Nothing is happening when I run this command, it does "think" for a
while, but the old messages are still there. No errors.
================================
sqpack/w64-mvcdll 1.9 2023-02-24
================================
Tried with "*" - same thing.
================================
EchoArea FIDOSOFT.HUSKY D:\FTN\Base\Echos\fidosoft.husky -d "General discussion on Husky Software" -g E -b squish -dupecheck del
-dupehistory 14 -p 365 1:129/14
================================
Does anyone have a clue?
Nothing is happening when I run this command, it does "think" for a
while, but the old messages are still there.
No errors.
================================
D:\FTN\HPT>sqpack -c config *
sqpack/w64-mvcdll 1.9 2023-02-24
================================
If you run tparser, what does it say for that echoarea?-------
D:\FTN\Base\Echos\fidosoft.husky Squish Use AKA: 1:129/14.1DOS Style File (8+3) off (-nodosfile)
Try putting the * in quotation marks:Already tried, please read my original message.
sqpack -c config "*"
Purging enabled (option "-pack") max (-$m): 0 msgs purge (-p): 365
days dupeHistory 14
I don't know which one of these squish dates it uses :
=== Cut ===
DateWritten : 2025-05-31 15:04:34 (78915ABFh)
DateArrived : 2025-05-31 22:09:04 (B1225ABFh)
=== Cut ===
Perhaps the "DateArrived". I %rescanned from the boss, set -p 30,
but it doesn't purge.
That's a good catch! Because I rescanned the messages from my uplink
just recently, so it definitely uses the message arrival date, instead
of the written date.
This seems like a bug, should I report it on github, will anyone care there? =)
Perhaps the "DateArrived". I %rescanned from the boss, set -p 30, butThat's a good catch! Because I rescanned the messages from my uplink just recently, so it definitely uses the message arrival date, instead of the written date.
it doesn't purge.
Please test if you wish: https://www.fidonet.fi/pub/sqpack.exeThe binary became 214Kb larger, no thanks. =)
Works here so far. No warranty. ;)
Please test if you wish: https://www.fidonet.fi/pub/sqpack.exeThe binary became 214Kb larger, no thanks. =)
Works here so far. No warranty. ;)
Perhaps the "DateArrived". I %rescanned from the boss, set -p 30,That's a good catch! Because I rescanned the messages from my uplink
but it doesn't purge.
just recently, so it definitely uses the message arrival date, instead
of the written date.
This seems like a bug
The binary became 214Kb larger, no thanks. =)
--- GoldED+/W64-MSVC 1.1.5-b20250409
was saving space on an overfilled Node/BBS. What is the purpose of re-scanning? To fetch all available msg, but why? To read the "new"When you just got your node setup for the first time, there are zero messages in every area.
I can't imagine that a W64 system have a problem with 214k.This is not about the size, I suspect a trojan in there, can't be such a significant growth.
I can't imagine that a W64 system have a problem with 214k.
This is not about the size, I suspect a trojan in there, can't be such a significant growth.
Of course there is one. Or maybe two! :DI knew it. =))))
I don't know what version you are using, but it's all about compiling.I don't think that a real dated version. Which repo are you suing?
The version I compiled is : "sqpack/w32-mvc 1.9 2025-06-01".
When you just got your node setup for the first time, there are zero messages in every area.
This is the reason for rescan. It's a great feature.
I can't imagine that a W64 system have a problem with 214k.This is not about the size, I suspect a trojan in there, can't be such
a significant growth.
Sysop: | Coz |
---|---|
Location: | Anoka, MN |
Users: | 2 |
Nodes: | 4 (0 / 4) |
Uptime: | 03:38:00 |
Calls: | 332 |
Files: | 5,903 |
Messages: | 231,321 |