Is the message area "Synchronet Discusion" meant to be a closed area? I
Why would a SysOp make this sub "Synchronet Discussion" a closed area?
didn't get the memo if thats the case. Clarification please?
Why would a SysOp make this sub "Synchronet Discussion" a closed area? Closed meaning only SysOps can post or reply messages. Any thoughts? Other then SysOPs can assign access levels to whatever they want. I know that. Is the message area "Synchronet Discusion" meant to be a closed area? I didn't get the memo
if thats the case. Clarification please?
|07 HusTler
Why would a SysOp make this sub "Synchronet Discussion" a closed
area? Closed meaning only SysOps can post or reply messages. Any
thoughts? Other then SysOPs can assign access levels to whatever they
want. I know that. Is the message area "Synchronet Discusion" meant
to be a closed area? I didn't get the memo if thats the case.
Clarification please?
On Mon, 29 Nov 2021 07:44:23 -0600
"HusTler" <hustler@VERT/PHARCYDE> wrote:
Why would a SysOp make this sub "Synchronet Discussion" a closed
area? Closed meaning only SysOps can post or reply messages. Any
thoughts? Other then SysOPs can assign access levels to whatever they want. I know that. Is the message area "Synchronet Discusion" meant
to be a closed area? I didn't get the memo if thats the case. Clarification please?
The bottom line is a sysop can grant (or not) access to any, all, or
none of the forums they carry. Most have rules and they can raise the
ire of a moderator or group owner. In general, follow the rules, but
they're well in their right to restrict access.
Why would a SysOp make this sub "Synchronet Discussion" a closed area? Closed
meaning only SysOps can post or reply messages. Any thoughts? Other then SysOP
can assign access levels to whatever they want. I know that. Is the message area "Synchronet Discusion" meant to be a closed area? I didn't get the memo if thats the case. Clarification please?
Is the message area "Synchronet Discusion" meant to be a closed area? I
No. This sub is for discussion of Synchronet by all interested parties, as f as I know. Not just sysops.
The "Conferences" table on the DOVE-Net wiki page shows what the access requirements should be:
Why are you asking?
If you saw some BBS that had this area restricted, you should ask the sysop directly. They probably just made a mistake and need to fix it.
well he should ask the sysop of pharcyde. i think nick just did it because h confused it with the synchronet sysop echo. ---I have posting priviliges on Pharcyde. It's another BBS I don't have posting or responding access. I thought it was strange so I asked about it. It's the SysOPs right to remove posting priviliges on any sub he/she wants. I just don't understand the logic behind it. Synchronet is a great BBS program and "Synchronet Discussion" is a great place for folks thinking about running it. Not just SysOPs. There's already too many SysOp to SysOP boards in my opinion. ;-)
Re: Re: Access??
By: MRO to Nelgin on Tue Nov 30 2021 04:48 am
well he should ask the sysop of pharcyde. i think nick just did it because h confused it with the synchronet sysop echo. ---I have posting priviliges on Pharcyde. It's another BBS I don't have posting or responding access. I thought it was strange so I asked about it. It's the SysOPs right to remove posting priviliges on any sub he/she wants. I just don't understand the logic behind it. Synchronet is a great BBS program and "Synchronet Discussion" is a great place for folks thinking about running it. Not just SysOPs. There's already too many SysOp to SysOP boards in my opinion. ;-)
because h confused it with the synchronet sysop echo. ---I have posting priviliges on Pharcyde. It's another BBS I don't have posting or responding access. I thought it was strange so I asked about it. It's the SysOPs right to remove posting priviliges on any sub he/she wants. I just don't understand the logic behind it. Synchronet is a great BBS program and "Synchronet Discussion" is a great place for folks thinking about running it. Not just SysOPs. There's already too many SysOp to SysOP boards in my opinion. ;-)
Sysop: | Coz |
---|---|
Location: | Anoka, MN |
Users: | 2 |
Nodes: | 4 (0 / 4) |
Uptime: | 08:31:34 |
Calls: | 97 |
Files: | 4,623 |
Messages: | 216,825 |