-04-16, Ahem A Rivet's Shot <steveo@eircom.net> wrote:
    Parallel ports are still used as control interfaces to small CNC >>> machines in preference to USB because they provide better real time
    control. Old computers with parallel ports command a surprising premium
    because of this.

    Yeah I'm fully aware that there are situations that parallel ports
    make more sense, and latency is a big one. Same with Serial ports as
    there's no bring-up or negotiation process required along the port
    (and if you can drive the serial port faster than the parallel port,
    then it could potentially have higher throughput.) But not for most
    consumer usecases.

    It's become harder to directly read from, and write to, the parallel
    port when using Windows versions beginning with Windows 7, as well as
    more difficult because the I/O addresses are no longer the legacy ISA >parallel port addresses. Of course you can still use MS-DOS or FreeDOS
    if you're doing embedded systems control through the parallel port.

    Linux
    I have a Microchip PIC programmer connected to the PC parport,
    the hardware design is from this person:
    http://www.covingtoninnovations.com/noppp/
    just modified it a bit,
    and I wrote software for it.
    No problem addressing the port
    http://panteltje.com/panteltje/pic/jppp18/index.html

    Also made a Raspberry version using GPIO:
    http://panteltje.com/panteltje/raspberry_pi_noppp/
    Just got some parts in to put it all on one small board,

    No problem changing code from partport ot GPIO
    But as PCs were getting faster and faster I had to add a delay loop command line option else the PIC could not keep up.



    Not sure how this thread went from wired keyboards to 3.5mm audio jacks
    (when did 1/8" audio jacks become 3.5mm jacks?).

    :-)

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Jan Panteltje@3:770/3 to nospam@nospam.invalid on Sun Apr 17 06:41:52 2022
    XPost: comp.mobile.android

    On a sunny day (Sun, 17 Apr 2022 00:06:09 -0400) it happened nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote in <170420220006097968%nospam@nospam.invalid>:

    In article <t3fg8q$mum$1@dont-email.me>, sms
    <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote:


    The 3.5mm connector was used for a wide variety of devices that plugged
    into a phone, devices that needed only a low-speed interface with
    minimal power. Since it was on every phone, and there were no royalties
    associated with it, it became the de facto "universal interface" for
    both iPhones and Android phones.

    Some of the devices were:
    € High quality microphones when doing video recording
    € Light meters
    € IR Blasters
    € Credit card readers (Square originally used the headphone jack)
    € Amplified high-quality speakers
    € Breathalyzer
    € Laser Pointer
    € Level
    € Thermometer
    € FM Radio Antenna (for Android)

    all of those can be done more easily, more reliably and with more >functionality by using lightning or usb-c, and in some cases,
    bluetooth.

    And of course the 3.5mm headphone jack provides better quality audio
    than Bluetooth,

    it does not.

    the limiting factor is the transducer itself, not the connection method.

    That is not correct.
    In my experience wireless links (bluetooth or whatever) are not very reliable. Same for wireless keyboards, sometimes mine is obstructed by stuff on the table that I then have to move,
    A direct connection will always be better no matter the RF protocol.

    Also I do not like bluetooth headsets I want no RF next to my head for long times,



    though the Lightning to 3.5mm and USB to 3.5mm dongles
    are just as good, it's just that the D/A and A/D are duplicated in the
    dongle. It's just an annoyance to have to buy and carry along one extra
    item.

    then get usb-c or lightning headphones, such as the ones that were
    included in the box of the iphone you supposedly have.

    The small earbuds normally have a 90 degrees angled connector and do not have that 'lever'
    sort of thing that can break the connector.
    ================{ ]
    ||
    ||
    0
    And the waterproof argument is a bit far fetched listen with phone upside down in the shower?
    Dive with it listening underwater to the earplugs?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Ahem A Rivet's Shot@3:770/3 to The Natural Philosopher on Tue Apr 19 12:01:22 2022
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On Tue, 19 Apr 2022 11:18:11 +0100
    The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> wrote:

    Whenever you detect a potential emotional bias to a narrative, the implication that those not 'with it' are incurable Neanderthals, an/or research that implies that '97% of everybody who counts believes in it'
    you may be sure its snake oil...

    Occasionally it is someone using the tried and tested techniques to sell something good - but usually success will convert the good product
    into cheaper-to-produce-snake-oil once money takes control so these
    examples are short lived but often to be found in the early history of the
    best snake oil providers.

    It occurs to me that there are uncomfortable parallels in this
    approach to Goerring's "voice or no voice, the people can always be brought
    to the bidding of the leaders. That is easy. All you have to do is tell
    them they are being attacked and denounce the pacifists for lack of
    patriotism and exposing the country to danger. It works the same way in any country.”. Also to Sun Tzu's lengthy observations.

    --
    Steve O'Hara-Smith
    Odds and Ends at http://www.sohara.org/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Andy Burnelli@3:770/3 to nospam on Wed Apr 20 02:23:56 2022
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    nospam wrote:

    Dude. Then explain this message if Apple doesn't _require_ periodic login: >> <https://i.postimg.cc/nrFHSvby/appleid11.jpg>

    what part of 'sign in again' is not clear?

    The point on that iPad is that Apple _requires_ periodic sign in, nospam.
    Do you finally agree to that which I've been telling you for years now?

    The difference here is:
    Apple requires you to sign into the mothership periodically; Google can't.

    All you low-IQ morons deny that fact simply because you _hate_ that fact.

    nothing has been disabled.

    if it had, you wouldn't have been able to get anywhere near that far.

    I have _multiple_ iPads, nospam, where I've been running the tests.
    That you don't comprehend that after all these years is worrisome.

    enter your apple id (likely autofilled) and the password, and it will
    update whatever it needs to update.

    Nope. Not gonna do it. The iPad is a toy that I simply use to learn on.
    What I'm learning is that Apple _requires_ periodic login.

    You denied that.
    And yet, you were wrong.

    Do you finally agree that Apple _requires_ periodic login nospam?
    --
    Apple requires you to sign into the mothership periodically; Google can't.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From nospam@3:770/3 to spam@nospam.com on Tue Apr 19 21:34:48 2022
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    In article <t3nmik$84h$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Andy Burnelli
    <spam@nospam.com> wrote:


    One nice thing for hex coding was that the memory order made sense
    (compared to that of the Intel MPUs).

    yet you don't know the proper terminology, known as little-endian and big-endian, and you also don't know that the power pc supported both.

    I wrote assembly code, nospam, for both the IBM (oh, what was it... 1130?... that was a loooong time ago, actually, I think it was the 1130 and then the 370 which was a much bigger machine -

    bullshit. you can't even get android sample code working and you expect
    people to believe you wrote assembly?

    but anyway - of course I know about
    little endian and big endian memory addressing).

    then why didn't you use the correct terminology?


    Hell... I even have the assembly language books to prove it! :)

    of course you do, and along with the book on vacuum tubes, you were
    able to write software for a vacuum tube computer.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From nospam@3:770/3 to spam@nospam.com on Tue Apr 19 21:34:48 2022
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    In article <t3nnau$eb4$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Andy Burnelli
    <spam@nospam.com> wrote:


    The point on that iPad is that Apple _requires_ periodic sign in, nospam.

    it does not.



