Source: Fox News
Title: Jesse Watters: Devon Archer just flipped on the Bidens, and it's bad The 50 Million Dollar Man / Joe Biden https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pVClVeLDDNk
Source: Fox News
Source: Fox News
Title: Jesse Watters: Devon Archer just flipped on the Bidens, and it's bad The 50 Million Dollar Man / Joe Biden https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pVClVeLDDNk
We just have to see what to see what happens.Source: Fox News
Title: Jesse Watters: Devon Archer just flipped on the Bidens, and it's b
The 50 Million Dollar Man / Joe Biden https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pVClVeLDDNk
That (as I suspected) turns out to be more fox news lies.
That (as I suspected) turns out to be more fox news lies.We just have to see what to see what happens.
Ya know if he (Biden) wasn't corrupt, he would not have to worry about the Republicans uncovering anything.
History will more than likley show that Joe Biden was the most corrupt person to hold the office of the Presidency in all of U.S. History.
Joe Biden lied many times, when he said he had nothing to do with Hunter's business dealings. This is a obvious lie due the sworn testimony from Devon Archer that Joe Biden was called and spoke on the phone at least 20 times, at these Business meetings with Hunter and his associates of foreign business partners at these meetings.That (as I suspected) turns out to be more fox news lies.We just have to see what to see what happens.
We do see what has happened.
Ya know if he (Biden) wasn't corrupt, he would not have to worry about th
Republicans uncovering anything.
What makes you think Joe Biden is worried?
It's amazing Trump ended his term as U.S. President in January of 2022, and still in August of 2023 he is still much in the news and on the minds rent free of libs everywhere. All of these phony indictments designed to slow him down, because the left is so terrified that Trump will win and if that happens it will be worse then death for these people on the left who craveHistory will more than likley show that Joe Biden was the most corrupt pe
to hold the office of the Presidency in all of U.S. History.
History will tell the Joe Biden story when the time comes.
The Donald Trump story will also be told although much of it is only unfolding now.
Yes, Devon Archer said there were at east 20 phone calls and he also
said The Bidens were not talking business.
The Biden's were selling access... All Hunter had to do was show the people/clients that he could call his father at any time.
Did the story change?
The story changed more than Hunter changed prostitutes.
That's the right wing spin that has been going around for years but that is not what Devon Archer said.
The story changed more than Hunter changed prostitutes.
The spin has changed, the facts are unchanged.
The story changed more than Hunter changed prostitutes.
The spin has changed, the facts are unchanged.
Is it mushroom season still??
Why oh why, are we talking about Hunter Biden?
This "mushroom season" talk is yet more spin.
Why oh why, are we talking about Hunter Biden?
This "mushroom season" talk is yet more spin.
No... but it would explain some of your answers
That last bit about the Biden's not talking business is lefty-spin fromWhat makes you think Joe Biden is worried?Joe Biden lied many times,
That's what I keep hearing.
when he said he had nothing to do with Hunter's business dealings. This i
obvious lie due the sworn testimony from Devon Archer that Joe Biden was called and spoke on the phone at least 20 times, at these Business meetin
with Hunter and his associates of foreign business partners at these meetings.
Yes, Devon Archer said there were at east 20 phone calls and he also
said The Bidens were not talking business.
Those indictments are not phony.The Washington case is very weak have you read the indictment?
Yes, Devon Archer said there were at east 20 phone calls and he alsoThat last bit about the Biden's not talking business is lefty-spin from
said The Bidens were not talking business.
Rep. Daniel Goldman, he is trying to save face.
This spin is factually false for many reasons.
1. What did "no experience" Hunter bring to the table to offer, he knew nothing of gas or oil, he said as much on Good Morning America.
It is clear as to his of his involvement, access to his father Joe Biden, VP.
2 The DOJ via Joe Biden tried to intimidate Devon Archer with a mailings of a threating letter [this was almost right out of the movie Goodfellas] from the DOJ on a Saturday - this is noteworthy because it almost never happens.
3 Do you know why Devon Archer testified in the first place, because he felt like was thrown under the bus and felt betrayed by the Bidens.
The three facts show that the spin from Goldman is categorically false. Sounds like a Crock of Schiff.
Those indictments are not phony.The Washington case is very weak have you read the indictment?
This will fall apart when it hits at a high speed or any at any speed against the Freedom of Speech protections.
The indictment is about Trump's spoken words not about at what happened at the Capitol.
You've got that the wrong way around. The indictment is about Donald Trump's actions, not his speech.
