Aaron Thomas wrote to All <=-
So then is all the other food being poisoned and the elitists don't
want us eating eggs because eggs can be key to our survival?
So then is all the other food being poisoned and the elitists don't want us eating eggs because eggs can be key to our survival?
Probably closer to the truth than not.
I know that many of the "healthy" foods that we eat today are highly contaminated.
I used to eat steel cut oatmeal for breakfast a lot. But I noticed that
I was gaining too much weight. Even after reviewing my diet and the calories in it, I was still gaining weight. Then I did some research
and found that recently the FDA allowed the food companies to spray the harvested oats with pestacides. And there was the "smoking gun". I stopped eating oatmeal and my weight went back down.
I can't wait for RFK Jr. to get in.
Concern #1: According to Google "There is no evidence that bird flu spreads from birds to eggs that are properly cooked."
So what's with the chicken holocaust then?
Alarm #2: Eggs are a unique food because they are protected by a natural barrier from outside contaminants. If someone wanted to poison our food,
they would find eggs to be somewhat difficult to taint.
So then is all the other food being poisoned and the elitists don't want us eating eggs because eggs can be key to our survival?
This aren't conspiracy theories. This is political survivalism.
So what's with the chicken holocaust then?
It has less to do with the eggs than it does with the birds that lay
them. People cannot harvest the supposedly safe eggs if they cannot get anywhere near the sick birds. Also, a farm or company that has a lot of birds isn't going to want the sick ones sticking around to infect the
rest of the flock.
Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-
The media keeps saying "don't eat processed foods," and it sounds
smart, but since the media is saying it, that makes me want to eat more processed foods.
I'm really bad at eating healthy. I eat a bunch of eggs and toast on potato bread, and that's probably good, but then I eat crap for lunch
and dinner.
I can't wait for RFK Jr. to get in.
I hope he cracks some skulls.
anually?It has less to do with the eggs than it does with the birds that lay them. People cannot harvest the supposedly safe eggs if they cannot get anywhere near the sick birds. Also, a farm or company that has a lot of birds isn't going to want the sick ones sticking around to infect the rest of the flock.
I'm not familiar with the processing of chickens. Are they butchered
Based on what Google says about the eggs, it sounds like the chicken meatoul
still be viable also.
It also makes me wonder if chickens can be expected to make a full recovery from bird flu, and if the farmers could just wait for it to pass?
As usual, the media is warping the truth to promote what their masters want.
Unless you pull it from the ground, and only clean it before eating it, you are eating processed food. Did you cook it? It's processed. Did
you chop it up? It's processed.
But even then, those fruits and veggies are highly contaiminated by pesticides and other chemicals. Ever see a sign that says "produce kept fresh by Apeel"? Nope. Because they don't want you to know.
Most of us are simply because we don't want to spend the time/effort to eat well. We want to get on with out lives so instead of cooking a healthy meal, we just say "screw it" and head into McDonalds.
Conspiracy theory: The reason they are working on making the price of
eggs so high is because it's the one food that has a natural protection from contamination and they can't taint it like the other food.
I can't wait for RFK Jr. to get in.
I hope he cracks some skulls.
Realitically, I think he will raise awareness and make many medical and food company CEOs "retire" as he demands proof that their stuff is safe and they cannot produce such proof (which was supposedly required to
pass the FDA).
of their "research" is. While we're here paying quadruple for eggs, ther scientists elsewhere potentially trying to ruin our chickens.
Who says people mutated it? The main goal of a virus is to be able to mutate itself and spread. Mutating to the point where it can spread between species gives it even more potential hosts for mutating and spreading.
Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-
Yea, they should say "don't eat foods that have sodium nitrate added,"
but instead, they've got us rejecting a can of diced tomatoes.
"Processed foods" is another magic trick kinda like "migrant" and "vaccine."
No, but I have been such a bad eater that I haven't bought any fruit or vegetables in years. I've got like 0 iron in my body.
That's what it is. Part of it is no time, the other part is no money.
I've been trying to pay off by debts for a couple years now.