    The iPad is a toy that I simply use to learn on.

    that plan is not working out the way you might have hoped.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Andy Burnelli@3:770/3 to Jolly Roger on Wed Apr 20 02:26:48 2022
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    Jolly Roger wrote:

    Still rocking my 1st gen iPad, iPhone 4, and so on here. Arlen's a
    clueless idiot who locks himself out of his own devices just so he can
    turn around and troll the Apple newsgroups with bullshit fabricated
    stories.

    The fact remains that I tested what you low-IQ morons denied for years.
    <https://i.postimg.cc/LXzB3Lc0/appleid01.jpg>

    Apple requires you to periodically sign into the mothership; Google can't.
    <https://i.postimg.cc/nrFHSvby/appleid11.jpg>

    The reason you low-IQ iKooks deny these facts is because you _hate_ them.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Andy Burnelli@3:770/3 to nospam on Wed Apr 20 02:43:56 2022
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    nospam wrote:

    Try learning to read

    take your own advice.

    you are mindlessly blaming apple for the actions of ad tracking
    companies, who ignored the user's choice to not be tracked and tracked
    them anyway.

    I agree with Jan Panteltje that nospam needs to learn how to read.
    They explicitly blamed Apple in multiple ways.

    What I said would happen _always_ happens with these low-IQ iKooks.
    They brazenly _deny_ any fact you post _without_ even reading it.

    Why?
    I don't know why.

    I suspect they _hate_ what Apple is so they deny what Apple does.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Andy Burnelli@3:770/3 to Jan Panteltje on Wed Apr 20 02:38:50 2022
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    Jan Panteltje wrote:

    And from the news TODAY:
    https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2022/04/a-year-after-apple-enforces-app-tracking-policy-covert-ios-tracking-remains/

    í°ŞGoodbye Tracking? Impact of iOS App Tracking Transparency and Privacy Labels*
    <https://arxiv.org/pdf/2204.03556.pdf>
    "Our findings suggest that tracking companies, especially larger ones
    with access to large troves of first party, still track users behind
    the scenes. They can do this through a range of methods, including using
    IP addresses to link installation-specific IDs across apps and through
    the sign-in functionality provided by individual apps (e.g. Google
    or Facebook sign-in, or email address). Especially in combination
    with further user and device characteristics, which our data confirmed
    are still widely collected by tracking companies, it would be possible
    to analyse user behaviour across apps and websites (i.e. fingerprinting
    and cohort tracking). A direct result of the ATT could therefore be
    that existing power imbalances in the digital tracking ecosystem get reinforced.

    We even found a real-world example of Umeng, a subsidiary of the
    Chinese tech company Alibaba, using their server-side code to provide
    apps with a fingerprinting-derived cross-app identifier...
    The use of fingerprinting is in violation of Apple's policies,
    and raises questions around to what extent the company is able to
    enforce its policies. ATT might ultimately encourage a shift of
    tracking technologies behind the scenes, so that they are outside of
    Apple's reach. In other words, Apple's new rules might lead to even
    less transparency around tracking than we currently have, including
    for academic researchers."

    Thanks for that news story as the low-IQ iKooks _hate_ anything that bursts their self-esteem bubble when it shows what Apple _really_ is in the flesh. í° *Apple's landmark App Tracking Transparency may not be as tough as some people think.(
    í°  <https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2022/04/a-year-after-apple-enforces-app-tracking-policy-covert-ios-tracking-remains/>
    "On average, the research found, apps that claimed they didn't collect
    user data nonetheless contained 1.8 tracking libraries and contacted
    2.5 tracking companies. Of apps that used SKAdNetwork, Google Firebase
    Analytics, and Google Crashlytics, more than half failed to disclose
    having access to user data. The Facebook SDK fared slightly better
    with about a 47 percent failure rate."

    Unlike the low-IQ iKooks, I'll not only click on the reference, and I'll
    _read_ the reference, but I'll also _understand_ what it informs us.

    "Research published last week suggests that ATT, as it's usually
    abbreviated, doesn't always curb the surreptitious collection of
    personal data or the fingerprinting of users...

    Loopholes in the framework also provided the opportunity for companies,
    particularly large ones like Google and Facebook, to work around the
    protections and stockpile even more data. The paper warned that despite
    Apple's promise for more transparency, ATT might give many users a
    false sense of security..."

    The researchers also found Apple to be lax in enforcing their own rules.
    "The researchers identified nine iOS apps that used server-side code
    to generate a mutual user identifier that a subsidiary of the Chinese
    tech company Alibaba can use for cross-app tracking. "The sharing of
    device information for purposes of fingerprinting would be in
    violation of Apple's policies" [had Apple done any testing, that is]

    What's potentially worse is this observation in that article:
    "Apple isn't required to follow the policy in many cases, making it
    possible for Apple to further add to the stockpile of data it collects.

    But worse than that still...
    "They noted that Apple also exempts tracking for purposes of "obtaining
    information on a consumer's creditworthiness for the specific purpose
    of making a credit determination."

    WTF? What's that about?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Jolly Roger@3:770/3 to Andy Burnelli on Wed Apr 20 01:46:36 2022
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2022-04-20, Andy Burnelli <spam@nospam.com> wrote:
    Jolly Roger wrote:

    Still rocking my 1st gen iPad, iPhone 4, and so on here. Arlen's a
    clueless idiot who locks himself out of his own devices just so he can
    turn around and troll the Apple newsgroups with bullshit fabricated
    stories.

    The fact remains that I tested what you low-IQ morons denied for years. <https://i.postimg.cc/LXzB3Lc0/appleid01.jpg>

    Arlen desperately wants you to ignore the "Not Now" button in the above screenshot - just like he wants you to think that clicking that button
    will supposedly result in your device suddenly bricking itself for no
    reason. He's such a lazy troll. : )

    Apple requires you to periodically sign into the mothership; Google can't. <https://i.postimg.cc/nrFHSvby/appleid11.jpg>

    Arlen desperately wants you to ignore the fact that he had to dig deep
    down into Settings to find that message - a message he could ignore if
    he wanted to, but doesn't, because: troll. He's a lazy, old fool. ; )

    The reason you low-IQ iKooks deny these facts is because you _hate_ them.

    Notice how he hasn't stated a single fact in this thread. All Arlen has
    are shitty opinions and lame insults. ; )

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Andy Burnelli@3:770/3 to nospam on Wed Apr 20 02:48:16 2022
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    nospam wrote:

    The fact that you can't make an iOS browser private

    it's private by design.

    I've never met people in the flesh who still believed in the Easter Bunny.
    But you low-IQ iKooks believe in all imaginary things marketing tells you.

    Apple tells you it's "private by design" in their glossy marketing ads.
    And you believe it.

    Nobody intelligent believes it.
    But you do.

    Worse, you deny all facts that show what Apple is and what Apple does.

    Why?
    I don't know why.