You've got that the wrong way around. The indictment is about Donald
Trump's actions, not his speech.
Funny....
can you quote what part of the indictment that talks about action??
You've got that the wrong way around. The indictment is about Donald
Trump's actions, not his speech.
Funny....
What do you find funny?
The whole thing is about Donald Trumps actions.
There are only 4 charges, joe. Read the indictment over.
But why are we talking about Hunter Biden?
Would you rather talk about Trump?
That is what Trump likes to talk about.
So why shouldn't we all?
Nothing in the indictment had anything to do with his actions... They are
trying to indict him on his thoughts... You might want to read or re-read the
indictment... and when you do can you please tell me the part where it says Tramp did this or that...
The whole thing is about Donald Trumps actions.There is nothing that says Trump DID this or that... You don't listen to the news do you??
There are only 4 charges, joe. Read the indictment over.
What they are saying is that Trump knew he lost the election and rather than accepting the loss he concocted a story about election fraud... and knowing that he lost he lied and went with the election fraud story.
Trump has always believed his election was stolen, he doesn't believe Joe Bide
won and he's lying... BUT rather he believes it was stolen.
I saw Trumps lawyer talking on the news and Trump is actually pumped on this
indictment.... He'll now have the ability to show in court the evidence he has >about the election issues... and he can subpoena some of the players who rigge
the election.
Why oh why, are we talking about Hunter Biden?
This "mushroom season" talk is yet more spin.
No... but it would explain some of your answers
You don't care much for the truth.
But why are we talking about Hunter Biden?
After the election Donald Trump did go to court saying the election was stolen but he was not successful. The indictment also talks about that.Hillary Clinton and her supporters threw a fit and created hell on Earth when she lost the election, but what Hillary did next was to install a fake narrative of Russia Russia Russia, which hung over the nation.
No... but it would explain some of your answers
What does it matter? Lots of people get jobs in a field where they have no pre
ous experience.
The DOJ has not attempted to stop, or even slow down Donald Trump. Others charged with similar crimes are held in custody while awaiting trial.
That is not the case with Donald Trump. He is free to go where he wants, travel where he wants and speak to who he wants (aside from co-defendants). He is free to campaign at will.
The indictment alleges that Trump conspired with co-conspirators to defraud the United States by using dishonesty, fraud and deceit to
impair, obstruct and defeat the lawful federal government function by which the results of the presidential election are collected, counted
and certified by the federal government.
That is what Donald Trump did. The indictment goes on...
That is not news. That is from the indictment.
It's a free country Joe. You can believe anything at all. You can say anything at all.
This indictment is about Donald Trumps actions.
After the election Donald Trump did go to court saying the election was stolen but he was not successful. The indictment also talks about that.
The election is not going to be re-litigated now, Donald Trumps actions will be.
He doesn't have to be stoned to answer in that manner, it comes naturally to him. ;)
But why are we talking about Hunter Biden?
Would you rather talk about Trump?
Sure, if you want to talk about Trump go ahead.
That is what Trump likes to talk about.
So why shouldn't we all?
There is nothing to talk about. Hunter is a private citizen.
He is not president, has never been president, will never be president.
I don't think he has or will run for any office.
After the election Donald Trump did go to court saying the election was
stolen but he was not successful. The indictment also talks about that.
Hillary Clinton and her supporters threw a fit and created hell on Earth when she lost the election, but what Hillary did next was to install a fake
narrative of Russia Russia Russia, which hung over the nation.
"Not my president" was the chant from her followers.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=LoMhBo8ATBM
Where was the DOJ to indite her w/ her actions, with the hell she has put
the country through.
The election is not going to be re-litigated now, Donald Trumps actions
will be.
Sorry.... It's never been in a court...
Cowards... judges always declined to
see the case because of one reason or an other... Though I was frustrated at the courts lack of enthusiasm.... I heard arguments that this is a political and not a legal issue...
I came across this video after I sent my last response...
https://rumble.com/v33zh3k-trump-will-now-have-subpoena-power-to-re-litigate-e
ery-case-from-the-2020-.html
This is the issue at hand... there needs to be more talk and less criminalization... If Biden is soooooooooooo confident his policies are the best... debate them.
Hillary Clinton acted honorably, and conceded to Trump. Not once
did she question the results, or challenge the results in court.
Where was the DOJ to indite her w/ her actions, with the hell she has pu the country through.Hillary was investigated.
