Did anyone notice the reporter at today's Coronavirus briefing trying to complain about the side-effects of life-saving coronavirus drugs?
She kept insisting: "You don't know what the side-effects will be like
for the patients." & Trump was like "Well I know that one side-effect is living instead of dying."
Why are people so Cross?
They are seething in vile hatred.
Why are people so Cross?
Simple they are now unhinged so much, now their actions as are easily identified within a glance. They are no longer trying to hide it.
They are seething in vile hatred.
On 04-07-20 19:48, Aaron Thomas <=-
spoke to All about Tuesday Briefing <=-
Did anyone notice the reporter at today's Coronavirus briefing trying
to complain about the side-effects of life-saving coronavirus drugs?
She kept insisting: "You don't know what the side-effects will be like
for the patients." & Trump was like "Well I know that one side-effect
is living instead of dying."
Why are people so Cross?
Simple they are now unhinged so much, now their actions as are easily identified within a glance. They are no longer trying to hide it. They are seething in vile hatred.
There is more to the story, but of course you left that part out,
because it does not fit your narrative.
There is more to the story, but of course you left that part out,
because it does not fit your narrative.
Once was kinda slick, now you just look like a dam fool. &
Oh yeah, still not effective by the way..
Did anyone notice the reporter at today's Coronavirus briefing trying to >complain about the side-effects of life-saving coronavirus drugs?
She kept insisting: "You don't know what the side-effects will be like for >the patients." & Trump was like "Well I know that one side-effect is living >instead of dying."
Hello Aaron,
Did anyone notice the reporter at today's Coronavirus briefing trying to >complain about the side-effects of life-saving coronavirus drugs?
She kept insisting: "You don't know what the side-effects will be like fo >the patients." & Trump was like "Well I know that one side-effect is livi >instead of dying."
The snake oil the president keeps trying to sell does not work.
Did anyone notice the reporter at today's Coronavirus briefing trying to complain about the side-effects of life-saving coronavirus drugs?
She kept insisting: "You don't know what the side-effects will be like
for the patients." & Trump was like "Well I know that one side-effect is living instead of dying."
Once was kinda slick, now you just look like a dam fool. &
. ______ ÚÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ¿ ÚÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ¿ ÚÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ¿ ÚÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ¿
_[]_³³Äij³ ³ Fidonet ³ ³FSX Net³ ³ Trump ³ ³ Another Message ³
{ NET 267 ³ ³1:267/150³ ³21:1/127³ ³ Train ³ ³ by Gregory ³
/ 00ÄÄÄÄ00'-¨€ÀÄ00ÄÄÄ00ÄÙ¨€ÀÄ00ÄÄ00ÄÙ¨€ÀÄ00Ä00ÄÙ¨€ÀÄÄ00ÄÄÄÄÄÄÄÄ00ÄÄÄÙ
They are seething in vile hatred.
Every time they try to make an attack, their plan goes awry. I'm sure that's frustrating. Democrats are like the Baltimore Ravens trying to
beat the NY Giants.
Hydroxychloroquine does work
there have documented cases from around the
world and here in the U.S.A.
Did anyone notice the reporter at today's Coronavirus briefing AT>tryingto complain about the side-effects of life-saving AT>coronavirus drugs?
Where did you go to medical school?
There is no evidence that those drugs are "life-saving"
with respect to conoravirus. All that Trump's dipshittery
has done here is cause a run on them, so that the people
who actually NEED them for things that they're known to
work for (like Lupus) can't get them. And then people
will take them and possibly kill themselves.
But the illogic scenario is this: 100 people get COVID-19
and with no pharmacological intervention, on average 1 of
them will die as a result. 99 will live.
Now, 100 people will get COVID-19 and take Dr Trump's
magical snake oil. On average, 1 will still die of COVID-19
or its complications. Another will die from the side
effects of said snakeoil. But now 98 will walk around
claiming that they were cured! by Dr Trump.
Without an actual study to show the efficacy of the drug,
that's how it happens.
She kept insisting: "You don't know what the side-effects will AT>be likefor the patients." & Trump was like "Well I know that one AT>side-effect is living instead of dying."
The president of the American Medical Association disagrees
with the guy who started a fake university. Who are you
going to side with?
LL> >Did anyone notice the reporter at today's Coronavirus briefing
trying to
LL> >complain about the side-effects of life-saving coronavirus drugs?
LL> >
LL> >She kept insisting: "You don't know what the side-effects will be
like fo
LL> >the patients." & Trump was like "Well I know that one side-effect is livi
LL> >instead of dying."
LL>
LL> The snake oil the president keeps trying to sell does not work.
Hydroxychloroquine does work there have documented cases from around the
world and here in the U.S.A.