    I suspect you hate that what Apple is, isn't at all what Apple says it is.
    --
    I don't care iKooks are child-like with a low-IQ, no education & low self esteem; but due to that, they're so upset that Apple always lies to them.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Andy Burnelli@3:770/3 to nospam on Wed Apr 20 02:51:22 2022
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    nospam wrote:

    fm radio is almost never used on a phone for a number of reasons,

    What's consistent about you are your inconsistent myriad excuses for what
    is, in effect, always an almost complete lack of basic iPhone functionality.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Andy Burnelli@3:770/3 to nospam on Wed Apr 20 02:54:56 2022
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    nospam wrote:

    smartphone apps can receive many hundreds if not thousands of fm radio stations from anywhere in the world, along with many other sources, and without the need to use headphones.

    What nospam is always doing is creating myriad excuses for the lack of basic functionality in the iPhone even when his excuses can't hold water because
    if you _need_ a real FM radio, you're not likely to have good Internet.

    But it doesn't matter _which_ excuse nospam panders to us, because in the
    end two things are always the same with _all_ of nospam's myriad excuses.

    1. Apple iPhones lack the basic functionality that most phones have
    2. Hence, nospam claims that nobody ever needs basic functionality

    Why?
    I don't know why.

    I suspect nospam _hates_ that Apple never is what Apple says it is.
    --
    I don't care iKooks are child-like with a low-IQ, no education & low self esteem; but due to that, they're so upset that Apple always lies to them.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Andy Burnelli@3:770/3 to nospam on Wed Apr 20 03:04:46 2022
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    nospam wrote:

    Since no iPhone ever had FM radio...

    Really?

    really. nor do almost all android phones as well as feature phones.
    it's not something that is in any demand, let alone high demand.

    Why does nospam brazenly deny what _nobody_ intelligent would deny?
    Could it be that nospam _hates_ that the iPhone lacks basic functionality?

    Like Dunning & Kruger wondered about the brain of the lemon-juice bank
    robber, I wonder why kind of "adult?" thinks the Easter Bunny is real?

    This nospam is one of those low-IQ people who believe in fantasies.
    We covered the number of phones with FM radio many times.

    This nospam can't learn something as simple as a fact.
    Why?

    I don't know why.

    I suspect nospam _hates_ that the iPhone doesn't have even the most basic functionality so nospam claims that nobody wants it even as 59% of all
    phones made in the last five years have this standard basic functionality.
    --
    <https://www.gsmarena.com/search.php3?nYearMin=2019&sAvailabilities=1>
    2204 phones <https://www.gsmarena.com/results.php3?nYearMin=2018&chkFMradio=selected&sAvailabilities=1,2>
    1301

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Andy Burnelli@3:770/3 to Jan Panteltje on Wed Apr 20 03:13:32 2022
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    Jan Panteltje wrote:

    really. nor do almost all android phones as well as feature phones.
    it's not something that is in any demand, let alone high demand.

    Bullshit
    Go away

    Jan,
    The fact is that 61% of the Android phones out there have the FM radio.
    Hence, you're realizing something that is _consistent_ with these iKooks.

    First, the fact is that their beloved iPhone lacks basic functionality.
    (It doesn't matter which functionality by the way, but it's FM for now.)

    Then, the iKooks, whose entire self esteem is wrapped inextricably
    intertwined with Apple marketing promises of superiority, _hate_ that fact.

    The iKooks own an imaginary belief system that defies all logic & reason. Hence, facts are a _danger_ to all of these iKooks.

    The fact is almost sixty percent of phones made today have the FM radio.
    And yet, nospam will claim sixty percent is almost none.

    When you remove Apple from that equation, it's even worse for nospam:
    Of 2048 Android phones made in the past five years, 1248 have FM radios.

    That's 61% of all Android phones in use today have the FM radio.
    Out of them, it's _zero_ iPhones that have this basic functionality.

    One thing you'll note is that it doesn't matter _what_ the functionality is that the iPhone lacks (whether it's an sdlot, a charger, a 3.5mm jack, a
    modern sized battery, or an FM radio), the iKooks _hate_ that their beloved iPhone lacks even these, the most basic of common standard functionalities.

    So... they make up their own imaginary belief system that assumes nobody
    wants them, even though _most_ phones have these basic functionalities.

    In essence, their excuses are the same because the problem is the same.
    The iPhone _always_ lacks basic hardware & software functionality.

    That's what they hate about these facts.
    They have no _adult_ defense to these facts.
    Just watch.
    --
    You can't make those ungodly profits off of an intelligent customer base.

    REFERENCE <https://www.gsmarena.com/search.php3?nYearMin=2018&sAvailabilities=1,2&sOSes=2>
    https://www.gsmarena.com/search.php3?nYearMin=2018&chkFMradio=selected&sAvailabilities=1,2&sOSes=2

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Andy Burnelli@3:770/3 to nospam on Wed Apr 20 03:26:14 2022
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    nospam wrote:

    the opposite, where there's cellular service but little to no
    terrestrial radio, is far more common, especially in the obscure places
    you keep citing about verizon's supposedly fantastic coverage.

    The fact is clear that the iPhone always lacks basic functionality.

    All of nospam's excuses are simply a red herring since that fact remains.

    What nospam will do is concoct myriad excuses for _why_ his beloved iPhone lacks the most basic of standard functionality...

    *But the fact always remains that the iPhone lacks basic functionality.*

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Andy Burnelli@3:770/3 to Adrian on Wed Apr 20 03:23:44 2022
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    Adrian wrote:

    I just tried my Galaxy A5,and that worked as an FM radio (with data and
    WiFi turned off). Not brilliant, but better than nothing. The
    earphone/mic lead also acts as the aerial.

    Well, it's basic functionality after all.

    What the iPhone always lacks is basic hardware & software functionality.

    What the iKooks _hate_ is that the iPhone always lacks basic functionality.

    So, they claim that nobody wants any basic functionality.

    Even though _most phones_ have this basic functionality.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Andy Burnelli@3:770/3 to The Natural Philosopher on Wed Apr 20 03:21:02 2022
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    The Natural Philosopher wrote:

    And while a good many phones do have FM as a feature, I would be a lot
    of money that most people never use it or are even aware of it.

    Do they? I couldn't find a single example

    61% of Android phones made in the last five years have the FM radio functionality but _zero_ percent of the iPhone has this functionality.

    As always, the iPhone lacks basic functionality (both hardware & software).

    That's why you'll always see the iKooks claim nobody needs basic
    functionality (it's only because they _hate_ they don't have it).

    Doesn't matter if it's the sdslot, or the charger, or the fast charger, or
    the bigger battery, or the 3.5mm jack, or the removable battery, or the
    almost total lack of software utilities - it's always the same issue.

    a. *The iPhone lacks basic hardware & software functionality*
    b. They _hate_ that the iPhone lacks all this basic functionality
    c. So they deny that anyone would ever want any basic functionality

    Just watch.
    (You can predict them years in advance.)
    -- <https://www.gsmarena.com/search.php3?nYearMin=2018&sAvailabilities=1,2&sOSes=2>
    <https://www.gsmarena.com/search.php3?nYearMin=2018&chkFMradio=selected&sAvailabilities=1,2&sOSes=2>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Andy Burnelli@3:770/3 to sms on Wed Apr 20 03:31:58 2022
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    sms wrote:

    There's an Android OTG USB-C adapter for receiving ATSC digital TV
    broadcasts on Android phones and tablets. See <https://www.amazon.com/dp/B07GPB6VFX>. It comes with two antennas.