There is nothing to talk about. Hunter is a private citizen.
So is Donald Trump.
He is not president, has never been president, will never be president.
You do not know that.
I don't think he has or will run for any office.
Why should he? He has open access to wherever he wants to go.
The West Wing, the Situation Room, the Rose Garden ...
The DOJ has not attempted to stop, or even slow down Donald Trump. Others
charged with similar crimes are held in custody while awaiting trial.
That is not the case with Donald Trump. He is free to go where he wants,
travel where he wants and speak to who he wants (aside from
co-defendants). He is free to campaign at will.
Who are the "others charged with similar crimes?"
How similar are their crimes?
The allegations break down like this... The government says that Trump KNEW he lost the election...
BUT chose to not believe it and chose to BELIEVE the election was stolen.
The conspiracy side of the charges stem from the legal advice he received about the electoral certification process...
During the 2020 election 5 states sent in a double set of electors... these states did so after being presented with voting irregularities...
As per the constitution the electors are sent in by the state legislators and if there is a discrepancy the state legislators were asked to clarify...
VP Judas Pence wasn't made to chose what ones were to be seated... Judas was asked to ask the state legislators what they wanted done...
That is not news. That is from the indictment.
I know it's not news... There are legal experts talking about this... I just think you lack the skill set... and the knowledge of the Constitution and as well rudimentary knowledge of US history to make opinions such as the ones you make.
It's a free country Joe. You can believe anything at all. You can say
anything at all.
And so can Trump.... and now for the first time in post constitutional US history one party is trying to criminalize Thoughts and beliefs.
Lot's of people do not get *high-level* jobs in fields where they have no previous experience. Only people with connections get to do that, which is where the problem lies.
The DOJ has not attempted to stop, or even slow down Donald Trump. Othe >> charged with similar crimes are held in custody while awaiting trial. >> That is not the case with Donald Trump. He is free to go where he wants >> travel where he wants and speak to who he wants (aside from
co-defendants). He is free to campaign at will.
Who are the "others charged with similar crimes?"
There have been many. Look it up.
How similar are their crimes?
The crimes involved classified documents. Small change compared to the Donald.
The crimes involved classified documents. Small change compared to the
Donald.
You're parroting, bigtime!
The election is not going to be re-litigated now, Donald Trumps actions >> will be.
Sorry.... It's never been in a court...
What!? ;)
Judges have seen the case over and over again. Trump has no evidence.
You are not going to get any truth from fox news.
Sorry.... It's never been in a court...
What!? ;)
Any of the attempts to get the election cases into court were thrown out based on standing.... NONE were ever tossed based on merit...
No evidence presented no jury made a decision... Never went to trial ever.
Here's a video ... if you go to minute 6:19 and his point point ends at ~7 minutes in. That 40 seconds explains the why some states send in 2 sets of electors and he also talks about how all the court cases were rejected based on standing... I love the look at the CNN hosts who had no clue...
https://youtu.be/fI0Gmkv4oGQ
Judges have seen the case over and over again. Trump has no evidence.
Judges have never seen any case... All were rejected based on standing... When Trump goes to trial for this case it'll be the first time a jury will see the evidence.
You are not going to get any truth from fox news.
I'm not going to get any truth from you...
Hunter Biden is not in government in any way, never has been (so far).Hunter was the bag man, and his Father was the closer.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?app=desktop&v=LoMhBo8ATBM
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=H916EVndP_A
Where was the DOJ to indite her w/ her actions, with the hellshe has put the country through.
Hillary was investigated.
That is not news. That is from the indictment.
I just think
you lack the skill set... and the knowledge of the Constitution and as well r udimentary knowledge of US history to make opinions such as the ones you make.
The DOJ has not attempted to stop, or even slow down Donald Trump. Others >AI> charged with similar crimes are held in custody while awaiting trial.
That is not the case with Donald Trump. He is free to go where he wants, >AI> travel where he wants and speak to who he wants (aside from
co-defendants). He is free to campaign at will.
Who are the "others charged with similar crimes?"
How similar are their crimes?
Where was the DOJ to indite her w/ her actions, with the hell she has put the country through.
Hillary was investigated.
Who are the "others charged with similar crimes?"
There have been many. Look it up.
Trump did in fact go to court many times.
Trump went to court without evidence.
You think correctly. :)
Hunter Biden is not in government in any way, never has been (so far).Hunter was the bag man, and his Father was the closer.
The Brand does not exist without Joe Biden.
