What about the Senate? There are 100 members there, who are waiting for house members to start passing some crap their way. Where's the crap?
Have you ever considered emigrating to North Korea?
They revere their leader ...
If I got my number correct, there are 535 members of Congress, with annual >salaries of about $175,000 each. So, about $93,625,000, in one year, is
about
how much of your tax dollars (if you're from the states) was spent on >attacking the president. Because, unfortunately, that's about all Congress >has done in 365 days' time.
Couldn't that money have been spent more wisely?
I guess maybe it just looks like a lot of money to me, because I'm a
low-earner. But how about all that time?
What about the Senate? There are 100 members there, who are waiting for
house members to start passing some crap their way. Where's the crap?
On 11-29-19 01:13, Aaron Thomas <=-
spoke to All about Your tax dollars at work <=-
What about the Senate? There are 100 members there, who are waiting
for house members to start passing some crap their way. Where's the
crap?
Do not believe everything you have been told -
https://www.truthorfiction.com/democrats-spent-40000000-of-your-tax
less than you might think. And likewise the cost. Especially since
no member of Congress bothers attacking the president, since he is
The Congress does not spend money. It just allocates funds.
So do *NOT* blame the House for any lack of legislation being passed.
Put the blame where it belongs -- Mitch McConnell.
aaron thomas wrote to Ward Dossche <=-
Is it not pc to support your leader?
These representatives aren't doing anything for the liberal agenda, or
for the USA.
Lee Lofaso wrote to aaron thomas <=-
What money? None was spent on "attacking the president", as that
is not a duty among any of them.
The Congress does not spend money. It just allocates funds.
On 12-01-19 00:05, Aaron Thomas <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Your tax dollars at <=-
So do *NOT* blame the House for any lack of legislation being passed.
Put the blame where it belongs -- Mitch McConnell.
What's his excuse? Are they a bunch of partisan bills? Ones to protect other countries? What kind of bills is the senate sitting on?
House Democrats have passed a wide range of bills since they came to
pro-democracy reform known as H.R.1, to bills to save net neutrality,
pass universal background checks for guns, and reenter the United States into the Paris climate accords.
On 12-03-19 11:43, Aaron Thomas <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Your tax dollars at <=-
House Democrats have passed a wide range of bills since they came to
But that's what I mean; do you want Mitch McConnell to open the Senate
up for votes on a bunch of partisan bills?
pro-democracy reform known as H.R.1, to bills to save net neutrality,
pass universal background checks for guns, and reenter the United States into the Paris climate accords.
These all sound partisan to me. Aren't they?
Maybe McConnell doesn't
think it's fair for House Republicans to be muted while opening up the Senate for a partisan takeover?
I don't know - I'm just guessing. Why else wouldn't he want the Senate
to vote on this stuff?
Why is net neutrality a partisan bill, or background checks (which Trump said he supported), or the Paris accords?
H.R. 987 Raise the Wage Act
H.R. 2480 Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act
Lee Lofaso wrote to aaron thomas <=-
What money? None was spent on "attacking the president", as that
is not a duty among any of them.
I shouldn't be, but I'm constantly surprised at how ignorant the left is RL>about economics.
House Democrats have passed a wide range of bills since they came to
But that's what I mean; do you want Mitch McConnell to open the Senate up AT>for votes on a bunch of partisan bills?
pro-democracy reform known as H.R.1, to bills to save net neutrality,
pass universal background checks for guns, and reenter the United States into the Paris climate accords.
These all sound partisan to me. Aren't they? Maybe McConnell doesn't think AT>it's fair for House Republicans to be muted while opening up the Senate AT>for a partisan takeover?
I don't know - I'm just guessing. Why else wouldn't he want the Senate to AT>vote on this stuff?
On 12-03-19 11:43, Aaron Thomas <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Your tax dollars at <=-
House Democrats have passed a wide range of bills since they came to
Which of these bills do you consider to be partisan, and why?
H.R. 986 Protecting Americans with Preexisting Conditions Act of 2019 DS>H.R. 987 Strengthening Health Care and Lowering Prescription Drug Costs DS>Act H.R. 1520, the Purple Book Continuity Act (bill aimed at lowering the DS>cost of prescription drugs)
H.R. 1503, the Orange Book Transparency Act of 2019 (bill aimed at DS>lowering the cost of prescription drugs)
H.R. 8 Bipartisan Background Checks Act of 2019
H.R. 1112 Enhanced Background Checks Act of 2019
H.R. 1331 Local Water Protection Act
S. 47 National Resources Management Act
H.R. 2578 National Flood Insurance Program Extension Act of 2019
H.R. 205, 1146, 1941 Banning Offshore Drilling on Atlantic, Pacific, DS>Eastern Gulf and ANWR Coasts
H.R. 840 Veterans' Access to Child Care Act
H.J. Res. 37 Directing the removal of United States Armed Forces from DS>hostilities in the Republic of Yemen that have not been
authorized by Congress
H.R. 1585 Violence Against Women Reauthorization Act of 2019
H.R. 987 Raise the Wage Act
H.R. 1500 Consumers First Act
H.R. 1994 SECURE Act/Gold Star Family Tax Relief Act
H.R. 2722 Securing America's Federal Elections (SAFE) Act
H.R. 4617 Stopping Harmful Interference in Elections for a Lasting DS>Democracy (SHIELD) Act
H.R. 1644 Save the Internet Act of 2019
H.R. 2157 Supplemental Appropriations Act, 2019
H.R. 397 Rehabilitation for Multiemployer Pensions Act (The Butch Lewis DS>Act) H.R. 251 Chemical Facility Anti-Terrorism Standards Program DS>Extension Act S.24 Government Employee Fair Treatment Act of 2019
H.R. 2480 Child Abuse Prevention and Treatment Act
Just a glance through the first parts of it I already find excellent reasons for it not to pass;
Requiring availability of Internet for voter registration. (That alone opens up voter registration to fraudulent non-citizen voting; a democrat staple)
On 12-04-19 23:38, Tim Richardson <=-
spoke to Aaron Thomas about Re: Your tax dollars at <=-
Most of it is all slanted toward illegal voter registration and thats
just the first several paragraphs! I'll look through it over the next
few days.
I will admit that some of those 400 bills might be considered partison
in nature, but more than half of them passed the house with bipartison >support. There is no reason that McConnell should not allow them to
get voted on -- maybe they would pass, maybe they would not -- but at
least stop tucking them into his desk drawer.
Most of it is all slanted toward illegal voter registration and thats >TR>just the first several paragraphs! I'll look through it over the next >TR>few days.
Much of what you call illegal voter registration, I would call
prevention of illegal prevention of people from voting.
Much of what you call illegal voter registration, I would call
prevention of illegal prevention of people from voting.
