@MSGID: 2:310/31.2@fidonet e7bcf7b0
@PID: OpenXP/5.0.45 (Win32)
@CHRS: CP437 2
@TZUTC: 0200
Hello together!
Is the charset kludge of this message as intedend like this:
CHRS: CP437 2
???
Some umlauts äöüÄÖÜ
Is the charset kludge of this message as intedend like this:
CHRS: CP437 2
???
Check.
But why CP437? CP850, Latin-1 or UTF-8 are mostly used in Western Europe.
Some umlauts ������
Looks good.
Cheers, Michiel
@CHRS: UTF-8 4
@TZUTC: 0300
On 24/08/2020 10:23 a.m., Michiel van der Vlist : Gunter Sandner wrote:
Is the charset kludge of this message as intedend like this:
CHRS: CP437 2
???
Check.
But why CP437? CP850, Latin-1 or UTF-8 are mostly used in Western Europe.
Some umlauts ������
Looks good.
But why CP437? CP850, Latin-1 or UTF-8 are mostly used in Western
Europe.
Some umlauts #ÿý#ÿý#ÿý#ÿý#ÿý#ÿý
Looks good.
Cheers, Michiel
Gunter's message arrived with CHRS: CP437 2, and the umlauts rendered perfectly here. But you quoted-reply with CHRS: CP1252 2, and that
made the umlauts unreadable. :(
Wouldn't it be best to reply with the same CHRS setting - especially
if quoting the original 8-bit characters?
Looks good.
Not at all. Michiel should have decoded correctly in 1252 if it
answered by 1252.
Sysop: | Coz |
---|---|
Location: | Anoka, MN |
Users: | 2 |
Nodes: | 4 (0 / 4) |
Uptime: | 27:09:42 |
Calls: | 97 |
Files: | 4,636 |
Messages: | 216,614 |