    Bear in mind you can _mirror_ your android phone onto your PC monitor
    (once you get that TV signal, for example, on your Android phone)

    To mirror Android on Windows over USB:
    adb devices
    scrcpy
    Both commands are in this zip file <https://github.com/Genymobile/scrcpy>

    To mirror Android on Windows over Wi-Fi:
    adb connect 192.168.0.2:5555
    scrcpy
    Where the "192.168.0.2" is the IP address of your phone on your LAN.

    To take a movie of the entire session (on either USB or over Wi-Fi):
    scrcpy --record foo.mp4
    scrcpy -r bar.mkv

    There is an option to rotate sideways and to fill the monitor screen.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Andy Burnelli@3:770/3 to nospam on Wed Apr 20 03:41:04 2022
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    nospam wrote:

    The point on that iPad is that Apple _requires_ periodic sign in, nospam.

    it does not.

    Then what's this?
    <https://i.postimg.cc/nrFHSvby/appleid11.jpg>

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Andy Burnelli@3:770/3 to nospam on Wed Apr 20 03:40:14 2022
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    nospam wrote:

    bullshit. you can't even get android sample code working and you expect people to believe you wrote assembly?

    You're an idiot. Writing assembly language code is completely different than writing in Java and the fact you don't know that proves my point about you.

    but anyway - of course I know about
    little endian and big endian memory addressing).

    then why didn't you use the correct terminology?

    Your lack of education is why you think everyone has to speak only in terms that you are cognizant of, particularly in a hastily written informal post.

    Hell... I even have the assembly language books to prove it! :)

    of course you do, and along with the book on vacuum tubes, you were
    able to write software for a vacuum tube computer.

    The fact remains that you _hate_ that you have no education nospam.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Andy Burnelli@3:770/3 to Jolly Roger on Wed Apr 20 03:46:42 2022
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    Jolly Roger wrote:

    The fact remains that I tested what you low-IQ morons denied for years.
    <https://i.postimg.cc/LXzB3Lc0/appleid01.jpg>

    Arlen desperately wants you to ignore the "Not Now" button in the above screenshot - just like he wants you to think that clicking that button
    will supposedly result in your device suddenly bricking itself for no
    reason. He's such a lazy troll. : )

    Hehhehheh... Every time Jolly Roger is confronted with a fact he hates
    (which is a lot of times), he calls _all_ facts, trolls.

    Why?
    I don't know why.

    I suspect he _hates_ that it's correct that Apple requires that login periodically to the mothership, to the point that the iOS device will nag
    you every day all day - because what I said is true.

    Apple requires _periodic_ logging into the mothership; Google can't.
    <https://i.postimg.cc/nrFHSvby/appleid11.jpg>

    Apple requires you to periodically sign into the mothership; Google can't. >> <https://i.postimg.cc/nrFHSvby/appleid11.jpg>

    Arlen desperately wants you to ignore the fact that he had to dig deep
    down into Settings to find that message - a message he could ignore if
    he wanted to, but doesn't, because: troll. He's a lazy, old fool. ; )

    What's amazing is that these iKooks don't realize these messages happen
    _every_ single time you open the iPad up - which is every single day.

    And they're right there on the home screen - but the iKooks have to deny
    that fact because they _hate_ that it is a fact indeed.
    <https://i.postimg.cc/LXzB3Lc0/appleid01.jpg>]

    The reason you low-IQ iKooks deny these facts is because you _hate_ them.

    Notice how he hasn't stated a single fact in this thread. All Arlen has
    are shitty opinions and lame insults. ; )

    The intelligent people will note I supplied screenshots which are the facts. And they'll also note the iKooks _deny_ the existence of those facts.

    Why?
    I don't know why.

    I suspect the iKooks _hate_ that Apple never is what Apple fed them to
    believe it was.

    The iKooks own an entirely imaginary belief system that is destroyed by
    facts; so... they simply deny that the facts even exist.

    And yet... they do.
    <https://i.postimg.cc/LXzB3Lc0/appleid01.jpg> Apple _forces_ a log in!
    <https://i.postimg.cc/g008YhxP/appleid02.jpg> Apple _forces_ a lock out!
    <https://i.postimg.cc/q75t7MSk/appleid03.jpg> Apple _disables_ your acct!
    <https://i.postimg.cc/8zSvshQf/appleid04.jpg> Apple _locks_ you out!
    <https://i.postimg.cc/SKGfmgnK/appleid05.jpg> Apple won't let you back in!

    <https://i.postimg.cc/ZR5mZ287/appleid07.jpg> Apple fails App Store test
    <https://i.postimg.cc/TwN6P0QR/appleid08.jpg> Only Apple requires a login
    <https://i.postimg.cc/8k3GQyj4/appleid09.jpg> Apple tracks your activity
    <https://i.postimg.cc/hhFNJ5mq/appleid010.jpg> Apps become non functional
    <https://i.postimg.cc/nrFHSvby/appleid11.jpg> Apple _forces_ extra logins!
    <https://i.postimg.cc/Y9kkj19v/appleid12.jpg> Apple tracking server login

    <https://i.postimg.cc/gj0r2cBP/osupdate01.jpg> iOS 13.5 to iOS 15.3.1
    <https://i.postimg.cc/sfZ0XP71/osupdate02.jpg> Deleting Siri stuff works
    <https://i.postimg.cc/nLjqk2HD/osupdate03.jpg> Even iOS updates work
    <https://i.postimg.cc/bJPKDSZ1/osupdate04.jpg> Can't download an app twice
    <https://i.postimg.cc/Gt39Q7Pp/osupdate05.jpg> iCloud TOC is again accepted

    <https://i.postimg.cc/hvCnqdj4/trust01.jpg> 9:35PM PC trust established
    <https://i.postimg.cc/qMzV3gqn/trust02.jpg> 9:36PM PC trust required again! All that simply because I refused to be locked inside the walled garden.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Hank Rogers@3:770/3 to Jolly Roger on Tue Apr 19 21:47:16 2022
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    Jolly Roger wrote:
    On 2022-04-20, Andy Burnelli <spam@nospam.com> wrote:
    Jolly Roger wrote:

    Still rocking my 1st gen iPad, iPhone 4, and so on here. Arlen's a
    clueless idiot who locks himself out of his own devices just so he can
    turn around and troll the Apple newsgroups with bullshit fabricated
    stories.

