• Re: miracast

    From Doug Cooper@1:227/702 to August Abolins on Sat Jul 18 07:54:24 2020
    It seems that mircast is designed for laptops only. I've read that
    there are USB dongles for PCs that can "broadcast" video to a matching receiver at the TV.
    When I first learned about Win10's support to cast video to another monitor on a network, or to a TV with mircast, I was thinking "I could really use that for entertainment and customer service at
    the shop".
    Before that, I was poised to rig up a dedicated pc at each TV and use
    VNC and cast extended desktop displays to them. But the extra hardware and wiring seemed ridiculous.

    Not sure about the laptop only or not. I did enough research to be able to tell if my PC was capable of the wireless display feature, and bought it. I
    am not a big fan of wireless A/V over wired, however in my case it was a need and the only way to accomplish it without expensive hubs.

    I have wired outdoor speaker planters, to an older Onkyo receiver, and muti-room switcher. It's connected to an airport express and itunes. Prior
    to the airport express it was a 200 disc CD changer. Lets just say that the wiring was a lot of work to get it from the second floor of my home to the
    back yard, and frankly I couldn't hear the difference between
    itunes versus the 200 disc changer as the outdoor speakers were a garage sale find and crap anyway :) Since then I'm more open to wireless tech -- except for my home theater system.

    After owning the Miracast/Microsft WD for a few weeks now, the only minor annoyance is having to reconnect it (in monitor settings) each time Windows reboots. Otherwise I've noticed zero difference between it and the HDMI hard connected display.

    -tG

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A45 2020/02/18 (Windows/32)
    * Origin: The Underground [@] theunderground.us:10023 <-port (1:227/702)
  • From Doug Cooper@1:227/702 to August Abolins on Mon Jul 20 07:56:40 2020
    Does that only happen after a full shutdown/re-boot? Maybe it cooperates better
    when resuming after Hibernate?

    I'm a fan of Hibernate. Things spring back to life much faster.


    It only happens when you do a full shutdown / re-boot, otherwise it never happens. So it's all good; I only get full shut downs when windows updates require such and /or after my js classes. I don't use hibernate as it did
    not seem to gel well with mystic.

    -dC

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A45 2020/02/18 (Windows/32)
    * Origin: The Underground [@] theunderground.us:10023 <-port (1:227/702)