"We do not live in a dictatorship. Delegates are not oligarchs. Installing Kamala Harris as the Democratic nominee and an unknown vice president without any public voting process would make the modern Democratic Party
*a party of hypocrites""
"We do not live in a dictatorship. Delegates are not oligarchs. Installing >>Kamala Harris as the Democratic nominee and an unknown vice president without >>any public voting process would make the modern Democratic Party
*a party of hypocrites""
Hardly.
Biden got the delegates but he is no longer seeking the nomination.
Those delegates will now go to the place of their choosing. No dictators or oligarchs involved.
"We do not live in a dictatorship. Delegates are not oligarchs. Installing Kamala Harris as the Democratic nominee and an unknown vice president without any public voting process would make the modern Democratic Party *a party of hypocrites""
-- Black Lives Matter statement
Not my words.
Funny how you quoted that and removed the source.
In 2024, Biden ran as an incumbent, which meant no one of note wanted to
run against him. He won, and then stepped aside in favor of someone else
who wasn't even a choice on the ballot.
In 2024, Biden ran as an incumbent, which meant no one of note wanted to run
against him. He won, and then stepped aside in favor of someone else who wasn't even a choice on the ballot.
That someone else ran in 2020 and got *NO* delegates of her own.
Contrast that with Tulsi Gabbard, who ran without any real party support but
still managed to win delegates.
"We do not live in a dictatorship. Delegates are not oligarchs. Installing Kamala Harris as the Democratic nominee and an unknown vice president without any public voting process would make the modern Democratic Party *a party of hypocrites""
Democrat convention hasn't happened yet and I'm curious how they are going to do this...
They are running out of options though.
In 2024, Biden ran as an incumbent, which meant no one of note wanted to run against him. He won, and then stepped aside in favor of someone else who wasn't even a choice on the ballot.
Biden is not seeking re-election, he stated plainly his reasons.
There is no contraversy around it.
If they debate her before the convention, and it doesn't go well, the Democrats will just thrown her under the bus and go with yet another option. Glad they are waiting to see how this pans out.
I am also curious to see how it goes. With the Obamas throwing their support behind Kamala yesterday, I don't see how it can go another way. That said, I think that the Trump team is smart not to schedule a debate, or to engage with her too much in general, until after the convention.
If they debate her before the convention, and it doesn't go well, the Democrats will just thrown her under the bus and go with yet another option. Glad they are waiting to see how this pans out.
Supposedly, there is an HRC faction that may be pulling towards another candidate (don't know who) but I don't put much weight behind her against Obama's faction.
Meanwhile, I do honestly believe that Vance and others just need to leave Joe alone. Let the Democrats take care of that. With Trump now being
the o ldest person in the race, I don't think it is a good look.
He was. He should have stepped aside before the primaries were started, and certainly before they were over. Instead, you had a whole bunch of
Democrats who knew better trying to tell America that he was ok.
There is no contraversy around it.
If you don't mind that your party will bow to pressure from celebrities
then, yeah, there is no controversy.
If you don't mind that your party will lie to you about the mental health of their presumptive candidate just to win an election, only to start telling the truth after he bombs in a debate,
then yeah there is no controversy.
If they debate her before the convention, and it doesn't go well, the Democrats will just thrown her under the bus and go with yet another option. Glad they are waiting to see how this pans out.
How many times can white-out be applied to a bumper sticker? This will be yet >another test for the American people ;)
I heard/read that the Obamas had someone else in mind... But Joe did an FU move
by endorsing Kamala as soon as he did. It forced Barry's hand.
I saw an FEC person on the News and they said that they just transfer money >from Joe to Kamala... He said that Trump will need to fight it. There is >nothing setup for this.
I seen on YouTube that there are pictures of Joe. he's already dead.
He was. He should have stepped aside before the primaries were started, and >> certainly before they were over. Instead, you had a whole bunch of
Democrats who knew better trying to tell America that he was ok.
He should have, he could have.. Biden is OK.
There is no contraversy around it.
If you don't mind that your party will bow to pressure from celebrities then, yeah, there is no controversy.
What celebrity are you refering to?
If you don't mind that your party will lie to you about the mental health of
their presumptive candidate just to win an election, only to start telling the truth after he bombs in a debate,
That is the republican party lies.
He should have, he could have.. Biden is OK.
If he is OK mentally, why were so many Democrats and supporters calling for him to step down? Did you miss that?
What celebrity are you refering to?
After the debate, the following celebrities (and this is not all of them) started pressuring the party to ask Biden to step down.
The Obamas are no longer in politics (supposedly) so I would throw them into the celebrity category as well.
That is the republican party lies.
Prove to me that Clooney, the Obamas, HRC, Pelosi, and several other *Democrats*, who requested that he step down because of his mental health, are *Republicans* and I will have to agree with you.