    The fact remains that I tested what you low-IQ morons denied for years.
    <https://i.postimg.cc/LXzB3Lc0/appleid01.jpg>

    Arlen desperately wants you to ignore the "Not Now" button in the above screenshot - just like he wants you to think that clicking that button
    will supposedly result in your device suddenly bricking itself for no
    reason. He's such a lazy troll. : )

    Apple requires you to periodically sign into the mothership; Google can't. >> <https://i.postimg.cc/nrFHSvby/appleid11.jpg>

    Arlen desperately wants you to ignore the fact that he had to dig deep
    down into Settings to find that message - a message he could ignore if
    he wanted to, but doesn't, because: troll. He's a lazy, old fool. ; )

    The reason you low-IQ iKooks deny these facts is because you _hate_ them.

    Notice how he hasn't stated a single fact in this thread. All Arlen has
    are shitty opinions and lame insults. ; )


    Well, maybe so, but he's always good for a laff.

    Relax. Don't take him so seriously.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Andy Burnelli@3:770/3 to nospam on Wed Apr 20 04:06:52 2022
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    nospam wrote:

    the primary reason was to encourage the purchase of AirPods.

    that is absolutely false.

    Especially considering Apple included a set of Lightning headphones in
    the box at the time. : )

    *and* they included a lightning adapter.

    it's hard to encourage buying something new when *two* solutions are
    provided in the box.

    What did they provide in the box for the last set of 190 million iPhone 12
    and iPhone 13 sold so far, nospam?

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Andy Burnelli@3:770/3 to Jolly Roger on Wed Apr 20 04:08:34 2022
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    Jolly Roger wrote:

    It's a red herring to discuss the pros and cons since the reason
    Apple removed the industry standard 3.5 mm jack was to make you buy
    it back.

    Incorrect.

    Yes, he is incorrect. the primary reason was to encourage the purchase
    of AirPods.

    Just because you say so? Nah. No sale, sorry.

    Apple saved 6.5 billion dollars alone, and made many billions more JR.

    <https://screenrant.com/apple-saved-billions-removing-chargers-boxes/>
    <https://www.gizmochina.com/2022/03/14/apple-reportedly-6-billion-removing-charger-earpods-box/>
    <https://www.phonearena.com/news/apple-saved-billions-removing-accessories-from-boxes_id139005>
    <https://techstory.in/apple-reportedly-saved-in-billions-with-removing-chargers-earpods-from-box/>
    <https://tech.hindustantimes.com/mobile/news/how-much-apple-saved-by-removing-charger-earpods-from-iphone-12-box-71610289652370.html>

    I guess facts don't play any role in the iKook's imaginary belief systems.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Andy Burnelli@3:770/3 to Hank Rogers on Wed Apr 20 04:11:50 2022
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    Hank Rogers wrote:

    Well, maybe so, but he's always good for a laff.

    I'm going to give you one more of these kindergarten no-content completely childish always non technical responses before I plonk you "Hank Rogers".

    One more. And then plonk. No warning. Just plonk.

    If you can't ever contribute as an adult to the actual topic, then plonking
    you _improves_ the value of the conversation here on this newsgroup.

    One more.
    Then plonk.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Lewis@3:770/3 to Jolly Roger on Wed Apr 20 03:11:12 2022
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    In message <jc96vsFfi7kU1@mid.individual.net> Jolly Roger <jollyroger@pobox.com> wrote:
    Notice how he hasn't stated a single fact in this thread.

    This thread? Has the shitbag ever stated a single fact in any thread?

    --
    I'm from a predominately black family --Eddie Murphy

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Andy Burnelli@3:770/3 to Lewis on Wed Apr 20 04:17:08 2022
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    Lewis wrote:

    Has the shitbag ever stated a single fact in any thread?

    Before I said the iKooks in this thread were:
    a. Alan Baker (everyone has him plonked as he cannot add value)
    b. nospam (most people keep him as he "can" add value
    c. Jolly Roger (filled with kindergarten hateful vitriol)

    And now, we have Jolly Roger's twin in kindergarten hate-filled vitriol:
    d. Lewis

    For those who don't know, Lewis & Jolly Roger _hate_ every fact about Apple because the facts _hurt_ them deeply since they _believe_ everything Apple
    told them.

    I liken both of them to the fifth grade bully who was held back a few years, when someone who is years younger in the same grade tells him Santa isn't
    real.

    Lewis: Santa exists. He's gonna give me an iPhone for Christmas.
    Child: That's just a marketing gimmick. Your parents are Santa.

    Lewis. No. I hate you! He exists! I saw him on an Apple advertisement.
    Child: That's how marketing works, Lewis. Don't believe Apple ads.

    Lewis: Liar! Liar! Pants on fire! Apple said it. It must be true!

    What Jolly Roger does is call all facts trolls; and what Lewis does is call
    all people who tell them facts, "shitbags". Just watch.

    You can ask _why_ facts are so scary to these people but if you understand
    the Santa analogy, the fact alone _destroys_ their cuddly belief systems.

    They not only hate the facts - but they hate the mere messenger of facts.
    Just watch.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Andy Burnelli@3:770/3 to The Natural Philosopher on Wed Apr 20 04:41:36 2022
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    The Natural Philosopher wrote:

    Its not 'as if', it *is*.

    You seem to be able to see things like they truly are.

    I agree with you that the iKooks (Jolly Roger, nospam, Alan Baker, et. al),
    own completly imaginary belief systems fed to them directly by Apple.

    They are _desperate_ to maintain those imaginary belief systems.
    The problem is that facts instantly _destroy_ imaginary belief systems.

    Unless.... ... ... ... ...

    Unless they _deny_ that the facts exist.
    Then... ... ... ... ...

    Then they can maintain their imaginary belief systems intact.

    We all know these sorts of people. They dint know how to verify any
    knowledge for themselves so their validation consists in choosing who to believe.
    My dear sister even said that 'well it depends which websites you believe'

    You understand them well.

    They believe _everything_ Apple feeds them to believe.
    It never occurs to them that the narrative is the same.

    For example, Apple fed them that it was the chemistry of batteries that made them secretly throttle certain iPhones on certain iOS versions and then that chemistry made Apple secretly cover it up by backdating edited release
    notes.

    It doesn't even _occur_ to the iKooks that it can't possibly be that Apple
    has a special battery chemistry that only works on a certain iOS version and that only works on certain iPhones with that certain iOS version.

    These iKooks like nospam believe whatever Apple feeds them to believe.

    As she assured me that German government was lying about its own nuclear power but was telling the exact truth about Chernobyl, that it was going
    to kill 1/4 million people. And cover it up. Somehow.

    Its called doublethink.

    You are astute.

    There is a lot that is Orwellian about these iKooks, who, in this thread,
    are the triad of Alan Baker, Jolly Roger & nospam - where everyone has Alan Baker plonked, and most plonk Jolly Roger - but nospam has some technical acumen when it's not related to defending everything Apple says and does, to the death, no matter what.


    I call these people in general ArtSuidents™ because what is important to them is the emotional and moral tenor of their lives. They buy Apple
    tech and German cars, because it makes them feel superior and good
    about themselves. Another habit they have was vest describe by Rudyard Kipling - and acute psychologist - in 'the Jungle Book'.

