• Political Eggs

    From Aaron Thomas@1:342/201 to All on Tue Feb 11 19:12:40 2025
    Experts say, and studies suggest (lol) that the ever-increasing price of eggs is raising concerns.

    Concern #1: According to Google "There is no evidence that bird flu spreads from birds to eggs that are properly cooked."

    So what's with the chicken holocaust then?

    Alarm #2: Eggs are a unique food because they are protected by a natural barrier from outside contaminants. If someone wanted to poison our food,
    they would find eggs to be somewhat difficult to taint.

    So then is all the other food being poisoned and the elitists don't want us eating eggs because eggs can be key to our survival?

    This aren't conspiracy theories. This is political survivalism.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)
    * Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/201)
  • From Ron L.@1:120/616 to Aaron Thomas on Wed Feb 12 07:25:44 2025
    Aaron Thomas wrote to All <=-

    So then is all the other food being poisoned and the elitists don't
    want us eating eggs because eggs can be key to our survival?

    Probably closer to the truth than not.

    I know that many of the "healthy" foods that we eat today are highly contaminated.

    ex:
    Rice grown in the U.S. is always contaiminated by heavy metals from the pestacides of days gone by.

    I used to eat steel cut oatmeal for breakfast a lot. But I noticed that I was gaining too much weight. Even after reviewing my diet and the calories in it, I was still gaining weight. Then I did some research and found that recently the FDA allowed the food companies to spray the harvested oats with pestacides.
    And there was the "smoking gun". I stopped eating oatmeal and my weight went back down.

    I find that I can't eat salads anymore either. They make me, literally, ill. I'm assuming from the chemicals that they use on it now.

    I can't wait for RFK Jr. to get in.


    ... Everyone is gifted. Some just open their packages sooner.
    ___ MultiMail/Linux v0.52

    --- Mystic BBS/QWK v1.12 A47 2021/12/25 (Windows/32)
    * Origin: cold fusion - cfbbs.net - grand rapids, mi (1:120/616)
  • From Aaron Thomas@1:342/201 to Ron L. on Wed Feb 12 06:29:30 2025
    So then is all the other food being poisoned and the elitists don't want us eating eggs because eggs can be key to our survival?

    Probably closer to the truth than not.

    I know that many of the "healthy" foods that we eat today are highly contaminated.

    The media keeps saying "don't eat processed foods," and it sounds smart, but since the media is saying it, that makes me want to eat more processed foods.

    I used to eat steel cut oatmeal for breakfast a lot. But I noticed that
    I was gaining too much weight. Even after reviewing my diet and the calories in it, I was still gaining weight. Then I did some research
    and found that recently the FDA allowed the food companies to spray the harvested oats with pestacides. And there was the "smoking gun". I stopped eating oatmeal and my weight went back down.

    I'm really bad at eating healthy. I eat a bunch of eggs and toast on potato bread, and that's probably good, but then I eat crap for lunch and dinner.

    I can't wait for RFK Jr. to get in.

    I hope he cracks some skulls.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)
    * Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/201)
  • From Mike Powell@1:2320/105 to AARON THOMAS on Wed Feb 12 10:12:00 2025
    Concern #1: According to Google "There is no evidence that bird flu spreads from birds to eggs that are properly cooked."

    So what's with the chicken holocaust then?

    It has less to do with the eggs than it does with the birds that lay them. People cannot harvest the supposedly safe eggs if they cannot get anywhere
    near the sick birds. Also, a farm or company that has a lot of birds isn't going to want the sick ones sticking around to infect the rest of the flock.

    Alarm #2: Eggs are a unique food because they are protected by a natural barrier from outside contaminants. If someone wanted to poison our food,
    they would find eggs to be somewhat difficult to taint.

    So then is all the other food being poisoned and the elitists don't want us eating eggs because eggs can be key to our survival?

    This aren't conspiracy theories. This is political survivalism.

    See above.


    * SLMR 2.1a * Who is General Failure, and why is he reading my disk?!
    --- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)
  • From Aaron Thomas@1:342/201 to Mike Powell on Wed Feb 12 11:45:42 2025
    So what's with the chicken holocaust then?