I never knew that bleach was in white bread until a few months ago.
That's ridiculous. Who knows what else we're inadvertently consuming because people aren't doing their jobs.
A while back I lost a lot of weight, to the point that even my underwear was falling down. My mom told me that she wanted my old clothes for the poor donations in her area. But my thought was "Why would poor people need size 50 pants?" Because they don't have the money to buy good food and eat at cheap places - and gain lots of weight. That was a shock for me.
RFK won't have to "ban" anything. He just needs to tell people "Hey, Yellow #3 will kill you" and most people will simply not buy anything
with it in there.The market always corrects itself.
Humans have admitted (under oath) to mutating SARS viruses.
They mutated the
viruses, then they told everyone "We think that covid came from a bat at a foo
market in China and now lots of people are going to die."
Google's Gemini says that researchers at Texas Biomedical Research Institute have "studied bird flu strains isolated from humans and dairy cattle" and that
"they've identified mutations that allow the virus to replicate more easily in
human cells" and that "they've also identified nine mutations in a bird flu strain from a person in Texas."
Researchers need to leave viruses alone. While they're "hard at work," there's
not a single virus that we're safe from. IOW: the research is not making us safer and it sounds like it's actually making us less safe.
Aaron Thomas wrote to Mike Powell <=-
Humans have admitted (under oath) to mutating SARS viruses. They
mutated the viruses, then they told everyone "We think that covid came from a bat at a food market in China and now lots of people are going
to die."
Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-
I'll take his advice. I appreciate how the media trashes his stance on vaccines so much, because that tells me that I'm doing the right thing
by not taking any more vaccines.
Humans have admitted (under oath) to mutating SARS viruses.
Which is not bird flu.
China has an interesting situation going on here. If it came from the
wet market, their lab is not at fault but they are told they shouldn't have wet markets.
If it is proven it didn't come from a wet market, they can go back to having those disease spreading places again. My guess is they would
still deny it came from their lab (remember, their theory was that it
came from "an enemy"), so that might actually be a win-win for them.
Google's Gemini says that researchers at Texas Biomedical Research Insti have "studied bird flu strains isolated from humans and dairy cattle" an that
"they've identified mutations that allow the virus to replicate more eas in
human cells" and that "they've also identified nine mutations in a bird strain from a person in Texas."
(1) Gemini is AI, which means you shouldn't trust its interpretation of
Nothing you've posted above indicates that they are researching the weaponization of the virus. Trump is in charge now, and certainly he would *never* allow such a thing, right?
Humans have admitted (under oath) to mutating SARS viruses. They mutated the viruses, then they told everyone "We think that covid cam from a bat at a food market in China and now lots of people are going to die."
I'm assuming that we all can stipulate that weaponizing known diseases
happens. Just because something can be done doesn't mean that it should
be done.
Aaron Thomas wrote to Kurt Weiske <=-
I'm glad that you see this for what it is. What can be done about the narrative that says "We have to mutate viruses to make them 20x more deadly in order to create better vaccines?" There are people swallowing that like it's a tiny pill.
Look how blind we were when the covid-19 pandemic was launched. What
else are we being blind about? It would be foolish for us to believe
that viruses are the primary choice for weaponizing innocent things.
There could be nuclear bombs in our toasters for all we know.
I'm glad that you see this for what it is. What can be done about the narrative that says "We have to mutate viruses to make them 20x more deadly in order to create better vaccines?" There are people swallowi that like it's a tiny pill.
I've never heard that narrative. I've heard the narrative that viruses could be groomed to make effective weapons in the ultimate in
asymmetric warfare. And our worst nightmares.
else are we being blind about? It would be foolish for us to believe that viruses are the primary choice for weaponizing innocent things. There could be nuclear bombs in our toasters for all we know.
A virus is a lot cheaper.
Aaron Thomas wrote to Kurt Weiske <=-
Look how blind we were when the covid-19 pandemic was launched. What
else are we being blind about? It would be foolish for us to believe
that viruses are the primary choice for weaponizing innocent things.