    "We are the greatest and the wisest people in the jungle...what we think
    to day the world will think tomorrow ... we all say it, so it must be true!"

    Bandar Log. The monkey people.

    You appear to be well read.

    You are correct that their own self esteem is in the toilet (rightly so),
    hence they derive a large portion of their self esteem from what Apple feeds them, much like the ArtStudents you speak of.

    They actually _believe_ every excuse Apple feeds them (e.g., it's
    "courageous") each time the iPhone loses its standard basic functionality.

    They are not stupid people, they are that most dangerous of species,
    people who are a bit smart, but think they are a lot smarter than they
    are, and as smart as anybody else.

    Here's where I beg to differ as both Alan Baker and Jolly Roger I assess to
    own a 40 IQ based on their almost total inability to comprehend the subject matter and on their responses always being at about the kindergarten level.

    As for nospam, he's at least double that IQ (still well below normal), which
    I base on the fact that nospam _can_ comprehend the basic technical facts.

    Where nospam shows he is substandard in IQ is his lack of an _adult_
    response to facts he has no defense to, other than to deny them outright.

    That's why, for example, you saw nospam claim what he does about the 3.5mm
    jack and the FM radio, where he has no _adult_ response to the facts.

    If he were of at least average intelligence, his response would be different than simply denying that anyone would ever want what is, in effect, the most standard of the most common of the most basic of common functionality.

    But they are intellectually lazy: the short cut of simply receiving
    someone else's wisdom instead of the hard work of acquiring some
    themselves, is simply too tempting

    Well, you do have a point.

    When we covered the insecure nature of the iPhone, they constantly spewed
    the advertising that Apple fed them, instead of thinking for themselves.

    They lack the basic adult ability of independent thought processes, is what
    I'm hearing you say; is that right?


    In a political context they are called 'useful idiots' : they will latch
    on to any 'new' idea and support it with fervour simply in order to be
    as they see it 'ahead of the game'.

    Marketing to this group consists in generating an emotional narrative
    about the product that presents it in the light of being 'new,
    promising, and full of hope - the obvious choice of an intelligent
    person', Rather than 'true, useful, tried and tested'

    Here again you seem to completely understand how Apple has them on a leash!

    They latch on to the loss of the 3.5mm jack as being "courageous", so they themselves feel so very courageous when they strut about with their iPhone
    that is missing the functionality.

    Apple took away the functionality and made them feel _brave_ about doing it.

    Or as the Daily Mash put it 'clever science man say new shiny thing make everything better'

    We ran a study a few years ago showing almost all consumer electronics gets better, faster, and cheaper over time ... except ... Apple products.

    The reason is MARKETING of that "shiny thing" creates a demand in these impressionable people you speak of - which drives up the prices.

    Whenever you detect a potential emotional bias to a narrative, the implication that those not 'with it' are incurable Neanderthals, an/or research that implies that '97% of everybody who counts believes in it'
    you may be sure its snake oil...

    I think you understand them well in calling them incurable neanderthals.
    The three that are in this thread are nospam, Jolly Roger & Alan Baker.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Hank Rogers@3:770/3 to Andy Burnelli on Tue Apr 19 22:51:40 2022
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    Andy Burnelli wrote:
    Hank Rogers wrote:

    Well, maybe so, but he's always good for a laff.

    I'm going to give you one more of these kindergarten no-content
    completely
    childish always non technical responses before I plonk you "Hank
    Rogers".

    One more. And then plonk. No warning. Just plonk.

    If you can't ever contribute as an adult to the actual topic, then
    plonking
    you _improves_ the value of the conversation here on this newsgroup.

    One more. Then plonk.

    Hey, no fair! I just think you're a real funny guy. Sort of like
    don rickles. It's a hoot when you get all the ikooks worked up. And
    I love your book pics. You should be on stage!

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Hank Rogers@3:770/3 to Andy Burnelli on Tue Apr 19 22:57:20 2022
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    Andy Burnelli wrote:
    Lewis wrote:

    Has the shitbag ever stated a single fact in any thread?

    Before I said the iKooks in this thread were:
    a. Alan Baker (everyone has him plonked as he cannot add value)
    b. nospam (most people keep him as he "can" add value
    c. Jolly Roger (filled with kindergarten hateful vitriol)

    And now, we have Jolly Roger's twin in kindergarten hate-filled
    vitriol:
    d. Lewis

    For those who don't know, Lewis & Jolly Roger _hate_ every fact
    about Apple
    because the facts _hurt_ them deeply since they _believe_
    everything Apple
    told them.

    I liken both of them to the fifth grade bully who was held back a
    few years,
    when someone who is years younger in the same grade tells him Santa
    isn't
    real.

     Lewis: Santa exists. He's gonna give me an iPhone for Christmas.
     Child: That's just a marketing gimmick. Your parents are Santa.

     Lewis. No. I hate you! He exists! I saw him on an Apple
    advertisement.
     Child: That's how marketing works, Lewis. Don't believe Apple ads.

     Lewis: Liar! Liar! Pants on fire! Apple said it. It must be true!
    What Jolly Roger does is call all facts trolls; and what Lewis does
    is call
    all people who tell them facts, "shitbags". Just watch.

    You can ask _why_ facts are so scary to these people but if you
    understand
    the Santa analogy, the fact alone _destroys_ their cuddly belief
    systems.

    They not only hate the facts - but they hate the mere messenger of
    facts.
    Just watch.

    Well, they might hate you, but I like you. I really enjoyed the
    latest gallery of book photos you posted.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Charlie Gibbs@3:770/3 to nospam on Wed Apr 20 05:27:52 2022
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2022-04-19, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote:

    In article <t3n76u$ibl$1@dont-email.me>, sms
    <scharf.steven@geemail.com> wrote:

    And where do you go that has FM coverage...

    ...but no cellular data?

    You're assuming that everyone has unlimited data with which to stream
    radio stations.

    you're assuming unlimited data is needed. it's not, largely because
    most of the time, people are on wifi.

    You're assumng there's a nearby hotspot for which they have the
    password. At home, you pay your ISP for your own wifi (unless
    you're leeching off your neighbour). It's not free - or always
    available.

    But actually, depending on the carrier, there are definitely places
    where there is FM coverage but no cellular data.

    very few.

    Not as few as you might think. Two days a week I work at an office
    out in the country which has no cell coverage. FM radios work fine
    there, though.

    cellular coverage on highways is *more* common than fm, and if the
    audio is sent to the vehicle's sound system, it will be impossible
    to hear a difference.

    Depends on where you are. Cell companies take great pains to ensure
    good coverage along major highways, even out in the sticks. Go a
    few miles on either side and the situation can be very different.

    --
    /~\ Charlie Gibbs | Microsoft is a dictatorship.
    \ / <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> | Apple is a cult.
    X I'm really at ac.dekanfrus | Linux is anarchy.
    / \ if you read it the right way. | Pick your poison.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Andy Burnelli@3:770/3 to nospam on Fri Apr 22 21:14:10 2022
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    nospam wrote:

    Again, if I can find the old board I wire wrapped, I'll snap a photo.

    be sure to pose it with some textbooks.

