Hello JOE MACKEY!
** On Monday 15.02.21 - 06:14, JOE MACKEY wrote to AUGUST ABOLINS:
I just finished watching the film last night. It is NOT very
good imho.
I have seen many movies that people would rave about
being the best ever, etc and think "What's the big deal?"
And don't get me started on critics. I have found any
film they pan I rather enjoy and the ones they bragged
about was nothing/seldom anything special.
I have had the same experience with some films. But this one
was NOT as effective as the book. In the book, you get a much
better sense of his growing obsession with the missing Laura. In
the film, there is far too much of going for the booze and
"wanna cigarette?" to fill in the apparently moody and
thoughtful moments that would be "explained" in the book.
All the actors seem to be playing thespian (like they are in
a stage play) ...their expressions and delivery seem to be
overly dramatic most of the time.
Always liked Clifton Webb's character. Webb was a bit
over the top with his acting.
Dana Andrews (the investigator) was cool and played the
character with restraint. Gene Tierny has a beautiful profile -
among other things. But Webb, kinda overdid some scenes.
Vincent Price was terrible and unconvincing.
At times Vincent Price was a bit a hammy. To me that was
part of his style.
True. But he found his niche in horror films in the 50's. I
forgot that he was in Edward Scissorhanads - a fine film that
takes advantage of his type-casting as an evil man, yet played
in a film that is basically a comedy and caters to the hammy
style that you mention.
My civilian boss a few years was nearly a double for Bea
Arthur in looks and personality.
I have identified several people in my town that could pass as
doubles for celebs. Myself, I would say that the Canadian
novelist Peter Robinson resembles me, but he's about 8 years
older than me and more overweight.
--
../|ug
--- OpenXP 5.0.48
* Origin: The past beats inside me like a second heart. J Banville, The Sea (2:221/1.58)