I have a question, g00r00 can answer, or anyone for that matter... Is there any reason why in the year 2022 other BBSes cannot support ANSI in the message bases/readers.
On 08 Mar 2022, IB Joe said the following...
I have a question, g00r00 can answer, or anyone for that matter... Is there any reason why in the year 2022 other BBSes cannot support ANSI the message bases/readers.
Modern BBS packages support ANSI in the message bases. Even some
"legacy" BBS packages support ANSI in the message bases (some with more success than others) while other BBS packages won't display ANSI at all (showing nothing but garbly goop).
Since this is a federated network and we can't control who sees what on which system we tend to cater to the lowest common denominator.
Some message networks allow ANSI in certain bases only (BBS ads for example) while others encourage adding an [ANSI] tag in the subject so those that can't display ANSI can skip those messages.
Jay
Modern BBS packages support ANSI in the message bases. Even some
"legacy" BBS packages support ANSI in the message bases (some with more
I have a question, g00r00 can answer, or anyone for that matter... Is
Some legacy software accidentally supports ANSI in messages because it spits out data to the terminal as its saved.
Mystic renders everything server-side and in the case of the message reader it presents it to you in a scrollable reading window.
I have a question, g00r00 can answer, or anyone for that matter... Is
I think the way Mystic handles this is just something no one else has
felt the need to support? I don't really have a reason why.
Sysop: | Coz |
---|---|
Location: | Anoka, MN |
Users: | 2 |
Nodes: | 4 (0 / 4) |
Uptime: | 08:21:35 |
Calls: | 340 |
Calls today: | 3 |
Files: | 5,979 |
Messages: | 231,252 |