    The fact you completely lack education is why you deprecate textbooks.
    You always brazenly fabricate everything you claim.

    BTW, did you also have a set of well-stocked parts bins like I do?

    not anymore, although i might still have the wire wrap gun. that was a
    cool device.

    I doubt you have one nospam since you brazenly fabricate everything.
    Let's see a picture of that wire-wrap gun, nospam, next to your iPhone.

    Since my credibility is an asset, here's my _hand_ wire-wrap tool.
    <https://i.postimg.cc/6QkQrDBb/parts03.jpg>

    And yes, you know that's my iPad since it's asking me to log in again:
    <https://i.postimg.cc/zDMxn7hb/parts02.jpg>

    BTW, you deprecated my vacuum-tube experience, but do you have _any_ idea
    what that I/F injection tool is used for nospam?

    I didn't think so.
    You _fabricated_ everything you claimed, nospam.

    Every word from you is a brazen fabrication which you _never_ back up.

    now i have a bunch of raspberry pis, various hats and a bunch of micro
    sd cards.

    I don't believe a word you say nospam because you fabricate everything.

    BTW, here's _my_ rasperry pi and the transducers to go along with it.
    <https://i.postimg.cc/zfbhdcxg/pi02.jpg> Pi and associated transducers

    And to prove it's mine, here's a shot of it next to my iPad.
    <https://i.postimg.cc/CKFCmNWC/pi01.jpg> Raspberry Pi and associated parts

    The difference between you and me is I don't fabricate my education.
    You do.

    Let's see a _single_ shot of your proof nospam.
    Show us just one!

    Show us your wire-wrapping gun next to your iPhone nospam.
    Back up your brazen fabrications of imaginary experience for once.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From sms@3:770/3 to Charlie Gibbs on Fri Apr 22 12:58:00 2022
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 4/22/2022 12:23 PM, Charlie Gibbs wrote:

    <snip>

    It's a basic marketing principle, pushed by marketroids (and adopted as
    an article of faith by J. Random Luser) since long before Apple existed:

    "If we don't have it, you don't need it."

    Or "we used to have it but we got rid of it and even if you used it you
    really don't need it anymore and it was an act of courage for us to take
    it away." See <https://www.google.com/search?q=courage+3.5mm>.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Charlie Gibbs@3:770/3 to Andy Burnelli on Fri Apr 22 19:23:26 2022
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2022-04-21, Andy Burnelli <spam@nospam.com> wrote:

    sms wrote:

    Lewis is wrong of course.

    The folks on the c.s.r.p group may not be familiar with the iKooks, where
    all the iKooks have the _same_ response in _any_ topic that purports to mention the lack of basic functionality of their beloved product line.

    In this case, it's FM radio - where they claim that it exists in another form, and that nobody wants it anyway, and that most phones don't have it, etc., all of which are always wrong since most phones _do_ have it.

    Just not iPhones.

    It's a basic marketing principle, pushed by marketroids (and adopted as
    an article of faith by J. Random Luser) since long before Apple existed:

    "If we don't have it, you don't need it."

    --
    /~\ Charlie Gibbs | Microsoft is a dictatorship.
    \ / <cgibbs@kltpzyxm.invalid> | Apple is a cult.
    X I'm really at ac.dekanfrus | Linux is anarchy.
    / \ if you read it the right way. | Pick your poison.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Jolly Roger@3:770/3 to nospam on Fri Apr 22 19:58:44 2022
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2022-04-22, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote:
    In article <t3uth2$1361$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Andy Burnelli
    <spam@nospam.com> wrote:

    Again, if I can find the old board I wire wrapped, I'll snap a photo.

    be sure to pose it with some textbooks.

    BTW, did you also have a set of well-stocked parts bins like I do?

    not anymore, although i might still have the wire wrap gun. that was a
    cool device.

    now i have a bunch of raspberry pis, various hats and a bunch of micro
    sd cards.

    ...but no old, crufty books? No sale!

    --
    E-mail sent to this address may be devoured by my ravenous SPAM filter.
    I often ignore posts from Google. Use a real news client instead.

    JR

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Alan@3:770/3 to Andy Burnelli on Fri Apr 22 13:19:02 2022
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    On 2022-04-22 1:14 p.m., Andy Burnelli wrote:
    nospam wrote:

    Again, if I can find the old board I wire wrapped, I'll snap a photo.

    be sure to pose it with some textbooks.

    The fact you completely lack education is why you deprecate textbooks.

    Not at all.

    What we all see is that pictures of textbooks prove nothing about
    education in a subject.

    BTW, did you also have a set of well-stocked parts bins like I do?

    not anymore, although i might still have the wire wrap gun. that was a
    cool device.

    I doubt you have one nospam since you brazenly fabricate everything.
    Let's see a picture of that wire-wrap gun, nospam, next to your iPhone.

    You mean the way your pictures are always posed next to your phone...

    ...right?


    Since my credibility is an asset, here's my _hand_ wire-wrap tool. <https://i.postimg.cc/6QkQrDBb/parts03.jpg>

    But it's not next to your phone...


    And yes, you know that's my iPad since it's asking me to log in again: <https://i.postimg.cc/zDMxn7hb/parts02.jpg>

    Which you don't have to do if you don't wish to.


    BTW, you deprecated my vacuum-tube experience, but do you have _any_ idea what that I/F injection tool is used for nospam?

    I didn't think so.
    You _fabricated_ everything you claimed, nospam.

    Every word from you is a brazen fabrication which you _never_ back up.

    now i have a bunch of raspberry pis, various hats and a bunch of micro
    sd cards.

    I don't believe a word you say nospam because you fabricate everything.

    BTW, here's _my_ rasperry pi and the transducers to go along with it. <https://i.postimg.cc/zfbhdcxg/pi02.jpg> Pi and associated transducers

    And to prove it's mine, here's a shot of it next to my iPad. <https://i.postimg.cc/CKFCmNWC/pi01.jpg> Raspberry Pi and associated parts

    The difference between you and me is I don't fabricate my education.

    You certainly don't prove it...

    You do.

    Let's see a _single_ shot of your proof nospam.
    Show us just one!

    Right after you.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Andy Burnelli@3:770/3 to Jolly Roger on Fri Apr 22 21:20:42 2022
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    Jolly Roger wrote:

    now i have a bunch of raspberry pis, various hats and a bunch of micro
    sd cards.

    ...but no old, crufty books? No sale!

    None of the iKooks has _any_ education; so they deprecate the vast knowledge gleaned by having higher degrees in the very stuff they fabricate they know.

    And yet... never once do the iKooks _ever_ back up any of their claims.
    They just pretend.

    At least I back up my claims - and yet - they never do. Because they can't.