Based upon the facts, it sounds like the hatred for Trump is more important
to some people with TDS than it is for people to recover from Covid-19
Hope you like it HOT! There is a special place in Hell reserved just for you
but you had better make room because more will be joining you as your flesh melts.
Correct -- that was not a good moment for Trump. He could have answered the question instead of resorting to snide remark. But then as the
Not only are you a clown, but you look like someone
who failed clown school.
On 04-08-20 17:15, Gregory Deyss <=-
spoke to Lee Lofaso about Re: Tuesday Briefing <=-
Hydroxychloroquine does work there have documented cases from around
the world and here in the U.S.A.
Based upon the facts, it sounds like the hatred for Trump is more important to some people with TDS than it is for people to recover from Covid-19
Hydroxychloroquine does work
No it doesn't.
there have documented cases from around the
world and here in the U.S.A.
No there haven't.
There have been no controlled studies showing the efficacy
of hydroxychloroquine for treating COVID-19. Not a single
one. The only data that exists is anecdotal, and that
doesn't pass muster.
Aaron Thomas wrote to All <=-
Did anyone notice the reporter at today's Coronavirus briefing trying
to complain about the side-effects of life-saving coronavirus drugs?
She kept insisting: "You don't know what the side-effects will be like
for the patients." & Trump was like "Well I know that one side-effect
is living instead of dying."
Why are people so Cross?
The snake oil the president keeps trying to sell does not work.
So Fox News is paying people to say that it "saved their life" and your news
stations are paying people to say "It killed me?"
During today's campaign event, Dr. Trump clarified his comments
The snake oil the president keeps trying to sell does not work.
Hydroxychloroquine does work there have documented cases from around the
world and here in the U.S.A.
Based upon the facts, it sounds like the hatred for Trump is more important
to some people with TDS than it is for people to recover from Covid-19
Hope you like it HOT! There is a special place in Hell reserved just for you
but you had better make room because more will be joining you as your flesh melts.
Not only are you a clown, but you look like someone
who failed clown school.
Don't worry Dan, some day Trump will make a mistake and you will be able AT>to honestly say "See? That's a mistake!"
On 04-08-20 17:15, Gregory Deyss <=-
spoke to Lee Lofaso about Re: Tuesday Briefing <=-
We don't hate Trump -- we hate the way he has put the nation in jeopardy DS>and costs the lives of people by his inability to accept the truth about DS>the coming epidemic.
On 04-18-20 16:33, Tim Richardson <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Tuesday Briefing <=-
Trump spoke of the possibility of a `coming epidemic' in front of both houses of congress back in February. Nancy Pelosi doesn't know it (or won't admit it) since she tore his speech in pieces and had it
shredded!
In fact, he made statements about how it would just go away on its own
-- nothing to worry about. "This is like a flu" (Feb 26, 2020). It
was not until mid March that he began to acknowledge that it might
become a serious problem.
On 04-19-20 07:43, Gregory Deyss <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Tuesday Briefing <=-
In fact, he made statements about how it would just go away on its own
-- nothing to worry about. "This is like a flu" (Feb 26, 2020). It
was not until mid March that he began to acknowledge that it might
become a serious problem.
What do you think your doing? You're trying to minimize what the
President has said about the matter, that in it self is bad enough,
but
you didn't even mention or acknowledge that Nasty Nancy tore up the speech.
As I said, the rest of his diatribe was deleted. We have heard it multiple times before, and it signified little of importance. Yes The Speaker of the House expressed her disgust with his speech. She should not have done it in that way, but it was a one time thing -- unlike the frequent diversions and lies that Trump is making every day.
The entire point of this tread is how Trump's delay recognizing the seriousness of Covid-19 and in taking decisive action has cost many American lives. If he had taken the threat seriously even just a month sooner,
On 04-20-20 07:50, Gregory Deyss <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Tuesday Briefing <=-
As I said, the rest of his diatribe was deleted. We have heard it multiple times before, and it signified little of importance. Yes The Speaker of the House expressed her disgust with his speech. She should not have done it in that way, but it was a one time thing -- unlike the frequent diversions and lies that Trump is making every day.
You just can't help yourself to through in that last line, there is no comparison to what Pelosi did. I agree it was wrong for her to do so.
The entire point of this tread is how Trump's delay recognizing the seriousness of Covid-19 and in taking decisive action has cost many American lives. If he had taken the threat seriously even just a month sooner,
Again your failing to acknowledge that the action taken by Trump
closing the borders saved countless lives.
Trump also took swift action
directing the medical hospital ships to east and west coast, gave
orders for many hospitals to be constructed with many beds, many of
which were never used.
What would Biden of done, or more importantly what would he wouldn't
do. Would he of closed the borders, no he said so himself, which means more would of died.
You just can't help yourself to through in that last line, there is n comparison to what Pelosi did. I agree it was wrong for her to do so.
