Freedom of Speech is, like all freedoms, binary. Either you have it
or you do not. There is no middle way.
@CHRS: CP850 2[...]
Voltaire (François-Marie Arouet) did not actually say it, it was^
Voltaire (François-Marie Arouet) did not actually say it, it
^
I noticed that the encoding does not match, so the ç (c-cedilla)
is mangled. Looks like it was actually written with latin-1.
Your observation is correct. This problem is:
A) A relic of the ASCII only era of Fidonet.
B) The failure of the Fidonet community to deal with extended
character sets in a consistent way.
The problem often manifests itself when article contain text copied
and pasted from the Internet. A logical solution would be that the Fidonews editor issues an edict that says alll articles submitted
should be in either plain ASCCI or in UTF-8.
Anyway, I would suggest to the editor that the robot doesn't post the Snooze to this echo using a specific @CHRS kludge... or at least it is converted to match it.
That may work for the echo, it would not work for the magazine published
as a file.
EDITORIAL
Freedom of Speech
This subject seems to be more and more difficult to understand by some people for each year that passes. Not only in FidoNet but worse than
that, all over the entire world.
Freedom of Speech is, like all freedoms, binary. Either you have it
or you do not. There is no middle way.
Voltaire (Franthois-Marie Arouet) did not actually say it, it was
Evelyn Beatrice Hall that interpreted his thoughts this way:
"I disapprove of what you say, but I will defend to the death your
right to say it."
Adolf Hitler, Joseph Stalin, Pol Pot, Kim Il-sung and all other
dictators we know of were all in favour of Freedom of Speech. As long
as that speech did not oppose to what they regarded as proper.
I'm constantly reminded of what a bad person I am to allow this or
that user to execute his Freedom of Speech in the FIDONEWS echo. "Ban him!" shouts the crowd. I.e. "No more Freedom of Speech here, unless
we like it!"
Freedom of Speech is, like all freedoms, binary. Either you have it
or you do not. There is no middle way.
Can't you really see what you are saying? Is it really that hard to
press the Next key if you find someone opposing to what you regard as proper?
After all, nobody is forcing you to read anything. Neither in a
FidoNet echo nor on Twitter, FaceBook, Fox News or wherever. Surely
you have more important matters to be upset with, or even angry with,
in your lives?
Once again:
Freedom of Speech is, like all freedoms, binary. Either you have it
or you do not.
It's your choice, be sure to choose well. Once you've lost it, it
can take ages to get it back, if ever.
Perhaps the editor is referring to the First Amendment of the
US Constitution, in which it says "Congress shall make no law ...
abridging freedom of speech."
BTW, I hadn't re-read the submission guidelines. It's already there:
ASCII is required or encouraged (though not strictly "plain ASCII")
Perhaps the editor is referring to the First Amendment of the
US Constitution, in which it says "Congress shall make no law ...
abridging freedom of speech."
Knowing who the author is, it is very unlikely he would make references to US legal documents with dubious standing.
That US constitution can be used, in a matter of speech, to prove that the sun did not rise this morning completely ignoring the fact that it is light. Per the US Constitution extra terrestrials already are among us ...
ASCII == "American Standard Code for Information Interchange", and they don't need more symbols in the US. ;)
Perhaps the editor is referring to the First Amendment of the
US Constitution, in which it says "Congress shall make no law ...
abridging freedom of speech."
Knowing who the author is, it is very unlikely he would make references
to US legal documents with dubious standing.
That US constitution can be used, in a matter of speech, to prove that
the sun did not rise this morning completely ignoring the fact that it
is light. Per the US Constitution extra terrestrials already are among
us ...
ASCII == "American Standard Code for InformationBut is it ASCII-1963, ASCII-1965 or ASCII-1968? :)
Interchange", and they don't need more symbols in the US. ;)
Hi, Anna Christina Nass!
I read your message from 10.06.2021 12:58
ASCII == "American Standard Code for Information
Interchange", and they don't need more symbols in the US. ;)
But is it ASCII-1963, ASCII-1965 or ASCII-1968? :)
ASCII with 256 symbols probably may be called not plain but extended?
Sysop: | Coz |
---|---|
Location: | Anoka, MN |
Users: | 2 |
Nodes: | 4 (0 / 4) |
Uptime: | 142:51:18 |
Calls: | 166 |
Files: | 5,389 |
Messages: | 223,270 |