• calling occupants..

    From August Abolins@1:153/757.2 to All on Thu Apr 8 11:26:18 2021
    .. of spaceship tg_support.
    --- SBBSecho 3.14-Linux
    * Origin: The Rusty MailBox - Penticton, BC Canada (1:153/757.2)
  • From Jay Harris@1:229/664 to August Abolins on Thu Apr 8 14:39:28 2021
    *** Quoting August Abolins from a message to All ***

    @TZUTC: -0700
    @MSGID: 35.fido-tgsuppor@1:153/757.2 24d480ee
    @PID: Synchronet 3.19a-Linux master/46c91758e Apr 8 2021 GCC 10.2.0
    @TID: SBBSecho 3.14-Linux master/46c91758e Apr 8 2021 GCC 10.2.0
    @BBSID: TRMB
    @CHRS: ASCII 1
    @PATH 153/757 770/1 280/464 229/101 426

    .. of spaceship tg_support.

    --- SBBSecho 3.14-Linux
    * Origin: The Rusty MailBox - Penticton, BC Canada (1:153/757.2)

    Got you here. Most extraordinary!


    Jay

    ... 3.141592653589793238462643383279502884197169399375105820974944592307816406

    --- Telegard v3.09.g2-sp4/mL
    * Origin: Northern Realms | 289-424-5180 | bbs.nrbbs.net (1:229/664)
  • From Wilfred van Velzen@2:280/464 to August Abolins on Thu Apr 8 21:24:32 2021
    Hi August,

    On 2021-04-08 11:26:19, you wrote to All:

    @MSGID: 35.fido-tgsuppor@1:153/757.2 24d480ee
    @PID: Synchronet 3.19a-Linux master/46c91758e Apr 8 2021 GCC 10.2.0 @TZUTC: -0700
    @TID: SBBSecho 3.14-Linux master/46c91758e Apr 8 2021 GCC 10.2.0
    @BBSID: TRMB
    @CHRS: ASCII 1
    .. of spaceship tg_support.

    Why?

    --- SBBSecho 3.14-Linux
    * Origin: The Rusty MailBox - Penticton, BC Canada (1:153/757.2)
    SEEN-BY: 153/105 135 250 757 802 203/0 220/70 221/0 6 226/17 229/101 SEEN-BY: 261/38 267/800 280/464 301/1 340/1000 396/45 423/120 712/848 SEEN-BY: 770/1 100 340 772/220 230
    @PATH: 153/757 770/1 280/464

    Bye, Wilfred.

    --- FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815
    * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464)
  • From Jay Harris@1:229/664 to Wilfred van Velzen on Thu Apr 8 17:00:22 2021
    *** Quoting Wilfred van Velzen from a message to August Abolins ***

    .. of spaceship tg_support.

    Why?

    My automated message sent out on the 1st is visible on Agency but not on
    Al's system.

    There seems to have been a break somewhere in the link for this echo, but
    it looks like it's cleared up now.


    Jay

    ... Who is General Failure, and why is he reading my disk?
    --- Telegard v3.09.g2-sp4/mL
    * Origin: Northern Realms | 289-424-5180 | bbs.nrbbs.net (1:229/664)
  • From Alan Ianson@1:153/757 to Jay Harris on Thu Apr 8 14:28:00 2021
    Hello Jay,

    My automated message sent out on the 1st is visible on Agency but not
    on Al's system.

    Well, that's discouraging.

    There seems to have been a break somewhere in the link for this echo,
    but it looks like it's cleared up now.

    I'm going to look at my links and see if I can beef it up a bit.

    @PATH: 229/664 426 301/1 280/464 770/1

    This path seems to be working?

    Ttyl :-),
    Al

    --- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20180707
    * Origin: The Rusty MailBox - Penticton, BC Canada (1:153/757)
  • From Jay Harris@1:229/664 to Alan Ianson on Thu Apr 8 18:15:16 2021
    *** Quoting Alan Ianson from a message to Jay Harris ***

    My automated message sent out on the 1st is visible on Agency but not
    on Al's system.

    Well, that's discouraging.

    Here's the message I sent out on April 1st as seen on Nick's system:

    Date: 7:58 am Thu Apr 1, 2021 Number : 104 of 109
    From: Moderator Base : Fidonet/TG_SUPPORT
    To : All Refer #: None
    Subj: Automated Monthly Echo Link Chec Replies: None
    Stat: Sent Origin : 01 Apr 21 06:00:01

    MSGID: 1:229/664@fidonet 87eb9b94
    TZUTC: -0400
    CHRS: ASCII 1
    TID: FastEcho 1.46.1 7731285

    Echo Tag: TG_SUPPORT
    Moderator: Jay Harris, 1:229/664
    Access: Anyone
    Topic: TG_SUPPORT is the support echo for Telegard BBS Software

    ---
    ! Origin: Northern Realms | 289-424-5180 | bbs.nrbbs.net (1:229/664)
    PATH: 229/664 426
    --- Telegard v3.09.g2-sp4/mL
    * Origin: Northern Realms | 289-424-5180 | bbs.nrbbs.net (1:229/664)
  • From Jay Harris@1:229/664 to Alan Ianson on Thu Apr 8 18:18:14 2021
    *** Quoting Alan Ianson from a message to Jay Harris ***

    My automated message sent out on the 1st is visible on Agency but not
    on Al's system.