Comer Releases Devon Archer's Transcribed Interview Transcript
Source: https://oversight.house.gov
https://tinyurl.com/3s7stzsn
How similar are their crimes?
I don't know who, if anyone, Al is thinking of. The case I have heard
others mention is the recent one involving the solider from the Pentagon.
He not only had documents he shouldn't, he tried peddling the information over the Internet, which was what made his charges worse and landed him in jail. The cases are not actually similar.
Where was the DOJ to indite her w/ her actions, with the hell she has put >> > the country through.
Hillary was investigated.
For other things, not for any actions that resulted from the 2016 election.
There have been many. Look it up.
It is up to you to put up or shut up. You claim there are many others. Please supply examples, including how the crimes are similar and
remembering that Trump is not currently charged with trying to sell any of the document contents.
I'm just pointing out that others have been jailed because of these
types of crimes. Many times.
If it happened so many times then why don't you have any examples?
It's ok Al.
I used to be a parrot also. Back around 2020 I thought Fox News was the coolest thing ever, and I blindly followed their narratives and I thought that everything they said was true, but then I realized that they were full of it and that I too was full of it because I was parroting their lies.
But the lesson I learned was: admitting to your mistakes is way to go. That philosophy might not sell cars, but it builds integrity.
No Judge or Jury has seen the evidence of election fraud... PERIOD...
ALL cases were dismissed based on standing.... ALL!!!
I sent you a video, though it was fox news... I told you where to go in that video to see a CNN segment where the person who was asked to join the segment SCHOOLED the CNN hosts on 2 issues... 1, the electoral college and how it's certified and 2, the fact that all the election cases were never heard because of standing... He did this all in ~40 seconds and he left the hosts speechless...
Trump went to court without evidence.
Trump has evidence and it'll now be heard in a court of law...
The crimes involved classified documents. Small change compared to the
Donald.
You're parroting, bigtime!
I'm not parroting anything/anyone.
I'm just pointing out that others have been jailed because of these
types of crimes. Many times.
Hunter Biden is not in government in any way, never has been (so far).Hunter was the bag man, and his Father was the closer.
The Brand does not exist without Joe Biden.
Comer Releases Devon Archer's Transcribed Interview Transcript
Source: https://oversight.house.gov
https://tinyurl.com/3s7stzsn
Who are the "others charged with similar crimes?"
How similar are their crimes?
I don't know who, if anyone, Al is thinking of. The case I have heard
He not only had documents he shouldn't, he tried peddling the information over the Internet, which was what made his charges worse and landed him
in jail. The cases are not actually similar.
The crimes involved classified documents. Small change compared to t >> >> Donald.
You're parroting, bigtime!
I'm not parroting anything/anyone.
I'm just pointing out that others have been jailed because of these
types of crimes. Many times.
Here are a few I found simply with google.
Here are a few I found simply with google.
The first 2 plead guilty, that's why they went to jail. The 3rd one was found guilty, and that's why he went to jail. Plus he was found with grenades. How many grenades did they catch Trump with?
The first 2 plead guilty, that's why they went to jail. The 3rd one was guilty, and that's why he went to jail. Plus he was found with grenades. many grenades did they catch Trump with?
I'm not talking convictions, I am simply saying that many others have
been charged under the espionage act, grenades or not.
Aaron Thomas wrote to Alan Ianson <=-
But the lesson I learned was: admitting to your mistakes is way to go. That philosophy might not sell cars, but it builds integrity.
Wither you like it or not Donald Trump will be permitted to provide evidence that disproves the allegations that are brought against him.No Judge or Jury has seen the evidence of election fraud... PERIOD...
ALL cases were dismissed based on standing.... ALL!!!
Not all. I think the Texas case (the Texas GOP, not Trump) was dismissed based on standing, and even Trumps cases could have been thrown out for lack of standing but many cases were dismissed because of a lack of evidence.
I sent you a video, though it was fox news... I told you where to go in t
video to see a CNN segment where the person who was asked to join the seg
SCHOOLED the CNN hosts on 2 issues... 1, the electoral college and how i
certified and 2, the fact that all the election cases were never heard because of standing... He did this all in ~40 seconds and he left the hos
speechless...
The video? How about some facts rather than stories?
Trump went to court without evidence.
Trump has evidence and it'll now be heard in a court of law...
I don't think so. Donald Trump is the one on trial, not the election.
I'm not talking convictions, I am simply saying that many others have
been charged under the espionage act, grenades or not.