Otherwise, only someone with an agenda, their head in the sand, or some cognitive problems of their own believes that Biden was A-OK right up until the debate.
I am also curious to see how it goes. With the Obamas throwing their support behind Kamala yesterday, I don't see how it can go another way.
That said, I think that the Trump team is smart not to schedule a debate, or
to engage with her too much in general, until after the convention.
Otherwise, only someone with an agenda, their head in the sand, or some cognitive problems of their own believes that Biden was A-OK right up until the debate.
Biden was/is OK. He didn't have a good debate but in spite of that he is OK.
Biden was/is OK. He didn't have a good debate but in spite of that he is OK.
As I said, only someone... with cognitive problems of their own...
I see the strength of the economy under the Biden administration.Fantasy Island was a great TV show.
The economy did not do as well under Trump.I could facts and stats of the Trump Era vs Biden Era.
I see the strength of the economy under the Biden administration.Fantasy Island was a great TV show.
The Biden Administration has demonstrated Incredible Weakness.
Would you like examples?
The economy did not do as well under Trump.I could facts and stats of the Trump Era vs Biden Era.
Instead, I will simply say PUSU.
How many times can white-out be applied to a bumper sticker? This will be ye another test for the American people ;)
There is nothing to show, and if you can't provide the facts that support the narrative or your point(s) then it is a baseless claim and words that mean absolutely nothing.I see the strength of the economy under the Biden administration.Fantasy Island was a great TV show.
I agree, it was a great show but that is not what we are talking about.
The Biden Administration has demonstrated Incredible Weakness.
Would you like examples?
The Biden administration has shown strength. The US economy is at an all time high because of that strength.
I've seen your examples any they prove nothing.
The economy did not do as well under Trump.I could facts and stats of the Trump Era vs Biden Era.
Instead, I will simply say PUSU.
The facts are in now. I don't need to put up anything, just have a look.
The facts are in now. I don't need to put up anything, just have a look.There is nothing to show, and if you can't provide the facts that support the narrative or your point(s) then it is a baseless claim and words that mean absolutely nothing.
The truth is that Biden sucked on just about everything, and now poor Kamala wants to re-event her image, hiding from her history and her previous responsibility as border zar.
(she sucked so badly at this) this is a title
that she as well as the media want to erase. (so be mindful) of also denying this because I will provide a video that will lock this in permanently.
She wants the American people to look and treat her differently - then what her nasty past actually shows.
Gregory Deyss wrote to Alan Ianson <=-
There is nothing to show, and if you can't provide the facts that
support the narrative or your point(s) then it is a baseless claim and words that mean absolutely nothing.
previous responsibility as border zar. (she sucked so badly at this)
this is a title that she as well as the media want to erase.
There is no such thing as a border czar. Never was.I told you that I was gonna show you the video. https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HLhDr-XHt7Q
There is no such thing as a border czar. Never was.I told you that I was gonna show you the video.
On Harris's X account (formerly twitter) on 04/21/17 @ 7:38 pm she had this to
say "An undocumented immigrant is not a criminal"
and yet undocumented immigrants have killed many Americans, including Police.
Documented cases undocumented illegal immigrants committing heinous acts datin >from 2024 to 2007 https://www.fairus.org/issue/examples-serious-crimes-illegal
aliens
There is NO escaping this truth and there is NO MORE denying or hiding from this, nonetheless, I know you will still try, It is rather foolish, to deny this, especially when there factual evidence to the contrary.
I told you I have already seen the video and heard the talking points.You're not telling me anything, this is far more than mere talking points. This is the order that you said did not exist.
Undocumented immigrants commit crimes at much lower rates than natural born citizens. This is old news.So that makes it ok eh?
Undocumented immigrants commit crimes at much lower rates than naturalSo that makes it ok eh?
born citizens. This is old news.
You think the families of the deceased care the rate?
How about? their deaths were completely avoidable.
How about holding those that were irresponsible and did nothing to stop it.
They are ALL going back.. Every last one of them...
Undocumented immigrants commit crimes at much lower rates than natural >> born citizens. This is old news.So that makes it ok eh?
You think the families of the deceased care the rate?
How about? their deaths were completely avoidable.
How about holding those that were irresponsible and did nothing to stop i
There are remedies in the law.
There are remedies in the law.
The law? Yes I am very much a law biding citizen too.
These crimes - including MURDER have been already been committed.
The law.. within my reference is a after-thought.
What was the answer, is still the answer for the future.
SECURE THE BORDER!!! I am not talking about ending asylum-seeking program. People sneaking into the country must end, and the gotta aways must end too.
Not everyone who comes the U.S. from the south of border is a criminal, but there more then a few; there would have to be (more then just a few bad apples) to account for all the tragedies that have occurred.
They are ALL going back, every single one of them who entered illegally!
Countries that they are coming from must bare responsibility as well, it can be assumed that they don't want these people either.