    Well, that's discouraging.

    Here's the message I sent out on April 1st as seen from Nick's system:

    Date: 7:58 am Thu Apr 1, 2021 Number : 104 of 110
    From: Moderator Base : Fidonet/TG_SUPPORT
    To : All Refer #: None
    Subj: Automated Monthly Echo Link Chec Replies: None
    Stat: Sent Origin : 01 Apr 21 06:00:01

    MSGID: 1:229/664@fidonet 87eb9b94
    TZUTC: -0400
    CHRS: ASCII 1
    TID: FastEcho 1.46.1 7731285
    Echo Tag: TG_SUPPORT
    Moderator: Jay Harris, 1:229/664
    Access: Anyone
    Topic: TG_SUPPORT is the support echo for Telegard BBS Software

    ---
    * Origin: Northern Realms | 289-424-5180 | bbs.nrbbs.net (1:229/664)
    PATH: 229/664 426
    --- Telegard v3.09.g2-sp4/mL
    * Origin: Northern Realms | 289-424-5180 | bbs.nrbbs.net (1:229/664)
  • From Jay Harris@1:229/664 to Alan Ianson on Thu Apr 8 18:30:42 2021
    *** Quoting Alan Ianson from a message to Jay Harris ***

    @PATH 153/757 770/1 280/464 229/101 426 Hello Jay,

    P.S: Here's the path your message took to me.

    Without zone numbers, it's hard to be certain:

    You -> Paul/Avon -> Wilfred -> Frank/Netsurge -> Nick/atreyu

    Without being accusational/assigning blame, etc: I'm wondering if 229/101 was perhaps having issues the same time SciNet was "down"?

    Jay

    ... For every action, there is an equal and opposite criticism.
    --- Telegard v3.09.g2-sp4/mL
    * Origin: Northern Realms | 289-424-5180 | bbs.nrbbs.net (1:229/664)
  • From Alan Ianson@1:153/757.2 to Jay Harris on Thu Apr 8 15:49:50 2021
    Re: Re: calling occupants..
    By: Jay Harris to Alan Ianson on Thu Apr 08 2021 06:30 pm

    Without being accusational/assigning blame, etc: I'm wondering if 229/101 was perhaps having issues the same time SciNet was "down"?

    I send mail in the TG_SUPPORT area to 1:261/38, 2:221/6 and recently 3:770/1 as well as a handful of other nodes.

    You might consider something like that. It can be helpful when one point fails as they will from time to time.

    Ttyl :-),
    Al

    ... I am a Klingon, sir. I do NOT whistle while I work!
    --- SBBSecho 3.14-Linux
    * Origin: The Rusty MailBox - Penticton, BC Canada (1:153/757.2)
  • From Jay Harris@1:229/664 to Alan Ianson on Thu Apr 8 19:30:36 2021
    *** Quoting Alan Ianson from a message to Jay Harris ***

    I send mail in the TG_SUPPORT area to 1:261/38, 2:221/6 and recently 3:770/1 as well as a handful of other nodes.

    You might consider something like that. It can be helpful when one
    point fails as they will from time to time.

    I'm assumung that's where dupe checking comes in?


    Jay

    ... Everybody is somebody else's weirdo.
    --- Telegard v3.09.g2-sp4/mL
    * Origin: Northern Realms | 289-424-5180 | bbs.nrbbs.net (1:229/664)
  • From Alan Ianson@1:153/757.2 to Jay Harris on Thu Apr 8 16:41:54 2021
    Re: Re: calling occupants..
    By: Jay Harris to Alan Ianson on Thu Apr 08 2021 07:30 pm

    You might consider something like that. It can be helpful when one
    point fails as they will from time to time.

    I'm assumung that's where dupe checking comes in?

    Yes, dupe checking is a big part of tossing mail along with the path and seen bys. It's all important. My tosser has no problem with dupes and getting the mail where it needs to go and stopping dupes. :)

    Ttyl :-),
    Al

    ... Is fire supposed to shoot out of it like that!?
    --- SBBSecho 3.14-Linux
    * Origin: The Rusty MailBox - Penticton, BC Canada (1:153/757.2)
  • From Wilfred van Velzen@2:280/464 to Jay Harris on Fri Apr 9 10:54:44 2021
    Hi Jay,

    On 2021-04-08 18:30:43, you wrote to Alan Ianson:

    @PATH 153/757 770/1 280/464 229/101 426 Hello Jay,

    P.S: Here's the path your message took to me.

    Without zone numbers, it's hard to be certain:

    No it isn't, because there are no double net numbers anymore in the fidonet nodelist.