    <https://i.postimg.cc/CKFCmNWC/pi01.jpg> Raspberry Pi and associated parts
    <https://i.postimg.cc/zfbhdcxg/pi02.jpg> Pi and associated transducers
    <https://i.postimg.cc/j2pJbkpw/parts01.jpg> Parts bins everyone had
    <https://i.postimg.cc/zDMxn7hb/parts02.jpg> EPROM & wire-wrap tool
    <https://i.postimg.cc/6QkQrDBb/parts03.jpg> 7400 TTL ICs & testing tools

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Hank Rogers@3:770/3 to Jolly Roger on Fri Apr 22 15:19:30 2022
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    Jolly Roger wrote:
    On 2022-04-22, nospam <nospam@nospam.invalid> wrote:
    In article <t3uth2$1361$1@gioia.aioe.org>, Andy Burnelli
    <spam@nospam.com> wrote:

    Again, if I can find the old board I wire wrapped, I'll snap a photo.

    be sure to pose it with some textbooks.

    BTW, did you also have a set of well-stocked parts bins like I do?

    not anymore, although i might still have the wire wrap gun. that was a
    cool device.

    now i have a bunch of raspberry pis, various hats and a bunch of micro
    sd cards.

    ...but no old, crufty books? No sale!


    Ahahahahaha. That's a definite requirement for all intelligent,
    highly educated adults on this group.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Andy Burnelli@3:770/3 to nospam on Sun Apr 24 05:31:38 2022
    XPost: comp.mobile.android, misc.phone.mobile.iphone

    nospam wrote:

    My parts bin still has some of those Radio Shack parts.
    <https://i.postimg.cc/D0mcbKNS/parts04.jpg> Radio Shack spare parts

    those look like they're from the 1970s. why are they still unopened?

    I'm not sure if there is a specific reason they're unopened, as one is a MOV which, I'm sure you'll remember, we all used to put across our power lines
    back in the day to shunt spikes.

    The other is an LED digit, as I recall (I'm not looking at the photos at the moment as it doesn't really matter since I have boxes of these spare parts), which, as you will also recall if you ever built circuits, we used to
    indicate the displays on the myriad electronics projects we built back then.

    As I said, I have parts all over since we would design circuits to work, and then we'd see what we had by way of parts in stock, and if we needed to
    change the design to fit the part, that's what we'd do.

    It's what everyone did in those days... as far as I know.

    otherwise, mail order.

    I don't remember ever doing mail order for basic TTL ICs, but maybe.

    i did.

    the back pages of popular electronics, radio electronics and similar magazines had numerous ads, including polypaks, james, olson,
    lafayette, plus heathkit for entire kits.

    <https://live.staticflickr.com/4009/4455981283_26760272eb_k.jpg> <https://live.staticflickr.com/2778/4455979995_b11b12c8c6_k.jpg>

    Actually, now I remember... digikey was a biggie, as I recall. I used to get the TTL IC's in long plastic packages, stuffed with decoders and muxes, and,
    of course, everyone's favorite other than a 7400 nand gates, the 555 timer.


    I'd buy the Forest Mims' series and make circuits like with the 555 timer.

    the 555 was an incredibly useful chip.

    Yup. I had a book from Forest Mims, as I recall, which was written on "graph paper" that he wrote out a score of useful circuits using that 555 timer.


    You've never told the truth in your life so why would I believe you now?

    why would anyone believe someone who changes his nym more often than
    his underwear?

    Hehhehheh... again, that comment shows instantly that you lack even the most basic of adult comprehensive skills given I've said why the wrapping paper
    is just to prevent people from seeing what the package is inside for people
    who aren't the rightful recipient of that valuable package in the body.

    That you can't comprehend something that simple is a clear indicator of not only your lack of even the most basic of an IQ, but your lack of education.

    It's always the same with people like you who are truly despicable people.

    You _hate_ you lack intelligence & education of others; so you make idiotic claims like that one which shows more about you than it does about us.

    At least I own a raspi (although it was given to me for free long ago).

    only one? i have a bag full of them. they're cheap.

    Bullshit.

    unfortunately, they're very backordered, with estimates that it will
    resolve sometime in 2023, causing the prices on ebay to be ridiculously
    high.

    fortunately, i have a bunch which should last through the drought.

    Bullshit.

    Nonetheless, I've been working on improving Android mirroring onto Windows
    but some day I might take a look at that free raspi and see what it can do.
    <https://i.postimg.cc/N0G1TXcZ/scrcpy01.jpg> Mirror Android on any PC
    <https://i.postimg.cc/tTmdgKTB/scrcpy02.jpg> An efficient program setup
    <https://i.postimg.cc/Vvrq0K0m/scrcpy03.jpg> The efficient setup explained
    <https://i.postimg.cc/Y00vx4yp/scrcpy04.jpg> Extraneous cmd window (&)
    <https://i.postimg.cc/wvsbcNBz/scrcpy05.jpg> Drag APK from Windows
    <https://i.postimg.cc/Sx1hgWmY/scrcpy06.jpg> Press two hardware buttons
    <https://i.postimg.cc/hjkVFyqJ/scrcpy07.jpg> Android mnt as drive letter
    <https://i.postimg.cc/nV6K0Cfn/scrcpy08.jpg> CMD test of showwin.bat
    <https://i.postimg.cc/66Gn2t2g/scrcpy09.jpg> REG test of showwin.bat
    <https://i.postimg.cc/htMdWG6z/scrcpy10.jpg> The console came up :(
    <https://i.postimg.cc/7LWJhWxq/scrcpy11.jpg> Shortcut test of showwin.lnk
    <https://i.postimg.cc/yYKNnHxD/scrcpy12.jpg> REG test of showwin.lnk
    <https://i.postimg.cc/CxXH6N2r/scrcpy13.jpg> No scrcpy console window!
    <https://i.postimg.cc/XqZsmVFM/scrcpy14.jpg> AppPath & shortcut TARGET
    <https://i.postimg.cc/g2yNftw0/scrcpy15.jpg> Trick to pin batch shortcut
    <https://i.postimg.cc/5NrK7jtg/scrcpy16.jpg> powershell hide-console trick
    <https://i.postimg.cc/bvRXdbxg/scrcpy17.jpg> AutoIT & IFFT & Automate
    <https://i.postimg.cc/Y93b1z0n/scrcpy18.jpg> APKs at FOSS Google Play Store
    --
    Usenet is where kind-hearted people daily gather to voluntarily help others.

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)
  • From Ahem A Rivet's Shot@3:770/3 to Andy Burnelli on Sat Apr 30 06:36:18 2022
    XPost: comp.mobile.android

    On Fri, 29 Apr 2022 21:33:11 +0100
    Andy Burnelli <spam@nospam.com> wrote:

    Why oh why did you drop the crosspost to the iphone group ?

    nospam wrote:

    I had that filtered!

    The iKooks can't ever formulate a sensible argument on ANY topic.

    That term is not clever it is inflammatory and arguably it
    may be considered "hate speech" - it would be better for all if you were to stop engaging with them, it encourages them and irritates everyone else.

    I've said my piece, after all you may be software for all I know.

    --
    Steve O'Hara-Smith
    Odds and Ends at http://www.sohara.org/

    --- SoupGate-Win32 v1.05
    * Origin: Agency HUB, Dunedin - New Zealand | Fido<>Usenet Gateway (3:770/3)