Hello Marc,
15 Feb 22 07:45, you wrote to Andrew Leary:
I have yet to see a single nomination or any other names to be
considered. Why?
There is a lot of politicking going on in the background concerning other candidates. There are attempts at building a "dream team" on the FTSC of people that certain others think would make the FTSC better but they do not have the required background needed to be on the FTSC. I decided to jump back in the ring because I care and don't have an agenda, unlike others on and off the FTSC.
What many fail to realize is that the FTSC is a group to document current standards and new technology as used by others, not a standards-creating board itself...though the FTSC seems to have a rather large backlog of proposals it has yet to vote on for some reason.
The FTSC is not the equivalent to the IEEE, ANSI, or ISO in Fidonet. It is equivalent to a secretary in a board meeting taking minutes and a minor blip on the radar of a rapidly diminishing group of people participating in an obsolete niche hobby yet some of us act like it's akin to running to be the president of the world. <G>
-- Sean
... The nice thing about standards is that there's so many to choose from.
--- GoldED+/LNX 1.1.5-b20180707
* Origin: Outpost BBS * Johnson City, TN (1:18/200)