    It has less to do with the eggs than it does with the birds that lay
    them. People cannot harvest the supposedly safe eggs if they cannot get anywhere near the sick birds. Also, a farm or company that has a lot of birds isn't going to want the sick ones sticking around to infect the
    rest of the flock.

    I'm not familiar with the processing of chickens. Are they butchered manually? Based on what Google says about the eggs, it sounds like the chicken meat could still be viable also.

    It also makes me wonder if chickens can be expected to make a full recovery from bird flu, and if the farmers could just wait for it to pass?

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)
    * Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/201)
  • From Ron L.@1:120/616 to Aaron Thomas on Thu Feb 13 07:47:48 2025
    Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-

    The media keeps saying "don't eat processed foods," and it sounds
    smart, but since the media is saying it, that makes me want to eat more processed foods.

    As usual, the media is warping the truth to promote what their masters want.

    Unless you pull it from the ground, and only clean it before eating it, you are eating processed food. Did you cook it? It's processed. Did you chop it up? It's processed.

    What they ought to be saying is "don't eat highly processed foods". And that's pretty easy. Simply don't buy anything outside of the produce area
    of your grocery store.

    But even then, those fruits and veggies are highly contaiminated by pesticides and other chemicals. Ever see a sign that says "produce kept fresh by Apeel"? Nope. Because they don't want you to know.

    I'm really bad at eating healthy. I eat a bunch of eggs and toast on potato bread, and that's probably good, but then I eat crap for lunch
    and dinner.

    Most of us are simply because we don't want to spend the time/effort to eat well. We want to get on with out lives so instead of cooking a healthy meal, we just say "screw it" and head into McDonalds.

    But even if we buckled down and only ate "healthy" foods, we would still not be heating healthy because of the chemicals.

    Conspiracy theory: The reason they are working on making the price of eggs so high is because it's the one food that has a natural protection from contamination and they can't taint it like the other food.

    I can't wait for RFK Jr. to get in.

    I hope he cracks some skulls.

    Realitically, I think he will raise awareness and make many medical and food company CEOs "retire" as he demands proof that their stuff is safe and they cannot produce such proof (which was supposedly required to pass the FDA).


    ... If at first you don't succeed, call it Ver 1.0
    ___ MultiMail/Linux v0.52

    --- Mystic BBS/QWK v1.12 A47 2021/12/25 (Windows/32)
    * Origin: cold fusion - cfbbs.net - grand rapids, mi (1:120/616)
  • From Mike Powell@1:2320/105 to AARON THOMAS on Thu Feb 13 09:04:00 2025
    It has less to do with the eggs than it does with the birds that lay them. People cannot harvest the supposedly safe eggs if they cannot get anywhere near the sick birds. Also, a farm or company that has a lot of birds isn't going to want the sick ones sticking around to infect the rest of the flock.

    I'm not familiar with the processing of chickens. Are they butchered
    anually?
    Based on what Google says about the eggs, it sounds like the chicken meat
    oul
    still be viable also.

    I guess it depends on what you mean by "manually?" I don't think any large scale operations would be employing any neck wringers but, if they are
    anything like hogs, there are people involved in most steps of the process. There would be people who sort the chickens as they come off the trucks (to initially weed out any that appear infirmed or lame) and that heard them
    into the holding area, others that heard them from the holding pens to the
    kill floor, and still others involved in operating whatever kill device they are using.

    My understanding is that the process differs from hogs at this point as,
    with hogs (at least still in the 1990s), there would be a group that shaves
    the hair from the carcases and makes the initial cuts so the entrails fall
    out. With chickens, I think the de-feathering and entrail removal may
    happen via machine. The latter used to be done by filling their entrails
    with air so they "explode" out of the carcass, which is one of the reasons you need to be very careful handling raw chicken and only eating it when it is fully cooked. AFAIK, it is still done that way.

    In the little town my father grew up in, these days the two largest
    employers are the two chicken slaughter/processing plants. The jobs on
    offer are mostly not office jobs.

    It also makes me wonder if chickens can be expected to make a full recovery from bird flu, and if the farmers could just wait for it to pass?