On 12-06-19 20:08, Lee Lofaso <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Your tax dollars at <=-
On 12-04-19 23:38, Tim Richardson <=-
spoke to Aaron Thomas about Re: Your tax dollars at <=-
I will admit that some of those 400 bills might be considered partison
in nature, but more than half of them passed the house with bipartison support. There is no reason that McConnell should not allow them to
get voted on -- maybe they would pass, maybe they would not -- but at least stop tucking them into his desk drawer.
I hate it when people prevent others from voting, but how can I trust Democrats to protect me from that when they manipulate traffic on
We're not football teams; we're citizens with different political points of view. We shouldn't be tackling each other.
I will admit that some of those 400 bills might be considered partison >DS>in nature, but more than half of them passed the house with bipartison >DS>support. There is no reason that McConnell should not allow them to >DS>get voted on -- maybe they would pass, maybe they would not -- but at >DS>least stop tucking them into his desk drawer.
Maybe more would get done for Our United States of America, if the DEMS
would
join the Republicans and the President and get things for America, instead
of
standing in his way trying to obstruct him because they often are seen >seething in hate, with stupid investigations and impeachment inquiries, and >now full articles of impeachment.
They own this now and it will be their undoing.
In which case, why have a Congress? Or a Supreme Court?
We can just have a monarchy. Or a dictatorship.
Maybe more would get done for Our United States of America, if the DEMS would join the Republicans and the President and get things for America, instead of standing in his way trying to obstruct him because they often
Living in a rural area with maybe 100 people who vote in the city elections and maybe 3-400 from county who vote in our polling place I've seen some nasty shit from both Dems and Republicans. Goes both ways unfortunately.
Democrats and independents are doing their constitutional duty. Republicans have yet to do theirs.
On 12-08-19 19:56, Gregory Deyss <=-
spoke to Lee Lofaso about Re: Your tax dollars at <=-
What is so evil about new airports and
bridges and working together on infrastructure for the American
people?
Maybe more would get done for Our United States of America, if the DE would join the Republicans and the President and get things for Ameri instead of standing in his way trying to obstruct him because they of
If the Democrats didn't work so hard to make the president look bad, they would succeed more. Democrats offer some policies that can be beneficial dfor all Americans (climate, public-assistace,) and if they would bend
on some things, the Republicans would bend on others. Or, they don't
even have to bend; they could compromise, and help each other get at
least 1/2 of what they want.
On 12-08-19 19:56, Gregory Deyss <=-
spoke to Lee Lofaso about Re: Your tax dollars at <=-
What is so evil about new airports and
bridges and working together on infrastructure for the American people?
Nothing at all. That is one of the things that Trump promised. How did that go? Either now, or when he controlled both houses of Congress?
Has he or the Republican introduced any such bills? I really don't know and would like to find out if they did and if so, what happened to them.
On 12-08-19 14:16, Aaron Thomas <=-
spoke to Gregory Deyss about Re: Your tax dollars at <=-
If the Democrats didn't work so hard to make the president look bad,
they would succeed more.
On 12-08-19 14:16, Aaron Thomas <=-
spoke to Gregory Deyss about Re: Your tax dollars at <=-
If the Democrats didn't work so hard to make the president look bad, they would succeed more.
They don't have to work to make Trump look bad, he does that all by himself.
That's like planning your wedding day, but previously visiting the
lawyer to making sure that the divorce papers are ready to go, if you should need them.
Gregory Deyss wrote to Lee Lofaso <=-
They are some piece of work, the American people can see what they have been doing and what they have become. They will be sorry, come election time. They are destroying their political futures, because getting
Trump means more to them then serving the people who put them there to
get things done of which never involved standing in the way of
progress.
Dale Shipp wrote to Aaron Thomas <=-
They don't have to work to make Trump look bad, he does that all by himself.
That's like planning your wedding day, but previously visiting the lawyer to making sure that the divorce papers are ready to go, if you should need them.
I remember the imagery: Chuck Schumer had a smug look on his face too.
But by not making any deal with the president, they both succeeded in delivering the message to voters: "We don't agree with the president on anything - so it's PC to vote for us." Robert Deniro read them loud and clear.
Gregory Deyss wrote to Lee Lofaso <=-
They are some piece of work, the American people can see what they ha been doing and what they have become. They will be sorry, come electi time. They are destroying their political futures, because getting Trump means more to them then serving the people who put them there t get things done of which never involved standing in the way of progress.
The Dems are already sorry.
Trump was polling behind Biden, but after the Impeachment Show, Trump is polling above all the Dems in all the swing states now.
And keep in mind that the polls are usually left-slanted, so if Trump is polling "above" that means he is polling so high that no matter how much the Left slants things, Trump comes out ahead.
Now if we can only get an investigation into the Biden quid pro quo when he was in office.
If the Democrats didn't work so hard to make the president look bad, they would succeed more.
They don't have to work to make Trump look bad, he does that all by himself.
that Donald Trump is the best President since Lincoln.
On 12-10-19 07:28, Gregory Deyss <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Your tax dollars at <=-
Look at the map "county by county" across this Great Land that is the United States of America of the results of how it's people voted in the 2016 election.
There is more red on that map then Verizon. Can you hear me now? Good!
The real problem here is you're not giving credit where credit is due. Unemployment down to a 50 year low, Stock Market $mashing records over
and over. I could go on and on but you wouldn't be interested in any
of that. What a dismal existence it must be to be a democrat not to see that Donald Trump is the best President since Lincoln.
that Donald Trump is the best President since Lincoln.
Don't expect Democrats to think highly of a guy who opposed slavery.
--- Mystic BBS v1.12 A43 2019/03/03 (Raspberry Pi/32)
* Origin: Alcoholiday / Est. 1995 / alco.bbs.io (1:123/525)
On 12-10-19 07:28, Gregory Deyss <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Your tax dollars at <=-
Look at the map "county by county" across this Great Land that is the United States of America of the results of how it's people voted in t 2016 election.
There is more red on that map then Verizon. Can you hear me now? Good
Many of those counties have orders of magnitude fewer people than are in many American cities. We do not vote by counties.
The real problem here is you're not giving credit where credit is due Unemployment down to a 50 year low, Stock Market $mashing records ove and over. I could go on and on but you wouldn't be interested in any of that. What a dismal existence it must be to be a democrat not to s that Donald Trump is the best President since Lincoln.
Please tell us all what it is that Trump has done to lower the unemployment rate?
Ditto about the stock market (and how much that matters to most of America)?
Please tell us all what it is that Trump has done to lower the unemployment rate?
Ditto about the stock market (and how much that matters to most of America)?
Dale Shipp
fido_261_1466 (at) verizon (dot) net
(1:261/1466)
... Shipwrecked on Hesperus in Columbia, Maryland. 01:59:16, 11 Dec 2019 ___ Blue Wave/DOS v2.30
--- Maximus/NT 3.01
* Origin: Owl's Anchor (1:261/1466)
On 12-10-19 23:21, Aaron Thomas <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Your tax dollars at <=-
If the Democrats didn't work so hard to make the president look bad, they would succeed more.
