1. Forum
  2. FidoNet
  3. FUTURE4FIDO

  • PVT messages Fido->Telegram

    From August Abolins@2:221/1.58 to Stas Mishchenkov on Tue Aug 18 19:52:00 2020
    Hello Stas!

    ** On Tuesday 18.08.20 - 14:52, Stas Mishchenkov wrote to Tony Langdon:

    Now you can write private messages from Fido to
    Telegram. You only need to know the user ID of the
    addressee in order to substitute it in the field
    ToName. Each message through the gate contains the
    TGUZERID kludge and it can always be copied from there.

    Very cool. I will commence with such a test shortly.


    If the gate does not know the user's telegram address
    in Fido, then a kludge to REPLAYTO will also be
    substituted, which will further facilitate writing a
    response with a netmail.

    I don't quite understand that part. Are you saying that
    your gate keeps track of a Telegram's TGUZERID (which your
    system no doubt creates and assigns) ..and if we just use
    the NAME it will look up and compare it for a matching
    (authorized) TGUZERID user?

    --
    ../|ug

    --- OpenXP 5.0.45
    * Origin: The future is not what it used to be. (2:221/1.58)
  • From August Abolins@2:221/360 to Stas Mishchenkov on Wed Aug 19 18:45:46 2020
    On 19/08/2020 6:13 a.m., Stas Mishchenkov : August Abolins wrote:

    ..and if we just use
    the NAME it will look up and compare it for a matching
    (authorized) TGUZERID user?


    Not certainly in that way. Each user has a unique ID in Telegram. Yes, the gate can match it with the username..

    OH.. @username! That's different from what I thought. I thought the system looks up the full UN LN that arrives in the REPLYADDRESS.

    Now that I created a @username for myself, I'll try it.


    --- Муж без жены - как дуб без дятла.

    "A man without a wife is like an oak tree without a woodpecker."

    HA!



    --
    Labs sākums ir puse padarīta darba.

    --- TB(Stealth)/Win7
    * Origin: nntp://rbb.fidonet.fi - Lake Ylo - Finland (2:221/360.0)
  • From August Abolins@2:221/1.58 to Tony Langdon on Sun Aug 23 13:05:00 2020
    Hello Tony!

    ** On Thursday 20.08.20 - 14:39, Tony Langdon wrote to Stas Mishchenkov:

    I think somehow the bot initated some kind of chat
    message first?

    The bot itself cannot initiate a chat.

    Interestingly, I opened a chat to the bot, and received the
    2 netmails already waiting for me! Very clever. :)

    PMFJI, but were those the test messages from me? If so, it is
    interesting that the bot "holds" the messages until the receiver
    opens the chat with it. That's not too bad!

    --
    ../|ug

    --- OpenXP 5.0.45
    * Origin: The future is not what it used to be. (2:221/1.58)
  • From Stas Mishchenkov@2:460/5858 to August Abolins on Mon Aug 24 18:57:04 2020
    Hi, August!

    23 20 13:05, August Abolins -> Tony Langdon:

    PMFJI, but were those the test messages from me? If so, it is
    interesting that the bot "holds" the messages until the receiver
    opens the chat with it. That's not too bad!

    Not certainly in that way. Messages are stored on my server and are sent after the recipient has opened the chat. In practice, they can be stored there for an unlimited time.

    Have nice nights.
    Stas Mishchenkov.

    --- 宣 ᮢ, 襣 ࠧ.
    * Origin: Lame Users Breeding. Simferopol, Crimea. (2:460/5858)