Kill two birds with one stone, get rid of their problem people out of their country and send then to the U.S. and let us deal with them.
That is one of the things that the useless Vice President was talking about when she was talking about finding the root causes, as per usual she did not finish what she started. She was infective as she is unqualified, to spite what Joe Biden thought he knew when he put Kamala Harris in charge of the border aka Border Czar.
There must be a process to vet these people.
The Biden Administration has not handled the border effectively or efficiently.. The Homeland Secretary Alejandro Mayorkas tells us with his wide Cuban eyes that the border is secure, no it's not secure, not even remotely secure. If it was then none of these heinous acts would be occurring.
Biden was ready to sign the negotiated border deal. It was killed by republicans at DJT's request.That excuse is not going to work. Did Trump need permission from anyone for the stay in Mexico policy. No. All Biden had to put these policies back to action, he never should touched or changed it - he Biden - opened up the floodgates
No there is not this is why they are called undocumented.There must be a process to vet these people.
There is.
The democrats also tried to put more border gaurds in place, that was
also shot down by republicans.
Biden was and currently is the President.Biden was ready to sign the negotiated border deal. It was killed byThat excuse is not going to work.
republicans at DJT's request.
That is not an excuse. Biden was going to sign the deal before DJT
killed it.
Biden was ready to sign the negotiated border deal. It was killed by republicans at DJT's request.
Biden was and currently is the President.
It wasn't a border deal - it was a Ukraine deal.
It was a great deal negotiated by Sen. James Lankford and others. It was not connected to Ukraine.
Too bad it failed, life goes on.
It was a great deal negotiated by Sen. James Lankford and others. It was
not connected to Ukraine.
But you said it was killed by Trump; that's different from when a bill
fails. A bill fails when it fails to reach the senate, or when it fails to pass the senate, or when the president vetoes it.
Cmon dude - you can't believe that, right???I don't know, what you think you know about me but I am definitely not a fan. Do I think someone else is pulling the strings, absolutely.
Gregory Deyss wrote to Alan Ianson <=-
The Democrats are using these people for votes. why wouldn't they vote
for democrats, they are getting free everything when they come here. housing, health care, education for the young, food, social security.
But you said it was killed by Trump; that's different from when a bill fails. A bill fails when it fails to reach the senate, or when it fails pass the senate, or when the president vetoes it.
Trump publicly asked congress to kill the bill and they obliged..
Trump publicly asked congress to kill the bill and they obliged..
Trump is a US citizen, just like me. I ask congress to do things sometimes, and sometimes they do what I ask, but they're not obligated to do what I say nor what former President Trump says.
If what you're saying it true, and it's definitely not, then this means that Trump saved America from the legalization of thousands of illegal migrants per day.
Either way, Trump's a hero.
But you said it was killed by Trump; that's different from when a bill fails. A bill fails when it fails to reach the senate, or when it fails
pass the senate, or when the president vetoes it.
Trump publicly asked congress to kill the bill and they obliged..
Trump is a US citizen, just like me. I ask congress to do things sometimes, an
sometimes they do what I ask, but they're not obligated to do what I say nor what former President Trump says.
Unlike you or I, Trump was again running for President and didn't want
his rival (who was then Biden) to be able to take credit for fixing something. Johnson, and many others in Congress, acted on the orders
from Trump to kill the bill.
Alan is not usually right, but he is here.
If what you're saying it true, and it's definitely not, then this means
that
Trump saved America from the legalization of thousands of illegal migrants
per day.
Trump has not/will not save America.
It's up to American's to save themselves from Trump and his kind.
Either way, Trump's a hero.
Trump is a common criminal.
Alan is not usually right, but he is here.
You and Alan might both be right that Trump made a request to congress, although I have not heard or seen it. But "orders?" How does Trump "order" congress to do anything, while president or ex-president?
Also, how can you say for sure that Trump wanted the legislation passed just t
boost his campaign?
Trump has control over a significant follower base. If Johnson had ignored Trump's "request," all Trump would have to do is say "RINO" and that follower base would have been all over Johnson, or any other Republican that didn't follow the order.
Trump has control over a significant follower base. If Johnson had ignored Trump's "request," all Trump would have to do is say "RINO" and that follower base would have been all over Johnson, or any other Republican that didn't follow the order.
Sometimes people tell people to do something that they are already in the process of doing. If my rep voted in favor of the bill, I'd be angry with my rep.
Sometimes people tell people to do something that they are already in th process of doing. If my rep voted in favor of the bill, I'd be angry wit rep.
It would have cut the flow down significantly, so I would have been ok with it as it would have been a better compromise than doing nothing and kicking the can down the road until Trump becomes President.
Sysop: | Coz |
---|---|
Location: | Anoka, MN |
Users: | 2 |
Nodes: | 4 (0 / 4) |
Uptime: | 139:24:48 |
Calls: | 166 |
Files: | 5,389 |
Messages: | 223,229 |