They don't have to work to make Trump look bad, he does that all by himself.
Through the eyes of who?
When Republicans have issues with Trump, they toss them right in his
face.
But I don't see any Republicans pushing the impeachment over
these frivolous things that are being blown out of proportion "Trump's
a threat to the constitution."
Who's the group that's asking for
medicare for the entire world?
The group that wants to disarm America?
The group that's pushing for prison reform?
That would be the group
that's a threat to the constitution.
On 12-11-19 19:50, Gregory Deyss <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Your tax dollars at <=-
Please tell us all what it is that Trump has done to lower the unemployment rate?
As promised here ya go.
"African American unemployment is the lowest ever recorded in our
country. The Hispanic unemployment rate dropped a full point in the
last year and is close to the lowest in recorded history. Dems did
nothing for you but get your vote!"
The strength of the labor market in 2018 also was widespread,
affecting people of all backgrounds and education levels throughout the nation. Over the course of the year, multiple new records for low unemployment rates within demographic groups were set. In December
2018, the unemployment rate for Hispanics fell to a series low (4.4 percent), matching October 2018. Record low unemployment rates were
also achieved this year for African Americans (5.9 percent in May), Asians (2.2 percent in May), and individuals with less than a high
school degree (5.0 percent in July). In November 2018, the unemployment rate for teens (ages 16 to 19) was at its lowest rate since 1969.
The November 2018 unemployment rate for individuals with a high school degree but no college fell to its lowest rate since 2000, while the October 2018 unemployment rate for individuals with some college
education dropped to its lowest rate since 2001.
Stock Market under Trump Everyone is impressed with the performance of
the stock market under President Trump's especially Trump. Stocks have risen in nine of the first ten months of the Trump Administration, a record that no other U.S. president can match. That goes back to
President William McKinley in 1897; before 1896 there were no stock indices.
Stock market's value under Trump has grown by $6.9 trillion to $30.6 trillion. The stock market has added $6.9 trillion in market cap since Donald Trump was elected president. That is already nearly half of what the market grew by in all eight years of the Obama administration.
The continued low unemployment rate and the consistent employment
gains of more than 100,000 jobs every month in 2018 demonstrate the effectiveness of the
Administration's economic policies. As workers continue to come off
the sidelines, there also remain opportunities for sustained employment growth as we enter the new year.
"African American unemployment is the lowest ever recorded in our country. The Hispanic unemployment rate dropped a full point in the last year and is close to the lowest in recorded history. Dems did nothing for you but get your vote!"
It happened, but what are the policies or laws enacted by Trump that caused that to happen.
They don't have to work to make Trump look bad, he does that all by >DS>himself.
Look at the map "county by county" across this Great Land that is the United >States of America of the results of how it's people voted in the 2016 >election.
There is more red on that map then Verizon. Can you hear me now? Good!
The real problem here is you're not giving credit where credit is due. >Unemployment down to a 50 year low, Stock Market $mashing records over and >over. I could go on and on but you wouldn't be interested in any of that.
What a dismal existence it must be to be a democrat not to see that Donald >Trump is the best President since Lincoln.
Now if we can only get an investigation into the Biden quid pro quo when he
was in office.
that Donald Trump is the best President since Lincoln.
Don't expect Democrats to think highly of a guy who opposed slavery.
If the Democrats didn't work so hard to make the president look bad, >AT>they would succeed more.
They don't have to work to make Trump look bad, he does that all by
himself.
DS> AT> If the Democrats didn't work so hard to make the president look bad,
DS> AT> they would succeed more.
DS>
DS> They don't have to work to make Trump look bad, he does that all by
DS> himself.
Look at the map "county by county" across this Great Land that is the
United
States of America of the results of how it's people voted in the 2016 election.
There is more red on that map then Verizon. Can you hear me now? Good!
The real problem here is you're not giving credit where credit is due.
Unemployment down to a 50 year low, Stock Market $mashing records over and >over. I could go on and on but you wouldn't be interested in any of that. >What a dismal existence it must be to be a democrat not to see that Donald >Trump is the best President since Lincoln.
Democrats and independents are doing their constitutional duty. >LL>Republicans have yet to do theirs.
Were Republicans doing a smart thing with the Clinton impeachment?
Because he lied under oath?
What was that supposed to accomplish?
Maybe cost him his 2nd term?
What did anyone learn about that?
That it doesn't work?
When Republicans have issues with Trump, they toss them right in his face.
When has that happened?
but frivolous. They harmed an ally and aided an adversary.
Some of the Democrat candidates, but not all, are pushing for an
immediate medicare for all *IN AMERICA*, but none are asking for it for the entire world. Where did you get that idea?
None of the things you mentioned are any threat to the Constitution.
OTOH, a President who openly admits to breaking Federal law comes as
close as one can get.
Don't expect Democrats to think highly of a guy who opposed slavery.
Democrats loved President Davis ...
What it was all about was sex. Republicans were jealous, and
they wanted in on the action. Ken Starr even put Monica Lewinski's
On 12-12-19 07:38, Gregory Deyss <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Your tax dollars at <=-
It happened, but what are the policies or laws enacted by Trump that caused that to happen.
To find out what caused or allowed these positives to happen, all one needs to do is listen to the President on his very first day.
On 12-12-19 13:27, Aaron Thomas <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Your tax dollars at <=-
but frivolous. They harmed an ally and aided an adversary.
You mean could have and could have, but didn't?
None of the things you mentioned are any threat to the Constitution.
OTOH, a President who openly admits to breaking Federal law comes as
close as one can get.
Close, but no cigar.
On 12-12-19 13:27, Aaron Thomas <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Your tax dollars at <=-
When Republicans have issues with Trump, they toss them right in his
face.
When has that happened?
John Mccain, Jeff Flake, Martha McSally, these are just a few of your obstructionist pals in the GOP. But I suppose I'll have to admit that
Republicans are usually inline with each other, and they don't have
nearly as much internal conflict (currently) as the Dems; this is one reason why there are 1 or 2 Republicans running against Trump in 2020,
and 20 Democrats. Many of the dem candidates are already trash-talking each other, thereby confusing their constituents about who they should vote for in the primary.
Adolf Hitler took office through legal means. His party did not
win a majority of the votes. And yet he managed to gain supreme power, with his party firmly in control.
Many Germans consider Adolf Hitler as being not only one of the
smartest persons who ever lived, but also revere him as their savior.