Correct -- there is little comparison between the single act of protest that Pelosi did and the multitude of lies that Trump feeds to his public every day. What Trump did and continues to do with spreading false information is much more damning.
Did it? He "closed the borders" and yet tens of thousands of people
came from China to the USA since then.
If you want to know what Biden would do
joebiden.com/covid19
Trump spoke of the possibility of a `coming epidemic' in front of both houses of congress back in February. Nancy Pelosi doesn't know it (or won't admit it) since she tore his speech in pieces and had it shredded!
In fact, he made statements about how it would just go away on its own >DS>-- nothing to worry about. "This is like a flu" (Feb 26, 2020). It >DS>was not until mid March that he began to acknowledge that it might >DS>become a serious problem.
What do you think your doing? You're trying to minimize what the President >has said about the matter, that in it self is bad enough, but you didn't
even
mention or acknowledge that Nasty Nancy tore up the speech. What I heard
within this speech was for the American people over and over again.
If you heard differently, I would be delighted to discuss it.
Why did she rip it up?
What could it be, that she did not like?
or is it that she was opposing the President because she thinks it is her
obligation to do so - to disagree no matter what, I think it was 10% that
and 90% ego as I think she believes it makes her look powerful, like a lioness.
but you didn't even mention or acknowledge that Nasty Nancy tore up thespeech.
... Yes The Speaker of the House expressed her disgust with his speech. She
should not have done it in that way, but it was a one time thing -- unlike the frequent diversions and lies that Trump is making every day.
The entire point of this tread is how Trump's delay recognizing the >seriousness of Covid-19 and in taking decisive action has cost many
American lives.
If he had taken the threat seriously even just a month sooner, perhaps the
USA would not have had several times more infections
than any other country.
We had time to prepare, and he squandered it away.
On 04-18-20 16:33, Tim Richardson <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Tuesday Briefing <=-
Trump spoke of the possibility of a `coming epidemic' in front of both houses of congress back in February. Nancy Pelosi doesn't know it (or
won't admit it) since she tore his speech in pieces and had it
shredded!
You are referring to the State of the Union address given on February 4, DS>2020. The word epidemic only occurs in connection to Aids and Opioid DS>addition.
The rest of your biased diatribe is not worth commenting on.
On 04-25-20 02:08, Tim Richardson <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Tuesday Briefing <=-
Trump spoke of the possibility of a `coming epidemic' in front of both houses of congress back in February. Nancy Pelosi doesn't know it (or won't admit it) since she tore his speech in pieces and had it
shredded!
You are referring to the State of the Union address given on February 4,
2020. The word epidemic only occurs in connection to Aids and Opioid
addition.
Oh! Did I make the mistake of using a word that Trump didn't use?
"We are coordinating with the Chinese government and working closely together on the coronavirus outbreak in China. My administration will
take all necessary steps to safeguard our citizens from this threat." ....Donald Trump during SOTU speech.
The rest of your biased diatribe is not worth commenting on.
Which saves me the trouble of having to sift through your usual drivel attempting to find a coherent sentence you may have accidently
blurted.
Like I said; you're just another goddamn democrat!
not until about mid march that he began to take it seriously. Even then
On 04-26-20 11:11, Aaron Thomas <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Tuesday Briefing <=-
not until about mid march that he began to take it seriously. Even then
What if instead of ever doing anything about the virus he had stayed
busy accusing people of stuff with weak evidence?
And if he were a
democrat? Then we'd all be happy as can be with our president - right?
On 04-25-20 02:08, Tim Richardson <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Tuesday Briefing <=-
Trump spoke of the possibility of a `coming epidemic' in front of both houses of congress back in February. Nancy Pelosi doesn't know it (or
won't admit it) since she tore his speech in pieces and had it
shredded!
You are referring to the State of the Union address given on February 4, DS>2020. The word epidemic only occurs in connection to Aids and Opioid DS>addition.
Oh! Did I make the mistake of using a word that Trump didn't use?
It was not the matter of a word, but of the lack of seriousness or DS>specificity in the minor three line two sentence throw away.
And his
lack of taking any of the necessary steps needed to safeguard our DS>citizens.
Watch what he does, not what he says. He downplayed the
treat for the next month as something that would soon blow over.
It was
not until about mid march that he began to take it seriously. Even then DS>he was all over the map in what to do about it.
"We are coordinating with the Chinese government and working closely together on the coronavirus outbreak in China. My administration will
take all necessary steps to safeguard our citizens from this threat." ....Donald Trump during SOTU speech.
The rest of your biased diatribe is not worth commenting on.
Like I said; you're just another goddamn democrat!
Don't like the message, dinigrate the messenger. Typical Trumpian DS>tactic. You have learned well at your lord and masters feet.
democrats just like you. There's a few conservatives left....but damn
Schools and universities are brainwashing kids and mis-educating them into thinking that we as Americans owe something to the rest of the world, and that whites owe something to blacks and natives, and that blacks & natives have reason to be resentful towards whites.