    I have no idea but, unless you have a real good way to quarantine the sick birds, you risk losing your whole flock as it is very contagious.


    * SLMR 2.1a * Only XT users know that January 1, 1980 was a Tuesday.
    --- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)
  • From Aaron Thomas@1:342/201 to Ron L. on Thu Feb 13 09:52:10 2025
    As usual, the media is warping the truth to promote what their masters want.

    Unless you pull it from the ground, and only clean it before eating it, you are eating processed food. Did you cook it? It's processed. Did
    you chop it up? It's processed.

    Yea, they should say "don't eat foods that have sodium nitrate added," but instead, they've got us rejecting a can of diced tomatoes. "Processed foods" is another magic trick kinda like "migrant" and "vaccine."

    But even then, those fruits and veggies are highly contaiminated by pesticides and other chemicals. Ever see a sign that says "produce kept fresh by Apeel"? Nope. Because they don't want you to know.

    No, but I have been such a bad eater that I haven't bought any fruit or vegetables in years. I've got like 0 iron in my body.

    Most of us are simply because we don't want to spend the time/effort to eat well. We want to get on with out lives so instead of cooking a healthy meal, we just say "screw it" and head into McDonalds.

    That's what it is. Part of it is no time, the other part is no money. I've been trying to pay off by debts for a couple years now.

    Conspiracy theory: The reason they are working on making the price of
    eggs so high is because it's the one food that has a natural protection from contamination and they can't taint it like the other food.

    That's my theory. They probably could be tainted, but it would be more obvious.

    I can't wait for RFK Jr. to get in.

    I hope he cracks some skulls.

    Realitically, I think he will raise awareness and make many medical and food company CEOs "retire" as he demands proof that their stuff is safe and they cannot produce such proof (which was supposedly required to
    pass the FDA).

    I never knew that bleach was in white bread until a few months ago. That's ridiculous. Who knows what else we're inadvertently consuming because people aren't doing their jobs.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)
    * Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/201)
  • From Aaron Thomas@1:342/201 to Mike Powell on Thu Feb 13 20:50:24 2025
    of their "research" is. While we're here paying quadruple for eggs, ther scientists elsewhere potentially trying to ruin our chickens.

    Who says people mutated it? The main goal of a virus is to be able to mutate itself and spread. Mutating to the point where it can spread between species gives it even more potential hosts for mutating and spreading.

    Humans have admitted (under oath) to mutating SARS viruses. They mutated the viruses, then they told everyone "We think that covid came from a bat at a food market in China and now lots of people are going to die."

    Google's Gemini says that researchers at Texas Biomedical Research Institute have "studied bird flu strains isolated from humans and dairy cattle" and that "they've identified mutations that allow the virus to replicate more easily in human cells" and that "they've also identified nine mutations in a bird flu strain from a person in Texas."

    Researchers need to leave viruses alone. While they're "hard at work," there's not a single virus that we're safe from. IOW: the research is not making us safer and it sounds like it's actually making us less safe.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)
    * Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/201)
  • From Ron L.@1:120/616 to Aaron Thomas on Fri Feb 14 08:12:58 2025
    Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-

    Yea, they should say "don't eat foods that have sodium nitrate added,"
    but instead, they've got us rejecting a can of diced tomatoes.
    "Processed foods" is another magic trick kinda like "migrant" and "vaccine."

    Exactly. We have some of that stuff around the house as "emergency" food since it will keep for a long time.

    But much of what we eat is much more fresh and "farm to table" type of food. If it spoils after a week in the fridge, we know it was good (or, at the very least, better than the highly processed stuff).

    No, but I have been such a bad eater that I haven't bought any fruit or vegetables in years. I've got like 0 iron in my body.

    That's the way we used to be. Now nearly all of our grocery basket is from the produce area. And we still have to be careful.

    That's what it is. Part of it is no time, the other part is no money.
    I've been trying to pay off by debts for a couple years now.

    A while back I lost a lot of weight, to the point that even my underwear was falling down. My mom told me that she wanted my old clothes for the poor donations in her area. But my thought was "Why would poor people need size 50 pants?" Because they don't have the money to buy good food and eat at cheap places - and gain lots of weight. That was a shock for me.

