1. Forum
  2. FidoNet
  3. FUTURE4FIDO

  • Theoretically, what would be the min

    From August Abolins@2:221/360 to Tommi Koivula on Thu Nov 5 18:01:44 2020
    On 05/11/2020 9:33 a.m., Tommi Koivula : Charles Pierson wrote:

    Would one system qualify as a network?

    There was no requirement of a network. Just "nodelist"
    and "operate properly".

    Just one is enough.


    "That will be Fidonet, party of one, please." Doesn't sound like
    too much fun. :(


    --
    ../|ug

    --- TB(Stealth)/Win7
    * Origin: nntp://rbb.fidonet.fi - Lake Ylo - Finland (2:221/360.0)
  • From Charles Pierson@2:240/1120.976 to Nick Andre on Thu Nov 5 11:22:56 2020
    Hello, Nick Andre.
    On 11/5/20 11:25 AM you wrote:

    On 05 Nov 20 08:36:25, Charles Pierson said the following to Nick
    Andre:
    Theoretically, what would be the minimum number of Fidonet
    systems required implement the current nodelist model or
    structure to operate properly? NA> One. Would one system
    qualify as a network?
    The question specifically asked the minimum required to implement
    the nodelist to operate correctly.

    I could have sworn that I saw network in the question. My mistake.

    One only needs to install a mailer and compile a nodelist. The
    nodelist itself can even have just one entry and since that would
    most likely be the Zone definition, that one system "is" the
    network.

    I see your point. That's what I get for reading messages with 3 hours of sleep in the last 48.


    --
    Best regards!
    Posted using Hotdoged on Android
    --- Hotdoged/2.13.5/Android
    * Origin: Houston, TX (2:240/1120.976)
  • From Charles Pierson@2:240/1120.976 to August Abolins on Thu Nov 5 11:26:30 2020
    Hello, August Abolins.
    On 11/5/20 6:01 PM you wrote:

    On 05/11/2020 9:33 a.m., Tommi Koivula : Charles Pierson wrote:
    Would one system qualify as a network?
    There was no requirement of a network. Just "nodelist" and
    "operate properly". Just one is enough.
    "That will be Fidonet, party of one, please." Doesn't sound like
    too much fun. :(

    Only one system. That doesn't prohibit multiple users using Telnet, dial up or any other type of access you might have from participating. Or even point systems, since generally points aren't on the node list.

    --
    Best regards!
    Posted using Hotdoged on Android
    --- Hotdoged/2.13.5/Android
    * Origin: Houston, TX (2:240/1120.976)
  • From Charles Pierson@2:240/1120.976 to Tommi Koivula on Thu Nov 5 11:27:08 2020
    Hello, Tommi Koivula.
    On 11/5/20 4:33 PM you wrote:

    Theoretically, what would be the minimum number of Fidonet
    systems required implement the current nodelist model or
    structure to operate properly? NA> One. Would one system
    qualify as a network?
    There was no requirement of a network. Just "nodelist" and
    "operate properly". Just one is enough. :)

    I've noticed.

    --
    Best regards!
    Posted using Hotdoged on Android
    --- Hotdoged/2.13.5/Android
    * Origin: Houston, TX (2:240/1120.976)