Here is how one blogger describes his hero, Adolf Hitler -
"Adolf Hitler was just a simple man with righteous goals. He wanted to
fix the German economy and damn it he did that. He wanted to expand Germany to its former glory by reclaiming its stolen land and more and Hitler was on the right track. He wanted to created a perfect society where Aryans can peacefully live in by eradicating threats like Gypsies, homosexuals, Jews, etc. This act of eradication can be easily compared
to acts by God. God himself wanted to create an ideal world by killing
all the other sinners with the flood, sparing noble Noah and his family. What goes to say Hitler was in the wrong when he was merely following
in God's footsteps? Hitler was not only the smartest man in the world,
his power is similar to that of any Holy Deity. His speeches brought
pride back into the once broken and poor Germany."
https://www.thetoptens.com/smartest-people-history/
How will future Americans view Donald Trump? Will they revere him
as a god, as Germans do with Adolf Hitler?
What if Trump decides to declare a national emergency once the Senate acquits him of all charges, then locks up every card-carrying Democrat
in the land, charging each and every one of them as being an "enemy of
the state"?
Bernie Sanders would win the Democratic nomination, being that he
is a self-declared socialist rather than a Democrat, thus escaping
the wrath of Trump.
Do you mean statements like "We're going to build a wall and Mexico is going to pay for it"? Or how he stopped companies from migrating their operations to Mexico -- but not a peep from him when they did just that after he was elected?
From before he even began to run for President, he was involved in many failed ventures
True, the stock market is up since he took office, but by a lessor percentage (40%) than it increased under Obama after the great recession (120%).
You mentioned the removal of regulations as if that is a good thing. Personally, I do not see how allowing more oil spills on our coast is a good thing. I cannot see how destroying our natural resources is a good thing. I cannot see how allowing increased pollution from burning more coal is a good thing. Nor how not encouraging and supporting alternate sources of energy (e.g. windmills) is a good thing. All of these are a result of Trump's policy programs or lack there of.
But all of that pales before his abuses of power and corruption, especially having to do with interference in the American elections by foreign governments.
Good thing Trump prefers twitter rather than live performance
at the theater. Hiding behind a keyboard is much safer than hiding
behind a curtain ...
On 12-13-19 19:21, Gregory Deyss <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Your tax dollars at <=-
No I mean words such as these, like I said from his very first day.
Every four years, we gather on these steps to carry out the orderly
and peaceful transfer of power, and we are grateful to President Obama
and First Lady Michelle Obama for their gracious aid throughout this transition. They have been magnificent. Thank you.
Americans want great schools for their children,
while America's
infrastructure has fallen into disrepair and decay.
Every decision on trade, on taxes, on immigration, on foreign affairs
will be made to benefit American workers and American families. We must
We will follow two simple rules: buy American, and hire American. We
From before he even began to run for President, he was involved in many failed ventures
Many successful people fail before they are a complete success.
True, the stock market is up since he took office, but by a lessor percentage (40%) than it increased under Obama after the great recession (120%).
Are you forgetting that under Obama the United States fell in it's
credit rating.
You mentioned the removal of regulations as if that is a good thing. Personally, I do not see how allowing more oil spills on our coast is a good thing. I cannot see how destroying our natural resources is a good thing. I cannot see how allowing increased pollution from burning more coal is a good thing. Nor how not encouraging and supporting alternate sources of energy (e.g. windmills) is a good thing. All of these are a result of Trump's policy programs or lack there of.
You really don't have any clue what regulations were cut, but that
On 12-13-19 19:21, Gregory Deyss <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Your tax dollars at <=-
But all of that pales before his abuses of power and corruption, especially having to do with interference in the American elections by foreign governments.
Are you sure you want to engage with me about the last paragraph, I
will leave you with this (so you can think about it, first)
Everything that the Dems have said that Trump did, collusion with a foreign government, bribery, corruption - all of it, they are GUILTY
of. because this is a matter of FACT, Trump will win in a LANDSLIDE.
Here is a blast from the past; PUSU
https://theruggedindividualist.wordpress.com/2017/11/06/demo rats-guilty-of-eve
rything-for-which-they-accused-trump/
https://www.gop.com/everything-democrats-accuse-trump-of- doing-they-are-guilty-
There are many many more such examples.
Better Think about it.
If committing a felony, which Trump has done since in office, and
allowing that to go unchecked is not a threat to the Constitution then pray tell what is in your opinion?
of great principle. And yes, Flake did criticise Trump, but after he
The number is slowing decreasing. They have their differences, and wish for the voters to decide. It is not unlike the previous Repulican race
So, what does he do but appoint a Secrtary of Education who has been
on record as being for private schools instead of supporting public education.
I will agree that was a very good speech.
So, what does he do but appoint a Secrtary of Education who has been
on record as being for private schools instead of supporting public education.
while America's
infrastructure has fallen into disrepair and decay.
And his grand plan for infrastructure has never even gotten started.
Tell that to the farmers who have lost much because of his implusive
trade tariffs. Or the American public who has to pay what amounts to a tax for his tariffs on imported goods.
We will follow two simple rules: buy American, and hire American. We
But Trump bought his MAGA hats from China?
Not that much. Trump has a track record of bankruptcy along with
shafting his employees and contractors.
Are you forgetting that under Obama the United States fell in it's credit rating.
Nope -- and that was because of national debt. Trump is increasing the debt with his tax cuts and other things to the point where the credit rating may again be lowered.
I have as good a clue as anyone who follows the news, including pronouncements by Trump -- e.g. downplaying windmills because they don't work when the wind does not blow, and because they kill birds, etc. Or the proposals to allow oil exploration in pristine Alaska protected
areas.
Don't expect Democrats to think highly of a guy who opposed slavery.
Democrats loved President Davis ...
.and many are still loyal to him
What it was all about was sex. Republicans were jealous, and
they wanted in on the action. Ken Starr even put Monica Lewinski's
Republicans were wrong to impeach Clinton. I think all the stress of the >impeachment caused Clinton to falter, and make all kinds of terrible
mistakes
for the US economy. He would've been popular and successful if he didn't >trash our economy, if it weren't for those meddling Republicans.
Good thing Trump prefers twitter rather than live performance
at the theater. Hiding behind a keyboard is much safer than hiding >LL>behind a curtain ...
Yeah I know about the keyboard warriors, there are several of those kind of
people here in FIDONET; slamming keys in their underwear, while sitting in the basements of their parents home. I'm so terrified. NOT!
aaron thomas wrote to Dale Shipp <=-
When Republicans have issues with Trump, they toss them right in his
face. But I don't see any Republicans pushing the impeachment over
these frivolous things that are being blown out of proportion "Trump's
a threat to the constitution." Who's the group that's asking for
medicare for the entire world? The group that wants to disarm America?
The group that's pushing for prison reform? That would be the group
that's a threat to the constitution.
Dale Shipp wrote to Aaron Thomas <=-
Through the eyes of anyone with an independent and unbiased mind.
Trump has denied the role of Congress to be an independent body by refusing to allow anyone in the Whitehouse staff to submit to a Supena from Congress. What is he so afraid of? His actions have been
anything but frivolous. They harmed an ally and aided an adversary.
Some of the Democrat candidates, but not all, are pushing for an
immediate medicare for all *IN AMERICA*, but none are asking for it for the entire world. Where did you get that idea?