    I never knew that bleach was in white bread until a few months ago.
    That's ridiculous. Who knows what else we're inadvertently consuming because people aren't doing their jobs.

    I think that more and more people are asking the same questions - and reading labels.

    RFK won't have to "ban" anything. He just needs to tell people "Hey, Yellow #3 will kill you" and most people will simply not buy anything with it in there.The market always corrects itself.


    ... Honk if you love obscene gestures.
    ___ MultiMail/Linux v0.52

    --- Mystic BBS/QWK v1.12 A47 2021/12/25 (Windows/32)
    * Origin: cold fusion - cfbbs.net - grand rapids, mi (1:120/616)
  • From Aaron Thomas@1:342/201 to Ron L. on Fri Feb 14 07:59:44 2025
    A while back I lost a lot of weight, to the point that even my underwear was falling down. My mom told me that she wanted my old clothes for the poor donations in her area. But my thought was "Why would poor people need size 50 pants?" Because they don't have the money to buy good food and eat at cheap places - and gain lots of weight. That was a shock for me.

    Yea produce is kinda expensive (worth it but expensive.) I used to buy grapes all the time but it seems like every other bag of grapes that I bought was sour. Same thing with strawberries, and they're like $4, just to throw in the trash.

    RFK won't have to "ban" anything. He just needs to tell people "Hey, Yellow #3 will kill you" and most people will simply not buy anything
    with it in there.The market always corrects itself.

    I'll take his advice. I appreciate how the media trashes his stance on vaccines so much, because that tells me that I'm doing the right thing by not taking any more vaccines.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)
    * Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/201)
  • From Mike Powell@1:2320/105 to AARON THOMAS on Fri Feb 14 10:20:00 2025
    Humans have admitted (under oath) to mutating SARS viruses.

    Which is not bird flu.

    They mutated the
    viruses, then they told everyone "We think that covid came from a bat at a foo
    market in China and now lots of people are going to die."

    They've still not proven it didn't come from the wet market.

    China has an interesting situation going on here. If it came from the wet market, their lab is not at fault but they are told they shouldn't have wet markets.

    If it is proven it didn't come from a wet market, they can go back to
    having those disease spreading places again. My guess is they would still
    deny it came from their lab (remember, their theory was that it came from
    "an enemy"), so that might actually be a win-win for them.

    Google's Gemini says that researchers at Texas Biomedical Research Institute have "studied bird flu strains isolated from humans and dairy cattle" and that
    "they've identified mutations that allow the virus to replicate more easily in
    human cells" and that "they've also identified nine mutations in a bird flu strain from a person in Texas."

    (1) Gemini is AI, which means you shouldn't trust its interpretation of
    the news -- something we've been discussing;
    (2) if Gemini *is* correct, that means they are more likely to find a
    cure, which should make your cost of eggs go *down*.

    Nothing you've posted above indicates that they are researching the weaponization of the virus. Trump is in charge now, and certainly he would *never* allow such a thing, right?

    Researchers need to leave viruses alone. While they're "hard at work," there's
    not a single virus that we're safe from. IOW: the research is not making us safer and it sounds like it's actually making us less safe.

    If they don't research it, there will never be a cure aside from killing
    the birds. If that is the only cure, your cost of eggs (and chicken meat)
    will never go down.


    * SLMR 2.1a * Op'ti-mism n. 1. A Yugo with a trailer hitch
    --- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)
  • From Kurt Weiske@1:218/1 to Aaron Thomas on Fri Feb 14 15:46:00 2025
    Aaron Thomas wrote to Mike Powell <=-

    Humans have admitted (under oath) to mutating SARS viruses. They
    mutated the viruses, then they told everyone "We think that covid came from a bat at a food market in China and now lots of people are going
    to die."

    I'm assuming that we all can stipulate that weaponizing known diseases
    happens. Just because something can be done doesn't mean that it should
    be done.


