Wednesday July 01 2020, Ruslan Suleimanov wrote to All:
I find that my some ECHO file size stop on 2048 MB...
-rw-r--r-- 1 rfido rfido 2147484864 31 мая 02:00
RU.SEX.SIMVOL.sqd
If the file is on FAT32, copy it to some better file system.
Michael
I find that my some ECHO file size stop on 2048 MB...
-rw-r--r-- 1 rfido rfido 2147484864 31 мая 02:00
RU.SEX.SIMVOL.sqd
If the file is on FAT32, copy it to some better file system.No, this file in unix. BSD UFS
I find that my some ECHO file size stop on 2048 MB...
-rw-r--r-- 1 rfido rfido 2147484864 31 мая 02:00 RU.SEX.SIMVOL.sqd
It is not a filesystem problem.I find that my some ECHO file size stop on 2048 MB...If the file is on FAT32, copy it to some better file system.
-rw-r--r-- 1 rfido rfido 2147484864 31 мая 02:00
RU.SEX.SIMVOL.sqd
I find that my some ECHO file size stop on 2048 MB...
-rw-r--r-- 1 rfido rfido 2147484864 31 мая 02:00
RU.SEX.SIMVOL.sqd
If the file is on FAT32, copy it to some better file system.It is not a filesystem problem.
It is INT_MAX (signed dword) limitation - hardcoded thing for the
fidonet.
How to change limit or what database better in HTP ?
I find that my some ECHO file size stop on 2048 MB...
If the file is on FAT32, copy it to some better file system.
It is INT_MAX (signed dword) limitation - hardcoded thing for the
fidonet.
Fidonet is not a code or a msgbase specification.
I find that my some ECHO file size stop on 2048 MB...
-rw-r--r-- 1 rfido rfido 2147484864 31 ╨╝╨░╤П 02:00 RU.SEX.SIMVOL.sqd
Now in htp.log:
-- cut --
1 19:28:00 Could not open /fido/msgbase/RU.SEX.SIMVOL
-- cit --
Please help ! How to up limit ?
In the Squish MsgAPI doc I see only 32 bit unsinged integers used for
frame offsets (FOFS). A 32 bit signed integer is not mentioned. The limit should be 4096 MB not 2048 MB. Maybe an implementation issue? If I understand the Squish format correctly it is not possible to have *.sqd files bigger than 4096 MB without breaking compatibility though.
JAM does not have the limitations that squish has... it has its own limitations but they allow for larger areas than most other message base formats...
JAM does not have the limitations that squish has... it has its own
limitations but they allow for larger areas than most other message
base formats...
What are the Jam limitations? (Just preparing for what I might be in for...)
Squish can store dates up to 2107-12-31 (dos time).
Hi Oli,
On 2020-07-03 08:51:39, you wrote to Deon George:
Squish can store dates up to 2107-12-31 (dos time).
And because of that it has a 2 second resolution. (It drops the least significant bit of the seconds, when it stores a message) Which has been causing problems in the net, in the past...
Squish can store dates up to 2107-12-31 (dos time).
And because of that it has a 2 second resolution. (It drops the least
significant bit of the seconds, when it stores a message) Which has
been causing problems in the net, in the past...
The original time string is preserved and stored in the Squish message base
and should be used on rescan. If it's not then it is a problem/bug of the tosser, not really a problem of the Squish format. E.g. Squish (the tosser)
does preserve the original date for rescanned/exported messages just fine.
hpt does write the __ftsc_date field, but does not use it us it for exported messages that are rescanned (as in areafix RESCAN command). Maybe the problems were caused by hpt. Maybe there are other programs that don't stick to the specification. Maybe problems were created by copying / converting messages from JAM to Squish or from Squish to JAM.
Ok, will be use JAM. Thanks.
Sysop: | Coz |
---|---|
Location: | Anoka, MN |
Users: | 2 |
Nodes: | 4 (0 / 4) |
Uptime: | 139:08:35 |
Calls: | 166 |
Files: | 5,389 |
Messages: | 223,229 |