No one wants to do that, despite what you might think in some
conspiracy theory.
Lee Lofaso wrote to Gregory Deyss <=-
And the result shows Hillary Clinton winning the popular vote
by almost 3 million more votes than the next contestant ...
Gregory Deyss wrote to Lee Lofaso <=-
Socialism would not work here in the United States ever!
We know through history where that road leads; your thinking is the problem, with your desire or maybe it's because you do not have faith within Donald Trump and your eyes not to mention your mind is closed
off to everything that he has done while President that has been really positive for our country.
Dale Shipp wrote to Gregory Deyss <=-
Americans want great schools for their children,
So, what does he do but appoint a Secrtary of Education who has been
on record as being for private schools instead of supporting public education.
On 12-14-19 11:07, Gregory Deyss <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Your tax dollars at <=-
He has kept more promises than any other President in U.S. History.
So, what does he do but appoint a Secretary of Education who has been
on record as being for private schools instead of supporting public education.
Has she done so during her post as Secretary of Education?
All you can say is what she allegedly done on a former post.
while America's
infrastructure has fallen into disrepair and decay.
And his grand plan for infrastructure has never even gotten started.
He is not a dictator - where as he can't do the infrastructure on his
own, he needs Nancy and Chuck to stop conspiring behind his back and
work with the President to get this infrastructure completed.
Tell that to the farmers who have lost much because of his impulsive
trade tariffs. Or the American public who has to pay what amounts to a tax for his tariffs on imported goods.
You really need to stop watching the likes of CNN and MSNBC, the money that has been coming from the tariffs has been provided to the farmers.
But Trump bought his MAGA hats from China?
There are knock-off everywhere, the one that I have is made in the
USA. Why the knock-offs, these people are riding the coat tails of
Trump for their own fiscal gain.
I have as good a clue as anyone who follows the news, including pronouncements by Trump -- e.g. downplaying windmills because they don't work when the wind does not blow, and because they kill birds, etc. Or the proposals to allow oil exploration in pristine Alaska protected
areas.
Would you rather return on being dependent on a foreign land for oil
and natural gas. I am sure you are old enough to remember the gas
crisis of the 70's is that want you want to return to?
So if they are accusing someone of being a threat to the Constitution, then they are the threat. Which is pretty easy to see since I have yet
to see a Democrat obey the Constitution.
Do I detect a pattern there? Or is it just another case of hypocrisy, sort of like coming down hard on undocumented immigrants, all the while hiring them to help his personal businesses?
On 12-04-19 23:38, Tim Richardson <=-
spoke to Aaron Thomas about Re: Your tax dollars at <=-
I will admit that some of those 400 bills might be consi
Much of what you call illegal voter registration, I would call
prevention of illegal prevention of people from voting.
I hate it when people prevent others from voting, but how can I trust AT>Democrats to protect me from that when they manipulate traffic on election AT>day?
On 12-08-19 19:56, Gregory Deyss <=-
spoke to Lee Lofaso about Re: Your tax dollars at <=-
What is so evil about new airports and
bridges and working together on infrastructure for the American
people?
Nothing at all. That is one of the things that Trump promised. How did DS>that go? Either now, or when he controlled both houses of Congress?
Has he or the Republican introduced any such bills? I really don't know DS>and would like to find out if they did and if so, what happened to them.
On 12-08-19 14:16, Aaron Thomas <=-
spoke to Gregory Deyss about Re: Your tax dollars at <=-
If the Democrats didn't work so hard to make the president look bad,
they would succeed more.
They don't have to work to make Trump look bad, he does that all by DS>himself.
Thank God we found a savior in Barack Obama, who rescued us from hell.
What we need today is to find another savior who can rescue us from another hell. But there is hope. The audacity of hope. That another will arise. Such as Michelle Obama ...
Dale Shipp wrote to Aaron Thomas <=-
Through the eyes of anyone with an independent and unbiased mind.
If you think you are unbiased, then you are deluded. Everyone has
biases. Until you recognize that, you cannot even try to be unbiased.
Trump has denied the role of Congress to be an independent body by refusing to allow anyone in the Whitehouse staff to submit to a Supen from Congress. What is he so afraid of? His actions have been anything but frivolous. They harmed an ally and aided an adversary.
Let's see... The Dems want universal healthcare for everyone in the
U.S. Then they want to give those same benefits to illegal aliens.
Then they want to open the border to anyone who wants to come in.
Seriously?On 12-14-19 11:07, Gregory Deyss <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Your tax dollars at <=-
He has kept more promises than any other President in U.S. History.
Name a few?
And his grand plan for infrastructure has never even gotten started.
He is not a dictator - where as he can't do the infrastructure on his own, he needs Nancy and Chuck to stop conspiring behind his back and work with the President to get this infrastructure completed.
He had two years with the Republicans in full control of both houses -- what did he do then? You cannot sidestep the blame to Nancy and Chuck
for that failure to do anything to fulfill his promises.
Tell that to the farmers who have lost much because of his impulsive trade tariffs. Or the American public who has to pay what amounts to tax for his tariffs on imported goods.
You really need to stop watching the likes of CNN and MSNBC, the mone that has been coming from the tariffs has been provided to the farmer
Where do you get that? After the farmers lost much, they finally
approved 12billion aid -- but that did not come from tariffs, it came
from the public coffers at the expense of you and me. The government
does not get the money from tariffs, the consumer pays them.
But Trump bought his MAGA hats from China?
There are knock-off everywhere, the one that I have is made in the USA. Why the knock-offs, these people are riding the coat tails of Trump for their own fiscal gain.
Do I detect a pattern there? Or is it just another case of hypocrisy, sort of like coming down hard on undocumented immigrants, all the while hiring them to help his personal businesses?
Would you rather return on being dependent on a foreign land for oil and natural gas. I am sure you are old enough to remember the gas crisis of the 70's is that want you want to return to?
Yes I do recall that, but don't use that as an excuse to destroy the natural environment when there other plausible alternatives that can and should be considered.
Dale Shipp wrote to Gregory Deyss <=-
NO -- it is what she is doing in her current post. Advocating vouchers
to subsidize private schools instead of helping public schools to
improve.
Where do you get that? After the farmers lost much, they finally
approved 12billion aid -- but that did not come from tariffs, it came
from the public coffers at the expense of you and me. The government
does not get the money from tariffs, the consumer pays them.
Gregory Deyss wrote to Lee Lofaso <=-
Michelle (Michael) will not run this time out.
Trump would destroy her, him I mean.
They do so for a good reason; it is democrats who benefit from illegal voting.
Michelle (Michael) will not run this time out.
Trump would destroy her, him I mean.
Some kind of thing is happening here in New York with the Green light
law. Where the State of New York says that the county clerks can not
And the result shows Hillary Clinton winning the popular vote
by almost 3 million more votes than the next contestant ...