    --- MultiMail/Win v0.52
    * Origin: http://realitycheckbbs.org | tomorrow's retro tech (1:218/1)
  • From Ron L.@1:120/616 to Aaron Thomas on Sat Feb 15 08:13:08 2025
    Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-

    I'll take his advice. I appreciate how the media trashes his stance on vaccines so much, because that tells me that I'm doing the right thing
    by not taking any more vaccines.

    I love how the Media is useful now. Just do/think the opposite of what they tell you.


    ... You can never get rid of a bad temper by losing it.
    ___ MultiMail/Linux v0.52

    --- Mystic BBS/QWK v1.12 A47 2021/12/25 (Windows/32)
    * Origin: cold fusion - cfbbs.net - grand rapids, mi (1:120/616)
  • From Aaron Thomas@1:342/201 to Mike Powell on Sat Feb 15 09:32:12 2025
    Humans have admitted (under oath) to mutating SARS viruses.

    Which is not bird flu.

    But they're both viruses, and they're both being experimented with in laboratories.

    China has an interesting situation going on here. If it came from the
    wet market, their lab is not at fault but they are told they shouldn't have wet markets.

    If it is proven it didn't come from a wet market, they can go back to having those disease spreading places again. My guess is they would
    still deny it came from their lab (remember, their theory was that it
    came from "an enemy"), so that might actually be a win-win for them.

    I didn't know that was their position (that it came from an enemy) but I wouldn't doubt it, and I wonder who they mean by "enemy." Weren't we (the USA) technically their "enemy" at the time? The USA has tracks leading directly from Wuhan.

    Google's Gemini says that researchers at Texas Biomedical Research Insti have "studied bird flu strains isolated from humans and dairy cattle" an that
    "they've identified mutations that allow the virus to replicate more eas in
    human cells" and that "they've also identified nine mutations in a bird strain from a person in Texas."

    (1) Gemini is AI, which means you shouldn't trust its interpretation of

    I'll refrain from using Gemini as a source.

    Nothing you've posted above indicates that they are researching the weaponization of the virus. Trump is in charge now, and certainly he would *never* allow such a thing, right?

    The conclusions indicate it. Scientists are playing with viruses, they've
    been doing it for a long time, some secretively, yet there's still no cure for any virus, and very few viruses have a vaccine.

    There will never be a link to reference these conclusions, but they are conclusions that we are forced to come to.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)
    * Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/201)
  • From Aaron Thomas@1:342/201 to Kurt Weiske on Sat Feb 15 10:10:52 2025
    Humans have admitted (under oath) to mutating SARS viruses. They mutated the viruses, then they told everyone "We think that covid cam from a bat at a food market in China and now lots of people are going to die."

    I'm assuming that we all can stipulate that weaponizing known diseases
    happens. Just because something can be done doesn't mean that it should
    be done.

    I'm glad that you see this for what it is. What can be done about the narrative that says "We have to mutate viruses to make them 20x more deadly in order to create better vaccines?" There are people swallowing that like it's a tiny pill.

    Look how blind we were when the covid-19 pandemic was launched. What else are we being blind about? It would be foolish for us to believe that viruses are the primary choice for weaponizing innocent things. There could be nuclear bombs in our toasters for all we know.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)
    * Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/201)
  • From Kurt Weiske@1:218/1 to Aaron Thomas on Sat Feb 15 10:03:58 2025
    Aaron Thomas wrote to Kurt Weiske <=-

    I'm glad that you see this for what it is. What can be done about the narrative that says "We have to mutate viruses to make them 20x more deadly in order to create better vaccines?" There are people swallowing that like it's a tiny pill.

    I've never heard that narrative. I've heard the narrative that viruses
    could be groomed to make effective weapons in the ultimate in
    asymmetric warfare. And our worst nightmares.

    Look how blind we were when the covid-19 pandemic was launched. What
    else are we being blind about? It would be foolish for us to believe
    that viruses are the primary choice for weaponizing innocent things.
    There could be nuclear bombs in our toasters for all we know.

    A virus is a lot cheaper.



