1. Forum
  2. FidoNet
  3. LINUX

  • zen kernel?

    From Maurice Kinal@1:153/7001 to Andy Alt on Sun Jun 14 01:29:44 2026
    Hey Andy!

    Linux version 7.0.11-zen1-1-zen (linux-zen@archlinux)
    (gcc (GCC) 16.1.1 20260430, GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.46.0)
    #1 ZEN SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Tue, 02 Jun 2026 18:26:42 +0000

    That doesn't look right. Instead of gcc and probably GNU ld, shouldn't it be rustc and llvm's linker (ld) ?
    At the moment I can't compile a kernel with llvm's ld but did manage to compile one with clang and booted it up.

    <Esc>:read /proc/version
    Linux version 7.0.12 (root@itsii) (clang version 22.1.0, GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.46.0.20260210) #1 SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Sun Jun 14 00:56:44 UTC 2026

    This reminds me of Mandrake claim to be the ONLY native clang based distribution which when I loaded their kernel proved to be gcc based. It waasn't long after that they went MIA. Also Debian and their eglibc bullshit but that was different. I had a LFS built with eglibc and despite it working saw absolutely no good reason to ditch glibc.

    However I saw a doc about this particular subject and just might take another stab at getting a rustc kernel booting once I figure it out. My motivation you ask? I see a posible chance to one-up archlinux. :::most evil grin:::

    Life is good,
    Maurice

    -o -o o- -o o- o- -o -o -o -o -o -o
    (\ (\ /) (\ /) /) (\ (\ (\ (\ (\ (\
    ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^
    ... Seldan snottor guma sorgleas blissað.
    Seldom does a wise man rejoice without sorrow.
    --- GNU bash, version 5.3.9(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
    * Origin: Little Mikey's Brain - Ladysmith BC, Canada (1:153/7001)
  • From Andy Alt@1:153/757 to Maurice Kinal on Mon Jun 22 08:44:10 2026
    Maurice Kinal wrote to Andy Alt <=-

    Hey Andy!

    Linux version 7.0.11-zen1-1-zen (linux-zen@archlinux)
    (gcc (GCC) 16.1.1 20260430, GNU ld (GNU Binutils) 2.46.0)
    #1 ZEN SMP PREEMPT_DYNAMIC Tue, 02 Jun 2026 18:26:42 +0000

    That doesn't look right. Instead of gcc and probably GNU ld, shouldn't
    it be rustc and llvm's linker (ld) ?
    At the moment I can't compile a kernel with llvm's ld but did manage to compile one with clang and booted it up.

    I dunno. Out of my area of experience. Although, I can tell you with absolute confidence that I didn't modify the output.
    :)

    My motivation you ask? I see a posible chance to one-up archlinux.
    :::most evil grin:::

    A challenge like that that sounds like a worthy goal. :)

    --
    -Andy
    Website: https://andy5995.github.io


    ... DalekDOS v(overflow): (I)Obey (V)ision impaired (E)xterminate
    -+- MultiMail/Linux v0.53

    --- BBBS/Li6 v4.10 Toy-7
    * Origin: The Rusty MailBox - Penticton, BC Canada (1:153/757)
  • From Maurice Kinal@1:153/7001 to Andy Alt on Mon Jun 22 17:15:20 2026
    Hey Andy!

    I can tell you with absolute confidence that I didn't modify the
    output.

    It looks legitimate from this angle. I was questioning what makes it a zen kernel and as of my last post on the subject thought my first and probably last attempt, was far more what I believe /proc/version ought to look like given the claim.

    A challenge like that that sounds like a worthy goal.

    So far I can tell you with much confidence that it was a lot of work and far too much extra bloat. I am sticking with gcc.

    Дуже груви,
    Maurice

    -o -o o- -o o- -o -o o- -o -o o- o-
    (\ (\ /) (\ /) (\ (\ /) (\ (\ /) /)
    ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^ ^^
    ... Sceal bryde beag, bec leornere, husl halgum men.
    A ring for a bride, books for a student, the Host for holy men.
    --- GNU bash, version 5.3.12(1)-release (x86_64-pc-linux-gnu)
    * Origin: Little Mikey's Brain - Ladysmith BC, Canada (1:153/7001)