What does all that garbage get recycled into? Democrat voters.
Richard Falken wrote to Aaron Thomas <=-
What does all that garbage get recycled into? Democrat voters.
I honestly think that will be the downfall of modern Democrats.
See, since the Obama days, the Democratic party has been playing Identitary Politics to its advantage, dividing the population into
small, manageable groups, and telling them that their problem is one
big group. That works well in the short run (politically, I mean), but
it has a big problem.
It turns down that the big group, White Heterosexuals, are
a) an overwhelming majority
b) the most owerful engine in the economy.
When you turn your party line against their interests openly, what you are doing is creating a very big enemy for yourself. I think Identitary Politics when done to the extreme will result in the complete
oblitaration of the party pursuing them if they do it long enough.
Schools and universities are brainwashing kids and mis-educating them into >>thinking that we as Americans owe something to the rest of the world, and >>that whites owe something to blacks and natives, and that blacks & natives >>have reason to be resentful towards whites.
What does all that garbage get recycled into? Democrat voters.
I honestly think that will be the downfall of modern Democrats.
See, since the Obama days, the Democratic party has been playing Identitary
Politics to its advantage, dividing the population into small, manageable groups, and telling them that their problem is one big group. That works
well in the short run (politically, I mean), but it has a big problem.
It turns down that the big group, White Heterosexuals, are
a) an overwhelming majority
b) the most powerful engine in the economy.
When you turn your party line against their interests openly, what you are
doing is creating a very big enemy for yourself.
I think Identitary Politics when done to the extreme will result in the
complete oblitaration of the party pursuing them if they do it long enough.
doing is creating a very big enemy for yourself. I think Identitary Politics when done to the extreme will result in the complete
oblitaration of the party pursuing them if they do it long enough.
Donald Trump's "America First" policy is clearly racist, taken
It turns down that the big group, White Heterosexuals, are
a) an overwhelming majority
I think you meant to add 'male' to that description. Do you mean in the population or among legitimate registered voters?
b) the most owerful engine in the economy.
Are you saying this with respect to the working class, leadership (CEO) clas or elected class?
Richard Falken wrote to Daniel <=-
Re: Re: Tuesday Briefing
By: Daniel to Richard Falken on Mon May 04 2020 01:14 pm
It turns down that the big group, White Heterosexuals, are
a) an overwhelming majority
I think you meant to add 'male' to that description. Do you mean in the population or among legitimate registered voters?
b) the most owerful engine in the economy.
Are you saying this with respect to the working class, leadership (CEO) clas or elected class?
My understanding is that White Heterosexuals are an overwelming
political majority in the US. I don't know the specific details. Here
in Spain they are both the most registered voters and the most of the population.
As for being an engine in the economy, I mean getting things done in general, from directing firms to moving boxes in a warehouse. People laugthes a lot, but the sum of many small familiar farms ammounts to a whole lot of production.
Richard Falken wrote to Daniel <=-
Re: Re: Tuesday Briefing
By: Daniel to Richard Falken on Mon May 04 2020 01:14 pm
It turns down that the big group, White Heterosexuals, are
a) an overwhelming majority
I think you meant to add 'male' to that description. Do you mean in the population or among legitimate registered voters?
b) the most owerful engine in the economy.
Are you saying this with respect to the working class, leadership (CEO) c or elected class?
My understanding is that White Heterosexuals are an overwelming political majority in the US. I don't know the specific details. Here in Spain they are both the most registered voters and the most of the population.
I'm not versed up on Spain's demographics. The population is so incredibly diverse, in the US, that the only way to get a granular breakdown is to cond a study on the census. Sexual orientation? How would anyone know that information unless it were volunteered? Would it be a truthful declaration?
As for being an engine in the economy, I mean getting things done in general, from directing firms to moving boxes in a warehouse. People laugthes a lot, but the sum of many small familiar farms ammounts to a whole lot of production.
Yeah, the US is intensely diverse. Racially, I don't think there is a white majority. I may have time later to research it. But, it's also far more comp since many of our firms operate, at least partially, outside the country.
Daniel Traechin
... Visit me at gopher://gcpp.world
One (of the many) things lefties have against home schooling and charter schools is they cannot control the curricula in either.
But Mexico has done nothing but flood the US with their illegal aliens, drugs.
You clearly never served, did you?
Yeah I have.
I was in the Army.
| Sysop: | Coz |
|---|---|
| Location: | Anoka, MN |
| Users: | 2 |
| Nodes: | 4 (0 / 4) |
| Uptime: | 138:38:12 |
| Calls: | 166 |
| Files: | 5,389 |
| Messages: | 223,229 |