    --- MultiMail/Win v0.52
    * Origin: http://realitycheckbbs.org | tomorrow's retro tech (1:218/1)
  • From Aaron Thomas@1:342/201 to Kurt Weiske on Sat Feb 15 21:20:52 2025
    I'm glad that you see this for what it is. What can be done about the narrative that says "We have to mutate viruses to make them 20x more deadly in order to create better vaccines?" There are people swallowi that like it's a tiny pill.

    I've never heard that narrative. I've heard the narrative that viruses could be groomed to make effective weapons in the ultimate in
    asymmetric warfare. And our worst nightmares.

    When I make a query about this, Google refers me to an article from scientificamerican.com that says this:

    "Scientists perform these manipulations for many reasons, including wanting to understand how the microbes evade detection by our immune systems."

    They should study the effects of shoving their research up their pee holes.

    else are we being blind about? It would be foolish for us to believe that viruses are the primary choice for weaponizing innocent things. There could be nuclear bombs in our toasters for all we know.

    A virus is a lot cheaper.

    Good point. It's also easier to evade blame. But there's no way that viruses are the only experiment in progress.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)
    * Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/201)
  • From Ron L.@1:120/616 to Aaron Thomas on Sun Feb 16 09:33:04 2025
    Aaron Thomas wrote to Kurt Weiske <=-

    Look how blind we were when the covid-19 pandemic was launched. What
    else are we being blind about? It would be foolish for us to believe
    that viruses are the primary choice for weaponizing innocent things.
    There could be nuclear bombs in our toasters for all we know.

    We weren't blind. We were lied to. We were gaslit. Our institutions were discovered to have been hollowed out and turned into skinsuits for the Woke. Everything we had been programmed to trust turned out to be filled with liars.

    And it was done so quietly and slowly that few people noticed.


    ... Reality is an obstacle to hallucination.
    ___ MultiMail/Linux v0.52

    --- Mystic BBS/QWK v1.12 A47 2021/12/25 (Windows/32)
    * Origin: cold fusion - cfbbs.net - grand rapids, mi (1:120/616)
  • From Mike Powell@1:2320/105 to AARON THOMAS on Sun Feb 16 09:58:00 2025
    Nothing you've posted above indicates that they are researching the weaponization of the virus. Trump is in charge now, and certainly he would *never* allow such a thing, right?

    The conclusions indicate it. Scientists are playing with viruses, they've been doing it for a long time, some secretively, yet there's still no cure for
    any virus, and very few viruses have a vaccine.

    Depends on what you mean by "cure." If you visit your local cemetary, you
    will find a lot of young child and baby graves from before the 1900s, and likely quite a few less from after. Why? Because of vaccines. Polio, Smallpox, Diptheria, etc., didn't just go away on their own.


    * SLMR 2.1a * Computers make very fast, very efficient mistakes.
    --- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)
  • From Aaron Thomas@1:342/201 to Ron L. on Sun Feb 16 08:52:14 2025
    Look how blind we were when the covid-19 pandemic was launched. What else are we being blind about? It would be foolish for us to believe that viruses are the primary choice for weaponizing innocent things. There could be nuclear bombs in our toasters for all we know.

    We weren't blind. We were lied to. We were gaslit. Our institutions were discovered to have been hollowed out and turned into skinsuits for the Woke. Everything we had been programmed to trust turned out to be filled with liars.

    And it was done so quietly and slowly that few people noticed.

    That's what I mean. I wonder a lot about other potential lies that we're falling for. It could be things that are right under our noses, but we might not figure it out fast enough.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)
    * Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/201)
  • From Aaron Thomas@1:342/201 to Mike Powell on Sun Feb 16 10:59:50 2025
    Nothing you've posted above indicates that they are researching the weaponization of the virus. Trump is in charge now, and certainly would *never* allow such a thing, right?

    The conclusions indicate it. Scientists are playing with viruses, they'v been doing it for a long time, some secretively, yet there's still no cu for
    any virus, and very few viruses have a vaccine.

    Depends on what you mean by "cure." If you visit your local cemetary,
    you will find a lot of young child and baby graves from before the
    1900s, and likely quite a few less from after. Why? Because of
    vaccines. Polio, Smallpox, Diptheria, etc., didn't just go away on
    their own.