You said "small change compared to Trump," but sounds like some large coins to me.
Wither you like it or not Donald Trump will be permitted to provide evidence that disproves the allegations that are brought against him.
All 3 indictments have issues with weakness,
and they show the true nature of a persecution of a political opponent.
There have been many. Look it up.
It is up to you to put up or shut up. You claim there are many others.
Please supply examples, including how the crimes are similar and
remembering that Trump is not currently charged with trying to sell any of
the document contents.
Indeed there are many others who have been charged under the espionage act.
Do you really need me to look that up for you?
Hunter Biden is not in government in any way, never has been (so far).Hunter was the bag man, and his Father was the closer.
The Brand does not exist without Joe Biden.
Comer Releases Devon Archer's Transcribed Interview Transcript
Source: https://oversight.house.gov
https://tinyurl.com/3s7stzsn
I don't see evidence of a crime.
What is the crime?
I don't think so. Donald Trump is the one on trial, not the election.
Wither you like it or not Donald Trump will be permitted to provide evidence
that disproves the allegations that are brought against him.
All 3 indictments have issues with weakness, and they show the true nature of a persecution of a political opponent.
Trump is facing 4 indictments, and could be sentenced to 5, 10,Jack Smith has lost more cases than he has won, he is a loser, like you.
or 20 years. Quite a stretch for man his age. The charges are real,
and he is facing serious time in prison. Jack Smith is not kidding,
and nobody else is, either.
It's time you face the music, Greg.You going to be very disappointed, when things don't go you way.
Trump's goose is cooked. He is going to prison.Not only is he NOT going to Jail, but Trump has lived for 77 years and all of this time he has not faced one indictment to the kind he is facing now.
And then the American people (and the world) will forget about him.or there could be another civil war, and I will playing for the Red team.
Gregory Deyss wrote to Lee Lofaso <=-
You going to be very disappointed, when things don't go you way.
Nothing new for you though, right?
I think today is the last day I respond to Mr. Man... He is willfully ignorant.
It's okay to have an opinion, or opine, but MY GOD... completely ignore US hist
ory, the constitution and US law is an other.
I don't know who, if anyone, Al is thinking of. The case I have heard others mention is the recent one involving the solider from the Pentagon.
That is the case I am thinking of. I forget the young mans's name.
He not only had documents he shouldn't, he tried peddling the information over the Internet, which was what made his charges worse and landed him in jail. The cases are not actually similar.
I thought he was simply showing off the document. Sound familiar?
There have been many. Look it up.
It is up to you to put up or shut up. You claim there are many others. Please supply examples, including how the crimes are similar and remembering that Trump is not currently charged with trying to sell any of the document contents.
Indeed there are many others who have been charged under the espionage act.
Do you really need me to look that up for you?
Robert Birchum, 2023
Birchum, who was an Air Force lieutenant colonel with a decorated 29-year mili
ry career, pleaded guilty in February to one count of violating the willful re
ntion of national defense information provision after investigators discovered
uring the first month of the Trump presidency in 2017 that Birchum had stored re than 300 classified documents or files in his home, a storage pod on his pr
erty and his officer.s quarters overseas. Birchum was not charged with spying
giving the documents to anyone, and he cooperated with investigators and conv
ed remorse . but a Trump-appointed judge sentenced him this month to 3 years i
prison.
Kendra Kingsbury, 2022
Kingsbury, who was an analyst for the FBI, pleaded guilty in 2022 to two count
of violating the willful retention of national defense information provision a
er she was indicted by a federal grand jury in 2021 for possessing classified cuments in her home. The Justice Department said Kingsbury took home approxima
ly 386 classified documents from work over more than 12 years, including secre
information related to counterterrorism intelligence sources and methods, open
nvestigations, the FBI.s technical capabilities, intelligence gaps, and al Qae
in Africa. Kingsbury, who was not charged with spying or giving documents to yone, is scheduled to be sentenced next week.
Jeremy Brown, 2022
Brown, a retired Army Special Forces sergeant who later became involved with f
-right group the Oath Keepers and ran for the Florida state House as a Republi
n, was convicted by a federal jury in 2022 for both possession of unregistered
renades and guns and for violating the willful retention of national defense i
ormation provision. When the FBI searched Brown.s home in 2021 upon arresting m over his alleged involvement in the pro-Trump riot at the US Capitol on Janu
y 6, 2021, they found the unlawful weapons and a classified .Trip Report. he h
written in 2011 about the search in Afghanistan for missing soldier Bowe Berg
hl. Brown was sentenced in April to 7 years and 3 months in prison, though not
olely over the classified document.