Which is completely irrelevant since we don't elect the President by popular
vote (it's in the Constitution).
Which is, of course, why the Dems want to eliminate the Electoral College.
But to do that they need to amend the Constitution, which they aren't doing.
Instead they are trying to subvert the Constitution.
What group is a threat to the Constitution?
Thank God we found a savior in Barack Obama, who rescued us LL>from hell.
You think Obama going around the world and apologizing for America is a good
thing for America?
What we need today is to find another savior who can rescue us from >LL>another hell. But there is hope. The audacity of hope. That another >LL>will arise. Such as Michelle Obama ...
Michelle (Michael) will not run this time out.
Trump would destroy her, him I mean.
On 12-15-19 21:00, Aaron Thomas <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Your tax dollars at <=-
Do I detect a pattern there? Or is it just another case of hypocrisy, sort of like coming down hard on undocumented immigrants, all the while hiring them to help his personal businesses?
Hiring illegal immigrants is somewhat legal. When there are legal loopholes for things, people take advantage of them, even the
president.
But do you actually thing that Trump interviewed and trained these illegals that "he hired?" Did he do their background checks? The
dude has people working
for him.
Oh? I had no idea that you were in New York. How did you get a node in Net 123. Net 267 covers all of New York. If you are happy where you are withinSome kind of thing is happening here in New York with the Green light law. Where the State of New York says that the county clerks can not
I'm in NY too, and am aware of this.
people have already shown us how much they give a crap about our laws;
What are the legal loopholes? If you hire someone as a worker, you are
Net 123. Net 267 covers all of New York. If you are happy where you are
What can we do to stop our laws from being ignored?
Lee Lofaso wrote to Ron Lauzon <=-
There is nothing in the US Constitution mandating the use of the
electoral college process in order to elect the President.
Direct democracy is what every prodemocratic individual on the
face of this planet should fully support. One person, one vote.
It really is that simple.
They do so for a good reason; it is democrats who benefit from illegal voting.
I see that as one of many voting problems. Does Congress have a bill to AT>fix that? It sounds like that could be (mostly) corrected by tying death AT>certificates to voter status.
I think they should ask for a valid, government issued photo id, and let AT>people vote with their document number online. In these days of doing AT>stuff smarter, what's wrong with that?
On 12-14-19 11:07, Gregory Deyss <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Your tax dollars at <=-
He has kept more promises than any other President in U.S. History.
Name a few?
So, what does he do but appoint a Secretary of Education who has been
on record as being for private schools instead of supporting public education.
There is nothing in the US Constitution mandating the use of the >LL>electoral college process in order to elect the President.
Article 2, Section 1.
And
12th Amendment
Direct democracy is what every prodemocratic individual on the
face of this planet should fully support. One person, one vote.
It really is that simple.
Yes, that *sounds* good.
But that means that the high population areas get to elect the president and
if you don't live in one of those areas, your vote
effectively does not count.
Doesn't sound very democratic to me.
And part of the reason for the Electoral system is to prevent tyranny of the
majority.
On 12-21-19 12:49, Tim Richardson <=-
spoke to Gregory Deyss about Re: Your tax dollars at <=-
3. He walked away from the Iran deal; remember the one with the
BILLIONS of American dollars on pallets Hussein Obama `gifted' to the Iranians?
5. He's made allies in Europe start paying a fairer share of the cost
of America's participation in their military security (which the
scum-suckin' lowball democrats are trying to impeach him for).
So, what does he do but appoint a Secretary of Education who has been
on record as being for private schools instead of supporting public education.
I don't know if you've been paying attention but the `public'
education level of excellence in the US sort of ......well.....SUCKS!!!
When people opt for sending their children to private schools, they
also send their `money' along with them. `
On 12-21-19 12:49, Tim Richardson <=-
spoke to Gregory Deyss about Re: Your tax dollars at <=-
3. He walked away from the Iran deal; remember the one with the
BILLIONS of American dollars on pallets Hussein Obama `gifted' to the Iranians?
Why is it a good thing to allow Iran to start building nuclear weapons? DS>And that was not American dollars. It was Iranian dollars being
returned to them. But you knew all of that.
On 12-27-19 09:12, Tim Richardson <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Your tax dollars at <=-
Why is it a good thing to allow Iran to start building nuclear weapons?
And that was not American dollars. It was Iranian dollars being
returned to them. But you knew all of that.
Are you forgetting the US embassy hostage thing? And the terrorism the islamic pig eaters have fomented since?
Not to mention the money held
in OUR possession was (or `would' have been) a pretty good incentive
for them to quit trying to come up with a nuclear weapon.
But Hussein gave away an incentive we held them to by giving up any advantage we had over them.
Now the ragheads are doing naval maneuvers with the Ruski's and the
red Chinese; both of whom are now in the middle east area with some of their most powerful naval vessels; not to mention Iran's navy (all
three speed boats).
There is no words to describe how badly democrats suck! When they
aren't ginning up false charges they're bending over backwards to
destroy the country!
On 12-27-19 09:12, Tim Richardson <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Your tax dollars at <=-
Why is it a good thing to allow Iran to start building nuclear weapons
And that was not American dollars. It was Iranian dollars being
returned to them. But you knew all of that.
Are you forgetting the US embassy hostage thing? And the terrorism th islamic pig eaters have fomented since?
I never forget things like that. But it has nothing to do with the current discussion.
Not to mention the money held
in OUR possession was (or `would' have been) a pretty good incentive for them to quit trying to come up with a nuclear weapon.
DUH -- and we gave their money back to them as part of their agreeing to stop developing nuclear weapons. And it *WAS* a pretty good incentive, and one which Trump broke.
You are in complete denial and reversal in your statement above. The charges are not false, and it is Trump who is destroying the country.
DUH -- and we gave their money back to them as part of their agreeing to stop developing nuclear weapons. And it *WAS* a pretty good incentive,
DS> DUH -- and we gave their money back to them as part of their agreeing to
DS> stop developing nuclear weapons. And it *WAS* a pretty good
incentive,
Maybe you're right about this - and maybe the rest of the world including
me
is very uninformed about this subject - but what are you talking about?
I can't find any news article that explains how the USA possessed 1.7
billion
dollars of Iranian money. How did Iran let that happen? The country that
they
wish death to was holding 1.7 billion dollars of their money? And like superheroes, Obama & Kerry gave that money back to its rightful owner?
The way I remember the scandal was that we were paying Iran, with our own
1.7
billion dollars, to denuclearize. Does the National Enquirer say something different? How do we pay Iran, with their own money, to denuclearize?
On 12-28-19 11:36, Aaron Thomas <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Your tax dollars at <=-
DUH -- and we gave their money back to them as part of their agreeing to stop developing nuclear weapons. And it *WAS* a pretty good incentive,
Maybe you're right about this - and maybe the rest of the world
including me is very uninformed about this subject - but what are you talking about?