    There's no injectable cure for anything, so my point is there's no vaccine effective enough that it warrants the intentional mutation (and lab leak) of SARS viruses. And I can't find any reports of vaccines being produced by biolabs. The vaccines are being produced by pharmaceutical companies.

    Since I haven't seen the biolabs produce any vaccines, and since I have seen the damage that intentional virus mutation causes, that's how I draw the conclusion that the biolabs serve nothing but nefarious purposes.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)
    * Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/201)
  • From Ron L.@1:120/616 to Aaron Thomas on Mon Feb 17 07:20:04 2025
    Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-

    That's what I mean. I wonder a lot about other potential lies that
    we're falling for. It could be things that are right under our noses,
    but we might not figure it out fast enough.

    That's why Elon is dismantling their funding. Most of the media companies er... propagdan ministries... are being propped up somehow. We already know about USAID funding Politico.

    Take away the money, and they collapse. When they are gone, there will be less propaganda and censorship, the more truth will come out.


    ... Worth seeing? Yes, but not worth going to see.
    ___ MultiMail/Linux v0.52

    --- Mystic BBS/QWK v1.12 A47 2021/12/25 (Windows/32)
    * Origin: cold fusion - cfbbs.net - grand rapids, mi (1:120/616)
  • From Mike Powell@1:2320/105 to AARON THOMAS on Mon Feb 17 08:50:00 2025
    Depends on what you mean by "cure." If you visit your local cemetary, you will find a lot of young child and baby graves from before the 1900s, and likely quite a few less from after. Why? Because of vaccines. Polio, Smallpox, Diptheria, etc., didn't just go away on their own.

    There's no injectable cure for anything, so my point is there's no vaccine effective enough that it warrants the intentional mutation (and lab leak) of SARS viruses. And I can't find any reports of vaccines being produced by biolabs. The vaccines are being produced by pharmaceutical companies.

    Where do you think the testing for these vaccines, that the companies are producing, happens?

    I agree that biolabs shouldn't be intentional mutating viruses for any end other than disease prevention.

    Since I haven't seen the biolabs produce any vaccines, and since I have seen the damage that intentional virus mutation causes, that's how I draw the conclusion that the biolabs serve nothing but nefarious purposes.

    Where do you think the testing for these vaccines, that the companies are producing, happens?


    * SLMR 2.1a * Never draw fire, it irritates everyone around you.
    --- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)
  • From Kurt Weiske@1:218/1 to Ron L. on Mon Feb 17 10:03:28 2025
    Ron L. wrote to Aaron Thomas <=-

    That's why Elon is dismantling their funding. Most of the media
    companies er... propagdan ministries... are being propped up somehow.
    We already know about USAID funding Politico.

    Some clarity here -

    USAID paid $24,000 for subscriptions to their news service. Politico
    Pro made over $100 million in 2023. They have denied any subsidies from
    the US government.

    Across ALL of the US government, subscriptions totalled $8 million -
    again, a small proportion of Politico's revenues and certainly not
    propping up their business.

    Trump's press secretary, I'm sure was unintentionally vague when she
    said on 2/5:

    "I was made aware of the funding from USAID to media outlets, including Politico, who I know has a seat in this room. I can confirm that the
    more than 8 million taxpayer dollars that have gone to essentially
    subsidize subscriptions to Politico on the American taxpayers' dime will
    no longer be happening."

    It would be easy to confuse spending across the entire federal
    government with one organization under scrutiny, based on her words.
    But, even so, $8 million out of over $100 million in revenues is a drop
    in the proverbial bucket.

    I hope this clears things up.



    --- MultiMail/Win v0.52
    * Origin: http://realitycheckbbs.org | tomorrow's retro tech (1:218/1)
  • From Aaron Thomas@1:342/201 to Ron L. on Mon Feb 17 11:59:34 2025
    That's what I mean. I wonder a lot about other potential lies that we're falling for. It could be things that are right under our noses, but we might not figure it out fast enough.

    That's why Elon is dismantling their funding. Most of the media
    companies er... propagdan ministries... are being propped up somehow.
    We already know about USAID funding Politico.