The crimes involved classified documents. Small change compared to >> >> Donald.
You're parroting, bigtime!
I'm not parroting anything/anyone.
I'm just pointing out that others have been jailed because of these >> types of crimes. Many times.
Here are a few I found simply with google.
The first 2 plead guilty, that's why they went to jail. The 3rd one was found ilty, and that's why he went to jail. Plus he was found with grenades. How man
grenades did they catch Trump with?
The first 2 plead guilty, that's why they went to jail. The 3rd one was foun
guilty, and that's why he went to jail. Plus he was found with grenades. How
many grenades did they catch Trump with?
I'm not talking convictions, I am simply saying that many others have been cha
ed under the espionage act, grenades or not.
grenades did they catch Trump with?
Remember that Al's original claim was that several people have done the same thing that Trump is accused of AND were kept in jail awaiting trial while Trump is out campaigning as a free man.
Trump is facing 4 indictments, and could be sentenced to 5, 10,
or 20 years. Quite a stretch for man his age. The charges are real,
and he is facing serious time in prison. Jack Smith is not kidding,
and nobody else is, either.
Jack Smith has lost more cases than he has won, he is a loser, like you.
It's time you face the music, Greg.
You going to be very disappointed, when things don't go you way.
Nothing new for you though, right?
Trump's goose is cooked. He is going to prison.
Not only is he NOT going to Jail, but Trump has lived for 77 years and all of this time he has not faced one indictment to the kind he is facing now.
Tell me again, how this is a not a political circus.
And then the American people (and the world) will forget about LL>him.
or there could be another civil war, and I will playing for the Red team.
You really want a re-match?
How about we just duke it out here with words.
You're a lightweight & you don't present any challenge in the slightest of measure.
I thought he was simply showing off the document. Sound familiar?
Show me where Trump was trying to sell the documents over the Internet for money. Otherwise, no, it does not sound at all familiar.
Indeed there are many others who have been charged under the espionage act.
Do you really need me to look that up for you?
The Espionage Act is very broad.
A person can be charged or accused of violating it for a wide range of offenses, some *much* more serious (and completely different) than others.
What you need to show us are the exact cases where someone got charged, and was kept in prison awaiting trial, for violating it in the manner that Trump is accused of. THAT was your claim.
So far, all you have given us is "I don't remember his name."
I am not going to do research to prove *your* point.
That is up to you to do. If there are so many examples of persons who have recently done exactly what Trump is accused of, and had to stay in prison awaiting trial, you should have no problem producing at least one example.
Your claim was that people were kept in prison awaiting trial for retention of documents while Trump is free to campaign.
Trump was not in possession of any unregistered weapons.
People who are in trouble on weapons charges are considred to pose a different risk and are often kept in jail awaiting trial (although you
didn't prove that Brown was).
That part sounds more familiar to what Hunter Biden did.
He is not being kept in jail for his weapons charge while the courts decide whether or not to accept his plea deal.
Please provide examples of persons who were kept in jail, awaiting trial,
for the willful retention of documents, which is what Trump is accused of
and which is what you claimed has happened to others.
Which was NOT your original point.
Please provide evidence of persons who retained documents, but who didn't
try to sell them or post them on the Internet, who were kept in jail
awaiting trial. That was your original point.
Remember that Al's original claim was that several people have done the
same thing that Trump is accused of AND were kept in jail awaiting trial
while Trump is out campaigning as a free man.
He's either on a mission to be correct about something political or he's on a mission to defend all things leftist, but he can't have it both ways.
It makes me wonder if there's money in it? Can I get rich by defending all things leftist?
Indeed there are many others who have been charged under the espionage act. >> Do you really need me to look that up for you?The Espionage Act is very broad. A person can be charged or accused of violating it for a wide range of offenses, some *much* more serious (and completely different) than others.
What you need to show us are the exact cases where someone got charged, and was kept in prison awaiting trial, for violating it in the manner that Trump is accused of. THAT was your claim.
He's either on a mission to be correct about something political or he's mission to defend all things leftist, but he can't have it both ways.
Mike is lying to you. My point was that many have been charged under the espionage act.
He's either on a mission to be correct about something political or he's >> > mission to defend all things leftist, but he can't have it both ways.
Mike is lying to you. My point was that many have been charged under the
espionage act.