I can't find any news article that explains how the USA possessed 1.7 billion dollars of Iranian money. How did Iran let that happen? The country that they wish death to was holding 1.7 billion dollars of
their money? And like superheroes, Obama & Kerry gave that money back
to its rightful owner?
The way I remember the scandal was that we were paying Iran, with our
own 1.7 billion dollars, to denuclearize. Does the National Enquirer
say something different? How do we pay Iran, with their own money, to denuclearize?
Back in late 1979, after Iranian revolutionaries took 52 Americans
Dale Shipp wrote to Tim Richardson <=-
You are in complete denial and reversal in your statement above. The charges are not false, and it is Trump who is destroying the country.
How is Trump destroying the country?
Care to provide some verifiable examples?
On 12-29-19 09:23, Aaron Thomas <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Your tax dollars at <=-
Thanks, sorry, I see all about this now. I got the story mixed up a
few years back when this was going on. But now, what does Trump's cancellation of the deal mean? Did we pay them what they were owed? Or
do we still owe them more?
Hello Greg,
How is Trump destroying the country?
We can start by violating his oath of office.
Care to provide some verifiable examples?
Take off your blinders.
How is Trump destroying the country?
We can start by violating his oath of office.
Care to provide some verifiable examples?
Take off your blinders.
No examples, that's about what what I expected.
All this talk about how bad the President is, but when you ask for examples
basically asking them to PUSU they got nothing.
I am still waiting btw.
Hello Greg,
No examples, that's about what what I expected.
He violated his oath of office. What more need be said?
No examples, that's about what what I expected.
He violated his oath of office. What more need be said?
Has the high court made this determination.
Nope they have not.
Instead of quoting democratic talking points, such as the following all
which have failed.
Here are just a few of the baseless accusations.
Bribery - That did not stick.
Quid Pro Quo - That did not stick.
Russian Dossier - That did not stick.
Mueller Report - That did not stick.
Dem Hoax destroyed.
Still waiting for concrete examples of crimes committed as President.
Hello Greg,
Not a single Republican in the House voted in favor of either
of the two articles of impeachment, having chosen to put party
above country. The rule of law means nothing to them, the
same as their dearly beloved. How sad.
Not a single Republican in the House voted in favor of either
of the two articles of impeachment, having chosen to put party
above country. The rule of law means nothing to them, the
same as their dearly beloved. How sad.
What is sad is you don't understand that
NO LAWS WERE BROKEN.
NO CRIMES WERE COMMITTED.
This why the Republicans voted the way they did.
On 01-01-20 08:55, Gregory Deyss <=-
spoke to Lee Lofaso about Re: Your tax dollars at <=-
On 01 Jan 2020, Lee Lofaso said the following...
Hello Greg,
Not a single Republican in the House voted in favor of either
of the two articles of impeachment, having chosen to put party
above country. The rule of law means nothing to them, the
same as their dearly beloved. How sad.
What is sad is you don't understand that
NO LAWS WERE BROKEN.
NO CRIMES WERE COMMITTED.
This why the Republicans voted the way they did.
Since the oath of office means nothing to Donald J. Trump,
or to any Republicans now in office, what we have in the USA
today is far worse than what Italy had under Benito Mussolini
or what Germany had under Adolf Hitler.
You see, Donald J. Trump is no fascist. Not at all.
He is a psychopath. Although a very smart one. Which
makes him all the more dangerous.
It was against the law for Trump to withhold the aid as extortion to obtain a political favor.
Not a single Republican in the House voted in favor of either
of the two articles of impeachment, having chosen to put party
above country. The rule of law means nothing to them, the
same as their dearly beloved. How sad.
What is sad is you don't understand that
NO LAWS WERE BROKEN.
NO CRIMES WERE COMMITTED.
This why the Republicans voted the way they did.
How sad it is that you don't understand the law any better.
Laws were broken.
It was against the law to withhold the military aid to Ukraine for any >reason.
It was against the law for Trump to withhold the aid as extortion to
obtain a political favor.
It was against the law for Trump to even ask a foreign government for
aid to his political campaign.
It was against the law for Trump to deny any current or previous
whitehouse aid to testify in response to a lawful subpoena from
Congress.
Those were all against the law and crimes that Trump committed.
Hello Greg,
Donald J. Trump violated his oath of office, as cited by
two articles of impeachment passed by the House.
You see, Donald J. Trump is no fascist. Not at all.
He is very smart.
On 01-01-20 08:55, Gregory Deyss <=-
spoke to Lee Lofaso about Re: Your tax dollars at <=-
On 01 Jan 2020, Lee Lofaso said the following...
Hello Greg,
Not a single Republican in the House voted in favor of either
of the two articles of impeachment, having chosen to put party
above country. The rule of law means nothing to them, the
same as their dearly beloved. How sad.
What is sad is you don't understand that
NO LAWS WERE BROKEN.
NO CRIMES WERE COMMITTED.
This why the Republicans voted the way they did.
How sad it is that you don't understand the law any better.
Laws were broken.
No Laws were broken. to spite the democrats have said on the matter. Not a one.Laws were broken.
As outlined in both articles of impeachment, but not limited to.
It was against the law to withhold the military aid to Ukraine for any >reason.
On 01-02-20 19:05, Gregory Deyss <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Your tax dollars at <=-
How sad it is that you don't understand the law any better.
Laws were broken.
Read the transcript.
No laws were broken.
None!
Since the oath of office means nothing to Donald J. Trump,
or to any Republicans now in office, what we have in the USA
today is far worse than what Italy had under Benito Mussolini
or what Germany had under Adolf Hitler.
You see, Donald J. Trump is no fascist. Not at all.
He is a psychopath. Although a very smart one. Which
makes him all the more dangerous.
Lee, you're no stranger to writing useful information. So why so bland? How >many jews has Trump slaughtered by his attempted collusion with Ukraine?
What
makes him a smart psychopath? What's dangerous about him?
I suppose he's a little dangerous because he's not apologetic to actual
psychopaths?
The art of embellishing words might be fun and fascinating, but it's not
going to prevail when it comes down to right vs wrong.
Donald J. Trump violated his oath of office, as cited by
two articles of impeachment passed by the House.
The House is a farse as reasons I previously explained.
You see, Donald J. Trump is no fascist. Not at all.
He is very smart.
I agree
take a look at the economy.
take a look at the bigger paychecks.
take a look at unemployment.
take a look at the stock market.
or would rather have socialism, if so then move to a banana republic.
Laws were broken.
No Laws were broken. to spite the democrats have said on the matter. Not a
one.
As outlined in both articles of impeachment, but not limited to.
So I say IF and that is one BIG "IF" LAWS WERE BROKEN, then why is Pelosi
dragging her feet sending this to the Senate for a vote.
Simple because she knows that NO LAWS were broken and they will move to >dismiss, and that is just for starters, what comes next is hell unleashed >upon the democrats with the calling them to testify.