    You -> Paul/Avon -> Wilfred -> Frank/Netsurge -> Nick/atreyu

    You got it right! ;)

    Without being accusational/assigning blame, etc: I'm wondering if
    229/101 was perhaps having issues the same time SciNet was "down"?

    That's likely. But with enough (fidoweb style) links, mail would just route around Frank's system...

    Bye, Wilfred.

    --- FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815
    * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464)
  • From Jay Harris@1:229/664 to Wilfred van Velzen on Fri Apr 9 12:13:10 2021
    *** Quoting Wilfred van Velzen from a message to Jay Harris ***

    @PATH 153/757 770/1 280/464 229/101 426 Hello Jay,

    Without zone numbers, it's hard to be certain:

    No it isn't, because there are no double net numbers anymore in the fidonet nodelist.

    Ah, that's good to know!

    You -> Paul/Avon Frank/Netsurge -> Nick/atreyu

    You got it right! ;)

    *phew* I'm glad I studied for this test! :)

    That's likely. But with enough (fidoweb style) links, mail would just route around Frank's system...

    Now with traffic going out to 229/426 & 153/757 I feel even more connected!
    :)


    Jay

    ... In comparison, there's no comparison.

    --- Telegard v3.09.g2-sp4/mL
    * Origin: Northern Realms | 289-424-5180 | bbs.nrbbs.net (1:229/664)
  • From August Abolins@1:153/757.2 to Wilfred van Velzen on Sat Apr 10 09:20:40 2021
    ...there are no double net numbers anymore in the fidonet
    nodelist.


    The last time I looked about 2 years ago, there were two systems sharing the same net number.
    --- SBBSecho 3.14-Linux
    * Origin: The Rusty MailBox - Penticton, BC Canada (1:153/757.2)
  • From Wilfred van Velzen@2:280/464 to August Abolins on Sat Apr 10 18:38:00 2021
    Hi August,

    On 2021-04-10 09:20:41, you wrote to me:

    ...there are no double net numbers anymore in the fidonet
    nodelist.

    The last time I looked about 2 years ago, there were two systems
    sharing the same net number.

    I very much doubt that. I think it's more than a decade ago, there were double net numbers in the fidonet nodelist.

    Bye, Wilfred.

    --- FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815
    * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464)
  • From August Abolins@1:153/757.2 to Wilfred van Velzen on Sun Aug 29 19:21:42 2021
    On 4/10/2021 12:38 PM, between "Wilfred van Velzen":
    Hi August,

    On 2021-04-10 09:20:41, you wrote to me:

    ...there are no double net numbers anymore in the fidonet
    nodelist.

    The last time I looked about 2 years ago, there were two systems
    sharing the same net number.

    I very much doubt that. I think it's more than a decade ago, there were double net numbers in the fidonet nodelist.



    310 is used in both Z1 and Z2.
    --- SBBSecho 3.14-Linux
    * Origin: The Rusty MailBox - Penticton, BC Canada (1:153/757.2)
  • From Wilfred van Velzen@2:280/464 to August Abolins on Mon Aug 30 09:04:18 2021
    Hi August,

    On 2021-08-29 19:21:42, you wrote to me:

    ...there are no double net numbers anymore in the fidonet
    nodelist.

    The last time I looked about 2 years ago, there were two systems
    sharing the same net number.

    I very much doubt that. I think it's more than a decade ago, there were
    double net numbers in the fidonet nodelist.

    310 is used in both Z1 and Z2.

    Your right, I forgot about that one. It crept back into the nodelist in 2017. The Host (and RC) for that net is incompetent anyway. He never cared to respond to inquiries that were made if he could fix the situation at that time, as far as I remember.

    Bye, Wilfred.

    --- FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815
    * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464)
  • From August Abolins@1:153/757.2 to Wilfred van Velzen on Mon Aug 30 21:26:06 2021
    On 8/30/2021 3:04 AM, between "Wilfred van Velzen": August,

    310 is used in both Z1 and Z2.

    Your right, I forgot about that one. It crept back into the nodelist
    in 2017. The Host (and RC) for that net is incompetent anyway. He
    never cared to respond to inquiries that were made if he could fix
    the situation at that time, as far as I remember.

    Who would have thought that Fido would have a net war! LOL
    --- SBBSecho 3.14-Linux
    * Origin: The Rusty MailBox - Penticton, BC Canada (1:153/757.2)
  • From Wilfred van Velzen@2:280/464 to August Abolins on Tue Aug 31 10:19:34 2021
    Hi August,

    On 2021-08-30 21:26:06, you wrote to me:

    Your right, I forgot about that one. It crept back into the nodelist
    in 2017. The Host (and RC) for that net is incompetent anyway. He
    never cared to respond to inquiries that were made if he could fix
    the situation at that time, as far as I remember.

    Who would have thought that Fido would have a net war! LOL

    It's not a "war"! ;)

    The net's in Z1 and Z2 are both very small and don't have the same nodes until now. So it hasn't become a real problem yet...

    Bye, Wilfred.

    --- FMail-lnx64 2.1.0.18-B20170815
    * Origin: FMail development HQ (2:280/464)