Hi Carlos,
On 2021-10-23 12:41:30, you wrote to me:
If the hub has multiple (up)links that is normal, and can be expected
in todays fidonet (it's called redundancy! ;-)). As long as your dupe
detection is working ok, there is nothing to worry about.
Wouldn't it be better then, for maximum redundancy, to stop using SEENBYs, at least in nodes that have multiple fidoweb-style links *and* good dupe detection?
We don't want or need "maximum" redundancy. "Good" redundancy is good enough! ;-)
And unfortunately dupe checking isn't perfect in a lot of software that is currently used. Some software doesn't even check dupes before sending mail forward to their links (only on importing to their message base). That's why I sometimes see paths like this in my dupes area:
@PATH: 387/26 396/45 280/464 203/0 230/0 150 261/38 396/45
^^^^^^ ^^^^^^^ ^^^^^^
The message this line was from already passed through 396/45 and my system. Somewhere between us seenby's were stripped. But still 396/45 forwarded it to me for the second time. That wouldn't happen if it did dupe checking before forwarding. So without seenby checking and without better dupe checking, the number of dupes would explode, and some messages would probably go arround in circles forever... So it's an interesting idea to stop seenby checking, but in the current fidonet it would cause problems...
Bye, Wilfred.
--- FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815
* Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464)