You said something like "others have been held in jail for similar charges" which is sorta true, but they were suspects who had plead guilty and 1 was found guilty.
Don't let this dose of reallity blind you: There are people behind bars for illegal gun possession, but not Hunter. (Special treatment is for Democrats and their family members.)
Hunter never used the gun in a crime. He didn't threaten anyone with a gun.
What shall we convict hunter of today?There should be no more sweetheart deals for Hunter specially surrounding or offering immunity for crimes that are discovered in the future.
Guns are not uncommon in the USA.You should know what is also uncommon?
Mike Powell wrote to IB JOE <=-
Teacher: "That is the strongest debate stance I have ever witnessed!
A+!"
illegal gun possession, but not Hunter. (Special treatment is for AI> AI> > > Democr
and their family members.)
Hunter never used the gun in a crime. He didn't threaten anyone with a gun.
What shall we convict hunter of today?
Guns are not uncommon in the USA.
Remember that Al's original claim was that several people have done the same thing that Trump is accused of AND were kept in jail awaiting trial while Trump is out campaigning as a free man.
He's either on a mission to be correct about something political or he's on a ssion to defend all things leftist, but he can't have it both ways.
Hunter never used the gun in a crime. He didn't threaten anyone with a
gun.
Hunter Biden was charged with possession of a firearm while an unlawful user of or addicted to any controlled substance, which carries a potential prison term of up to 10 years.
What shall we convict hunter of today?There should be no more sweetheart deals for Hunter specially surrounding or offering immunity for crimes that are discovered in the future.
What a bonehead. The media tells us this was a Trump Judge, this should be the commonsense of ANY Judge. No one should provide a get out of Jail Free card.
Guns are not uncommon in the USA.You should know what is also uncommon?
Lying on the application to acquire a firearm, because he thought he is better then anyone else or that the laws are for other people.
There are lots of local news stories of people going to jail for illegal gun possession. Felons can't have them, if the guns are unregistered then nobody can have them, if they are a banned model, nobody can have them. Illegal gun possession is a real thing. It don't matter if they used it to threaten somebody or not. All that matters, is whether or not they have elite status.
Do you have elite status? Or do you aspire to gain that status someday?
So the judge concluded that this person might pose a threat to the community and may flee if released. Trump, by your own admission is campaigning to be President and, since he cannot be President if he flees the country, is not a flight risk. You have also shown no proof that he himself is any more of a threat to the community whether free or behind bars.
So, again, surprise you have not proven anything.
Hunter never used the gun in a crime. He didn't threaten anyone with a >> gun.
Hunter Biden was charged with possession of a firearm while an unlawful u
of or addicted to any controlled substance, which carries a potential pri
term of up to 10 years.
Sure, and Hunter is in court currently. The outcome will be known soon enough.
What shall we convict hunter of today?There should be no more sweetheart deals for Hunter specially surrounding
offering immunity for crimes that are discovered in the future.
What a bonehead. The media tells us this was a Trump Judge, this should b
the commonsense of ANY Judge. No one should provide a get out of Jail Fre
card.
Hunter never got a "sweetheart" deal or a get out of jail free card.
Hunter never got a "sweetheart" deal or a get out of jail free card.
Now you should really know better then to question me.
Specially when you know that I will provide FACTS to the contrary.
Here ya go the following proves that you were 100% incorrect with your statement.
Source: https://www.newsweek.com (it's pretty bad if it's Newsweek.
Title: Hunter Biden's 'Sweetheart' Plea Deal Falls Apart During Hearing Website: https://tinyurl.com/2bka2ewj
But both sides said the bargain was off the table after U.S. District Judge Maryellen Noreika, who is presiding over the case in Wilmington, Delaware, questioned if the deal offered the president's son blanket immunity from prosecution in his plea dealings or only for his tax offenses. After the top prosecutor said it would not offer sweeping immunity, Biden's attorney declared the agreement "null and void."
possession is a real thing. It don't matter if they used it to threaten somebody or not. All that matters, is whether or not they have elite AI> > sta
Indeed the number of guns, legal and illegal in the USA is astounding.
Do you have elite status? Or do you aspire to gain that status someday?
I am hardly elite. I've been a working stiff my whole life living
paycheck to paycheck.
Indeed the number of guns, legal and illegal in the USA is astounding.
It's a problem. Innocent people are getting killed by bullets too often. But we'll just ignore that issue if that's what it takes to protect good ol' Hunter.
I am hardly elite. I've been a working stiff my whole life living
paycheck to paycheck.