There could be nuclear bombs in our toasters for all we know.
Nothing you've posted above indicates that they are researching the weaponization of the virus. Trump is in charge now, and certainly he would *never* allow such a thing, right?
The conclusions indicate it. Scientists are playing with viruses, they've been doing it for a long time, some secretively, yet there's still no cure for
any virus, and very few viruses have a vaccine.
Look how blind we were when the covid-19 pandemic was launched. What else are we being blind about? It would be foolish for us to believe that viruses are the primary choice for weaponizing innocent things. There could be nuclear bombs in our toasters for all we know.
We weren't blind. We were lied to. We were gaslit. Our institutions were discovered to have been hollowed out and turned into skinsuits for the Woke. Everything we had been programmed to trust turned out to be filled with liars.
And it was done so quietly and slowly that few people noticed.
Nothing you've posted above indicates that they are researching the weaponization of the virus. Trump is in charge now, and certainly would *never* allow such a thing, right?
The conclusions indicate it. Scientists are playing with viruses, they'v been doing it for a long time, some secretively, yet there's still no cu for
any virus, and very few viruses have a vaccine.
Depends on what you mean by "cure." If you visit your local cemetary,
you will find a lot of young child and baby graves from before the
1900s, and likely quite a few less from after. Why? Because of
vaccines. Polio, Smallpox, Diptheria, etc., didn't just go away on
their own.
Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-
That's what I mean. I wonder a lot about other potential lies that
we're falling for. It could be things that are right under our noses,
but we might not figure it out fast enough.
Depends on what you mean by "cure." If you visit your local cemetary, you will find a lot of young child and baby graves from before the 1900s, and likely quite a few less from after. Why? Because of vaccines. Polio, Smallpox, Diptheria, etc., didn't just go away on their own.
There's no injectable cure for anything, so my point is there's no vaccine effective enough that it warrants the intentional mutation (and lab leak) of SARS viruses. And I can't find any reports of vaccines being produced by biolabs. The vaccines are being produced by pharmaceutical companies.
Since I haven't seen the biolabs produce any vaccines, and since I have seen the damage that intentional virus mutation causes, that's how I draw the conclusion that the biolabs serve nothing but nefarious purposes.
Ron L. wrote to Aaron Thomas <=-
That's why Elon is dismantling their funding. Most of the media
companies er... propagdan ministries... are being propped up somehow.
We already know about USAID funding Politico.
That's what I mean. I wonder a lot about other potential lies that we're falling for. It could be things that are right under our noses, but we might not figure it out fast enough.
That's why Elon is dismantling their funding. Most of the media
companies er... propagdan ministries... are being propped up somehow.
We already know about USAID funding Politico.
Since I haven't seen the biolabs produce any vaccines, and since I have the damage that intentional virus mutation causes, that's how I draw the conclusion that the biolabs serve nothing but nefarious purposes.
Where do you think the testing for these vaccines, that the companies are producing, happens?
Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-
From what I understand, PBS is 1/2 funded by private organizations, but the other 1/2 is funded by taxpayers. I hope that stops with this administration. That channel is 90% propaganda.
Ron L. wrote to Aaron Thomas <=-
Aaron Thomas wrote to Dr. What <=-
From what I understand, PBS is 1/2 funded by private organizations, but the other 1/2 is funded by taxpayers. I hope that stops with this administration. That channel is 90% propaganda.
It's long past time for PBS to start listenng to the market.
From what I understand, PBS is 1/2 funded by private organizations, but the other 1/2 is funded by taxpayers. I hope that stops with this administration. That channel is 90% propaganda.
It's more like 15%, and I'm sure many disagree with your assessment of
their content - myself included.
It's long past time for PBS to start listenng to the market.
PBS is a non-profit organization meant to be an alternative to
market-driven broadcast radio and TV.
Sysop: | Coz |
---|---|
Location: | Anoka, MN |
Users: | 2 |
Nodes: | 4 (0 / 4) |
Uptime: | 109:34:41 |
Calls: | 295 |
Files: | 5,636 |
Messages: | 226,319 |