On 01-02-23 18:44, Alexander Koryagin <=-
spoke to Martin Kukac about Ukrainian Blitzkrieg expl <=-
You don't know what are you speaking about. Waiting is better that hundreds of thousand of deaths inevitable if fight with such vast
enemy as Russia now and in future. And, besides, the war could be
avoided at all -- Russia's demanded before war consisted of demanding reasonable concessions towards Russian minority in Ukraine.
For instance, the US invaded Syria to defend the people who are
oppressed according to Washington. Isn't it an interference which is
being continued even now? What did the US did with Noriega in Panama
when he started to behave independently?
Your problem (and Putin's) is they were not Russian, they were
Russian speaking Ukranians. Russia had no business interfering
with internal Ukranian affairs on any pretext.
For instance, the US invaded Syria to defend the people who are
oppressed according to Washington. Isn't it an interference which is
being continued even now?
What did the US did with Noriega in Panama when he started to behave independently?
On 01-04-23 12:00, Alexander Koryagin <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Ukrainian Blitzkrieg <=-
You don't know what are you speaking about. Waiting is
better that hundreds of thousand of deaths inevitable if
fight with such vast enemy as Russia now and in future.
And, besides, the war could be avoided at all -- Russia's
demands before war consisted of demanding reasonable
concessions towards Russian minority in Ukraine.
Your problem (and Putin's) is they were not Russian, they were
Russian speaking Ukranians. Russia had no business interfering
with internal Ukranian affairs on any pretext.
For instance, the US invaded Syria to defend the people who are
oppressed according to Washington. Isn't it an interference which is being continued even now? What did the US did with Noriega in Panama
when he started to behave independently?
Probably the recent news about shelling an American base in Syria was inaccurate. ;-)
How would you describe Russia's actions in Syria?
The ties Russia and Syria roots from the time of the USSR. Syria was
always an Russia's ally.
The US had provoked a civil war in Syria and in
this war 600 thousand people were killed. https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casualties_of_the_Syrian_civil_war
As a Chinese saying tells -- never provoke a war if you are not sure you
can win it.
Well, the blitzkrieg has failed -- now Russia fights with NATO which
How would you describe Russia's actions in Syria?
The ties Russia and Syria roots from the time of the USSR. Syria was always an Russia's ally. The US had provoked a civil war in Syria and
in this war 600 thousand people were killed.
Your problem (and Putin's) is they were not Russian, they were
Russian speaking Ukranians. Russia had no business interfering
with internal Ukranian affairs on any pretext.
For instance, the US invaded Syria to defend the people who are
oppressed according to Washington. Isn't it an interference which is
being continued even now? What did the US did with Noriega in Panama
when he started to behave independently?
When someone has no answer in a debate with respect to a question raised and then resorts to a "what about" response -- THEY LOSE.
In other words, respond to the topic -- don't try to change the subject.
As a Chinese saying tells -- never provoke a war if you are not sure you can win it.
Well, the blitzkrieg has failed -- now Russia fights with NATO which use Ukraine like a puppet at the fair puppet theater, putting his hairy hand into Ukraine's ... from behind. ;-)
But NATO is not fighting with Russia :)
NATO uses Ukraininans as war robots. They are too smart to fight
Well, the blitzkrieg has failed -- now Russia fights withBut NATO is not fighting with Russia :)
NATO which
NATO uses Ukraininans as war robots. They are too smart to fight Russia themsleves. ;-)
Sure, but how would you describe Russia's actions in Syria?
They are mainly peacekeepers. The main question in Syria who is called "terrorists".
The US had provoked a civil war in Syria and in this war 600
thousand people were killed.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Casualties_of_the_Syrian_civil_war
This is what happens in war and that is why we should avoid it.
There is no doubt who instigated the civil war in Syria -- the US. Maybe Asssad rigged the elections, but it was not an excuse for a civil war.
The US wanted an uprising and it managed to get it. The same policy the
US had conducted in Ukraine when they instigate the mutiny against
Ukrainian elected president. The US officials even visited the
barricades in Kiev in 2014.
Bye, Alan!
Alexander Koryagin
fido.fidonews,local.cc.ak 2023
--- Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:31.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/31.7.0
Yeah, it is a remote control war.
If Russian forces had been fighting NATO forces, this war would
have been over a long time ago.
In this case Putin would probably A-bombed a couple western capitals, knowing well that it would be a good lesson and nobody will start a
total nuclear war for complete Earth destruction. Rich people in the
West want live very much, and in healthy environment. ;)
After Hiroshima and Nagasaki were atomized, Hirohito gave in
to Truman's demand. And no more atomic bombs fell on Japanese
cities.
After Hiroshima and Nagasaki were atomized, Hirohito gave in
to Truman's demand. And no more atomic bombs fell on Japanese
cities.
One of the reasons for that was only three bombs had been made and all were
expended in a test and two droppings. No more ready available fission-material.
| Sysop: | Coz |
|---|---|
| Location: | Anoka, MN |
| Users: | 2 |
| Nodes: | 4 (0 / 4) |
| Uptime: | 192:23:05 |
| Calls: | 184 |
| Calls today: | 1 |
| Files: | 5,413 |
| Messages: | 222,766 |