Members of the Canadian Liberal Party aren't as oppressive as America's Democrat Party is. They build security fences around their vacation homes and workplaces while forcing us to contend with an influx of millions of illegal immigrants. It's not fair, and they don't deserve all the praise you give them.
Sweeping immunity for past and future offenses not yet discovered?Source: https://www.newsweek.com (it's pretty bad if it's Newsweek. Title: Hunter Biden's 'Sweetheart' Plea Deal Falls Apart During Hearing Website: https://tinyurl.com/2bka2ewj
It's true that Hunter's plea deal fell apart. Nevertheless, it was not a "sweetheart" deal.
But both sides said the bargain was off the table after U.S. District Jud
Maryellen Noreika, who is presiding over the case in Wilmington, Delaware
questioned if the deal offered the president's son blanket immunity from prosecution in his plea dealings or only for his tax offenses. After the
prosecutor said it would not offer sweeping immunity, Biden's attorney declared the agreement "null and void."
Just how this will proceed I don't know, and I don't care.You have been carrying in here for quite some time, dodging, weaving and ducking that is all over now. I think you care a great deal because you were the one who said that Hunter did not receive a sweetheart deal.
What do you think the outcome would be for the rest of us with those same kind offensives. hmmm? Yeah? I thought so....
Just how this will proceed I don't know, and I don't care.You have been carrying in here for quite some time, dodging, weaving and ducking that is all over now. I think you care a great deal because you were the one who said that Hunter did not receive a sweetheart deal.
It is obvious to anyone with a scintilla of a brain. Don't care, indeed. Bottom-line his lawyers got greedy. Which is why he walked out court with his proverbial tail tucked between his legs with no deal.
Sweeping Immunity? Now theres a subject to discuss around the water cooler. He is guilty as sin and so is his geriatric father as well.
If your going to peddle any more garage in here, remember I will be watching. I will counter you move for move. Choose wisely.
Gregory Deyss wrote to Alan Ianson <=-
Now you should really know better then to question me.
Specially when you know that I will provide FACTS to the contrary.
Hunter never got a "sweetheart" deal or a get out of jail free card.
Now you should really know better then to question me.
Specially when you know that I will provide FACTS to the contrary.
Here ya go the following proves that you were 100% incorrect with your stateme
.
Source: https://www.newsweek.com (it's pretty bad if it's Newsweek.
Title: Hunter Biden's 'Sweetheart' Plea Deal Falls Apart During Hearing Website: https://tinyurl.com/2bka2ewj
If your going to peddle any more garbage in here, remember I will be watching. >I will counter you move for move. Choose wisely.
HearingSource: https://www.newsweek.com (it's pretty bad if it's Newsweek.
Title: Hunter Biden's 'Sweetheart' Plea Deal Falls Apart During
Website: https://tinyurl.com/2bka2ewj
It's true that Hunter's plea deal fell apart. Nevertheless, it wasnot a
"sweetheart" deal.
Sweeping immunity for past and future offenses not yet discovered?
That's sickening sweet; like the kind of sweet that is found on a birthday cake from the supermarket.
What do you think the outcome would be for the rest of us with those same kind offensives. hmmm? Yeah? I thought so....
District JudBut both sides said the bargain was off the table after U.S.
DelawareMaryellen Noreika, who is presiding over the case in Wilmington,
fromquestioned if the deal offered the president's son blanket immunity
After theprosecution in his plea dealings or only for his tax offenses.
attorneyprosecutor said it would not offer sweeping immunity, Biden's
declared the agreement "null and void."
Just how this will proceed I don't know, and I don't care.
You have been carrying in here for quite some time, dodging, weaving and ducking that is all over now. I think you care a great deal because you were the one who said that Hunter did not receive a sweetheart deal.
It is obvious to anyone with a scintilla of a brain. Don't care, indeed. Bottom-line his lawyers got greedy. Which is why he walked out court with his proverbial tail tucked between his legs with no deal.
Sweeping Immunity?
Now theres a subject to discuss around the water cooler.
He is guilty as sin and so is his geriatric father as well.
If your going to peddle any more garage in here, remember I will be watching. I will counter you move for move. Choose wisely.
| Sysop: | Coz |
|---|---|
| Location: | Anoka, MN |
| Users: | 2 |
| Nodes: | 4 (0 / 4) |
| Uptime: | 56:53:16 |
| Calls: | 99 |
| Files: | 4,655 |
| Messages: | 216,434 |