1) There is no node 1:3603/9999 in the nodelist.
2) There isn't even a net 3603.
3) Real names are tradition in Fidonet.
So, who are you?
Very interesting. I do know he's a troll who recently crawled out from under a rock in Dove-Net. Looks like he's impersonating a Fido node,
can anyone see the "via" lines of his messages and know what hub is
being exploited?
So my guess would be: mister Vague is David Duff...
sounds like he just needs to go back over his configuration and fix the FTN
addresses in his fidonet areas, then... a simple thing to fix, really... certainly nothing worth flamage and heavy bombardment...
out fr1) There is no node 1:3603/9999 in the nodelist.
2) There isn't even a net 3603.
3) Real names are tradition in Fidonet.
So, who are you?
Very interesting. I do know he's a troll who recently crawled
under a rock in Dove-Net. Looks like he's impersonating a Fidonode,
can anyone see the "via" lines of his messages and know what hubis
being exploited?
I do not buy into the idea or notion that this occurred because of a misconfiguration or a miscommunication error, not at all, this was very deliberate.
There should be consequence's for such action & behavior.
Exploitation was his goal at every angle, his handle - Vauge.
I also went to the nodelist, I found nothing.
Could it be that these massages were gated to the newsgroups and then
back into Fidonet.
Policy 4 rules Fidonet, but is there a provision within policy to
account for what Mr. Duff was able to pull off
and additionally would he or could he be held accountable for a explanation of his previous antics?
Now that Mr. Duff has a fully fledged node in Fidonet wouldn't it seem logical and appropriate to reach out to his NC to see if they could shed any light as to what happened?
I do not buy into the idea or notion that this occurred because of a misconfiguration or a miscommunication error, not at all, this was very deliberate. There should be consequence's for such action & behavior.
I do not buy into the idea or notion that this occurred because of a misconfiguration or a miscommunication error, not at all, this was very deliberate. There should be consequence's for such action & behavior.
Exploitation was his goal at every angle, his handle - Vauge.
Now that Mr. Duff has a fully fledged node in Fidonet wouldn't it seem logical and appropriate to reach out to his NC to see if they could shed any light as to what happened?
Host,135,Sunshine_State_Net,Gainesville_FL,Eric_Renfro
I think he fixed whatever the problem was.
Then the matter is closed, to spite how annoying he has been in the past.
whether or not real names are required in this echo remains to be seen... the moderator has not spoken about it nor have they posted any rules for this area in years...
Hello Greg,
Re: Re: Who are you?
By: Gregory Deyss to Wilfred van Velzen on Sat Feb 27 2021 10:26:5
of a misconfiguration or a miscommunication error, not at all, thisI do not buy into the idea or notion that this occurred because
action & behavior.was very deliberate. There should be consequence's for such
ththe
i can tell you, without a doubt, that the erroneous FTN address in
origin line was a misconfiguration... he had set up originally withit
(via a configuration script) to rejoin fidonet he was hoping torejoin
the same net he had been in previously but that is not possible
anymore...
he was not aware that the address had been written to each of
his fidonet message areas' settings... it was not "deliberate" as in
was not trying to cause problems... once it was pointed out and he w
able to investigate his fidonet areas' settings, he was quite able t
fix the problem with the erroneous address in the origin line...
Good enough for me, I was merely acting upon emotional judgment as we bit of suspicion based on how he was with me in one particular echo.
You are clearly delusional.
When he referred to me as King of Fidonet here in New York
Lemme tell you something, bub.
There is only one King of Fidonet around here.
And that ain't you. Wanna know why? Because Ross Cassell
claimed it first. And not a single sysop challenged him.
Furthermore, Ross Cassell has never relinquished his title.
He grabbed it, nobody challenged him, or even dares to.
Of course, he earned it. And everybody knew it.
As such, he did truly deserve the title.
If you are jealous, and feel you are more deserving than
Ross Cassell to be King of Fidonet, then there is only one
way to resolve this problem. You must challenge Ross Cassell
to a live duel on Facebook for the King of Fidonet title, as
he has already defeated every sysop in Fidonet. Or do like
all the other sysops did - live to another day by wimping
out.
The choice is up to you.
and then there also was use of the term Fidogod by him as well.
The Fidogods of Fidonet are a myth. As long as nobody tells Odin.
I told him I was neither of these.
Fidolord Greg of New York has a much more personal touch.
I like it.
Lee Lofaso wrote to Gregory Deyss <=-
Every sysop is lord and master of his/her own system.
As well as his/her own universe.
I forget who it was that compared the telephone network to
the internet by saying that the telephone network was a
smart network with dumb endpoints, and the internet was a
dumb network with smart endpoints. It seemed like a sound
analogy.
Sysop: | Coz |
---|---|
Location: | Anoka, MN |
Users: | 2 |
Nodes: | 4 (0 / 4) |
Uptime: | 32:29:44 |
Calls: | 141 |
Files: | 5,058 |
Messages: | 220,694 |