    From what I understand, PBS is 1/2 funded by private organizations, but the other 1/2 is funded by taxpayers. I hope that stops with this administration. That channel is 90% propaganda.

    I'm realizing now how messed up it is when they say "Brought to you in part by...<name of some globalist company>"

    They should be saying "Brought to you in part by... YOU the taxpayer. Thanks for giving us the money to spew propaganda at your kids."

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)
    * Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/201)
  • From Aaron Thomas@1:342/201 to Mike Powell on Mon Feb 17 12:14:38 2025
    Since I haven't seen the biolabs produce any vaccines, and since I have the damage that intentional virus mutation causes, that's how I draw the conclusion that the biolabs serve nothing but nefarious purposes.

    Where do you think the testing for these vaccines, that the companies are producing, happens?

    I assumed that they'd conduct their research in their own dedicated research centers. The thought of my prescription meds being invented in a secretive Chinese university lab had never occurred to me.

    All these fun facts that came to light after the scamdemic have turned me into a skeptic of everything, and especially of products coming from big brands.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A49 2023/04/30 (Windows/64)
    * Origin: JoesBBS.Com, Telnet:23 SSH:22 HTTP:80 (1:342/201)
  • From Ron L.@1:120/616 to Aaron Thomas on Tue Feb 18 07:28:30 2025
    Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-

    From what I understand, PBS is 1/2 funded by private organizations, but the other 1/2 is funded by taxpayers. I hope that stops with this administration. That channel is 90% propaganda.

    There's been pushes for defunding PBS for a long time now. But I think this time it will happen.

    I remember watching shows on PBS that were really nice. Then I moved to another area and the PBS shows were awful. One of my co-workers who had been around for a long time told me "they only put the good shows on at donation time." He said that the Leftie running the local PBS mainly just put on shows that SHE liked.

    It's long past time for PBS to start listenng to the market.


    ... Blessed are the meek, for they make great scapegoats.
    ___ MultiMail/Linux v0.52

    --- Mystic BBS/QWK v1.12 A47 2021/12/25 (Windows/32)
    * Origin: cold fusion - cfbbs.net - grand rapids, mi (1:120/616)
  • From Kurt Weiske@1:218/1 to Ron L. on Tue Feb 18 06:45:34 2025
    Ron L. wrote to Aaron Thomas <=-

    Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-

    From what I understand, PBS is 1/2 funded by private organizations, but the other 1/2 is funded by taxpayers. I hope that stops with this administration. That channel is 90% propaganda.

    It's more like 15%, and I'm sure many disagree with your assessment of
    their content - myself included.

    It's long past time for PBS to start listenng to the market.

    PBS is a non-profit organization meant to be an alternative to
    market-driven broadcast radio and TV.



    --- MultiMail/Win v0.52
    * Origin: http://realitycheckbbs.org | tomorrow's retro tech (1:218/1)
  • From Mike Powell@1:2320/105 to KURT WEISKE on Wed Feb 19 10:05:00 2025
    From what I understand, PBS is 1/2 funded by private organizations, but the other 1/2 is funded by taxpayers. I hope that stops with this administration. That channel is 90% propaganda.

    It's more like 15%, and I'm sure many disagree with your assessment of
    their content - myself included.

    Until 2016 I would have disagreed completely. With the reaction of one of their then-anchors on a night shortly after the election, I have to agree
    that they employ at least one likely propaganda source. I used to watch
    their news almost every night. Now, I don't think I have tuned in intentionally at all for the past 8+ years.

    I wasn't watching but if one of their anchors had the same reaction to
    Biden's win in 2020, I would have felt the same way. PBS isn't MSNBC or FOX and they need not act like it.

    It's long past time for PBS to start listenng to the market.

    PBS is a non-profit organization meant to be an alternative to
    market-driven broadcast radio and TV.

    And I am overall glad we have it. If we didn't have it, I would miss a lot
    of shows that are not nearly as "brain-drainy" as what is on the major and cable networks.


    * SLMR 2.1a * Mistress: halfway between a mister and a mattress.
    --- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
    * Origin: capitolcityonline.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/HTTP (1:2320/105)