Nearly everyone in America knows the story of how these dots are all >connected. Phony information given to the Fisa court. Carter Page working
for the CIA. An email was sent to the FBI informing them that he was NOT a spy
working for the Russians, but was working for the CIA. This email was
literally changed by the FBI to appear as if he was a spy working for the oRussians. All f this was done to undermine the Trump and a set up to put tthings in motion o support a narrative to have Donald Trump remove. But
it backfired!
and now all of us who don't have out heads stuffed up someones ass
understand this, because this is the Truth.
The real Truth is that these people were all but-hurt because Trump won; to
spite the many efforts to stop him.
The Fake Dossier couldn't do it. - that Hillary Clinton paid for btw.
The Mueller Report couldn't do it.
The Impeachment - which has not been delivered couldn't do it.
(even if @ sometime it will be delivered, history will record the following)
The Impeachment brought forth by the Democrats couldn't do it.
reason.It was against the law to withhold the military aid to Ukraine for any
Read the Transcript!
Grabbing women by their pussies is something only a true psychopath
would do.
Gregory Deyss wrote to Lee Lofaso <=-
or would rather have socialism, if so then move to a banana republic.
On 12-27-19 09:12, Tim Richardson <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Your tax dollars at <=-
Why is it a good thing to allow Iran to start building nuclear weapons? DS>And that was not American dollars. It was Iranian dollars being
returned to them. But you knew all of that.
Are you forgetting the US embassy hostage thing? And the terrorism the islamic pig eaters have fomented since?
I never forget things like that. But it has nothing to do with the DS>current discussion.
Not to mention the money held
in OUR possession was (or `would' have been) a pretty good incentive
for them to quit trying to come up with a nuclear weapon.
DUH -- and we gave their money back to them as part of their agreeing to DS>stop developing nuclear weapons. And it *WAS* a pretty good incentive, DS>and one which Trump broke.
But Hussein gave away an incentive we held them to by giving up any advantage we had over them.
NOPE -- he used it to gain an advantage.
Now the ragheads are doing naval maneuvers with the Ruski's and the
red Chinese; both of whom are now in the middle east area with some of their most powerful naval vessels; not to mention Iran's navy (all
three speed boats).
Which is in large part because of Trump breaking the deal. So now they DS>are developing nuclear weapons and becoming much more belligerent
because of Trump's treatment of them.
There is no words to describe how badly democrats suck! When they
aren't ginning up false charges they're bending over backwards to
destroy the country!
You are in complete denial and reversal in your statement above. The DS>charges are not false, and it is Trump who is destroying the country.
Dale Shipp wrote to Tim Richardson <=-
You are in complete denial and reversal in your statement above. The charges are not false, and it is Trump who is destroying the country.
You need to take a tour of the Democrat controlled states and cities in RL>the U.S.
On 12-29-19 09:23, Aaron Thomas <=-
is now working toward creating a nuclear weapon again and has become
much more beligerent in other ways.
On 31 Dec 2019, Lee Lofaso said the following...
Hello Greg,
No examples, that's about what what I expected.
He violated his oath of office. What more need be said?
Has the high court made this determination. Nope they have not.
Instead of quoting democratic talking points, such as the following all GD>which have failed. Here are just a few of the baseless accusations.
Bribery - That did not stick.
Quid Pro Quo - That did not stick.
Russian Dossier - That did not stick.
Mueller Report - That did not stick.
Dem Hoax destroyed.
Still waiting for concrete examples of crimes committed as President.
How sad it is that you don't understand the law any better.
Laws were broken.
It was against the law to withhold the military aid to Ukraine for any DS>reason.
It was against the law for Trump to withhold the aid as extortion to DS>obtain a political favor.
It was against the law for Trump to even ask a foreign government for
aid to his political campaign.
It was against the law for Trump to deny any current or previous DS>whitehouse aid to testify in response to a lawful subpoena from
Congress.
Those were all against the law and crimes that Trump committed.
On 02 Jan 2020, Lee Lofaso said the following...
Laws were broken.No Laws were broken. to spite the democrats have said on the matter. Not a
one. LL> As outlined in both articles of impeachment, but not limited to.
So I say IF and that is one BIG "IF" LAWS WERE BROKEN, then why is Pelosi GD>dragging her feet sending this to the Senate for a vote.
Simple because she knows that NO LAWS were broken and they will move to GD>dismiss, and that is just for starters, what comes next is hell unleashed GD>upon the democrats with the calling them to testify.
TIM RICHARDSON wrote to RON LAUZON <=-
You're wasting your time.
You cannot reason with a leftie. They're at a huge disadvantage; they aren't `reasonable' people.
Hello Greg,
Donald J. Trump violated his oath of office, as cited by
two articles of impeachment passed by the House.
The House is a farse as reasons I previously explained.
They did their jobs, impeaching a president for due cause.
Hello Greg,
So I say IF and that is one BIG "IF" LAWS WERE BROKEN, then why is Pelosi
dragging her feet sending this to the Senate for a vote.
Neither of the two articles of impeachment say *if* or *maybe*.
There are no ifs, ands, or buts about it, according to Speaker Pelosi
and the House. Your dearly beloved is guilty as sin. On all counts.
Donald J. Trump violated his oath of office, as cited by
two articles of impeachment passed by the House.
The House is a farse as reasons I previously explained.
They did their jobs, impeaching a president for due cause.
Cause from within their own ego and only that.
No Laws Broke No Crime Committed, by the President.
For this HOAX they will pay at the voting box.
PelosiSo I say IF and that is one BIG "IF" LAWS WERE BROKEN, then why is
dragging her feet sending this to the Senate for a vote.
Neither of the two articles of impeachment say *if* or *maybe*.
There are no ifs, ands, or buts about it, according to Speaker Pelosi
and the House. Your dearly beloved is guilty as sin. On all counts.
Counts? There are no counts, not one single solitary count equates to any
laws broken..
Go Ahead Nancy, make our day and forward these worthless articles of >impeachment to the Senate.
Commit political suicide in the process.
Open the floodgates of hell upon, we will wait, but only for a short time.
TIM RICHARDSON wrote to RON LAUZON <=-
You're wasting your time.
You cannot reason with a leftie. They're at a huge disadvantage; they aren't `reasonable' people.
I already figured that out. But they are fun to taunt. 8)
Hello Greg,
Cause from within their own ego and only that.
No Laws Broke No Crime Committed, by the President.
For this HOAX they will pay at the voting box.
Donald J. Trump has been impeached for life, regardless of what
the Senate does, or does not do.
| Sysop: | Coz |
|---|---|
| Location: | Anoka, MN |
| Users: | 2 |
| Nodes: | 4 (0 / 4) |
| Uptime: | 138:22:42 |
| Calls: | 166 |
| Files: | 5,387 |
| Messages: | 223,165 |