• Are scientists being fooled by bacteria?

    From ScienceDaily@1:317/3 to All on Thu Feb 3 21:30:44 2022
    Are scientists being fooled by bacteria?
    Previous studies of a genetic on/off switch may have been confounded by contamination

    Date:
    February 3, 2022
    Source:
    The Mount Sinai Hospital / Mount Sinai School of Medicine
    Summary:
    Researchers created a tailor-made gene sequencing method to
    accurately measure a biochemical, DNA tagging system, which
    switches genes on or off. This helped them study the system in any
    cell type, including human, plant and bacterial cells. While the
    results supported the idea that this system may occur naturally in
    non-bacterial cells, the levels were much lower than some previous
    studies reported and were easily skewed by bacterial contamination
    or current experimental methods. Experiments on human brain cancer
    cells produced similar results.



    FULL STORY ==========================================================================
    For decades, a small group of cutting-edge medical researchers have
    been studying a biochemical, DNA tagging system, which switches genes
    on or off.

    Many have studied it in bacteria and now some have seen signs of it in,
    plants, flies, and even human brain tumors. However, according to a new
    study by researchers at the Icahn School of Medicine at Mount Sinai,
    there may be a hitch: much of the evidence of its presence in higher
    organisms may be due to bacterial contamination, which was difficult to
    spot using current experimental methods.


    ==========================================================================
    To address this, the scientists created a tailor-made gene sequencing
    method which relies on a new machine learning algorithm to accurately
    measure the source and levels of tagged DNA. This helped them distinguish bacterial DNA from that of human and other non-bacterial cells. While
    the results published in Science supported the idea that this system
    may occur naturally in non- bacterial cells, the levels were much lower
    than some previous studies reported and were easily skewed by bacterial contamination or current experimental methods. Experiments on human
    brain cancer cells produced similar results.

    "Pushing the boundaries of medical research can be challenging. Sometimes
    the ideas are so novel that we have to rethink the experimental methods
    we use to test them out," said Gang Fang, PhD, Associate Professor of
    Genetics and Genomic Sciences at Icahn Mount Sinai. "In this study,
    we developed a new method for effectively measuring this DNA mark
    in a wide variety of species and cell types. We hope this will help
    scientists uncover the many roles these processes may play in evolution
    and human disease." The study focused on DNA adenine methylation, a biochemical reaction which attaches a chemical, called a methyl group,
    to an adenine, one of the four building block molecules used to construct lengthy DNA strands and encode genes. This can "epigenetically" activate
    or silence genes without actually altering DNA sequences. For instance,
    it is known that adenine methylation plays a critical role in how some
    bacteria defend themselves against viruses.

    For decades, scientists thought that adenine methylation strictly happened
    in bacteria whereas human and other non-bacterial cells relied on the methylation of a different building block -- cytosine -- to regulate
    genes. Then, starting around 2015, this view changed. Scientists spotted
    high levels of adenine methylation in plant, fly, mouse, and human cells, suggesting a wider role for the reaction throughout evolution.

    However, the scientists who performed these initial experiments faced
    difficult trade-offs. Some used techniques that can precisely measure
    adenine methylation levels from any cell type but do not have the capacity
    to identify which cell each piece of DNA came from, while others relied
    on methods that can spot methylation in different cell types but may overestimate reaction levels.



    ==========================================================================
    In this study, Dr. Fang's team developed a method called 6mASCOPE which overcomes these trade-offs. In it, DNA is extracted from a sample of
    tissue or cells and chopped up into short strands by proteins called
    enzymes. The strands are placed into microscopic wells and treated with
    enzymes that make new copies of each strand. An advanced sequencing
    machine then measures in real time the rate at which each nucleotide
    building block is added to a new strand.

    Methylated adenines slightly delay this process. The results are then
    fed into a machine learning algorithm which the researchers trained to
    estimate methylation levels from the sequencing data.

    "The DNA sequences allowed us to identify which cells -- human or
    bacterial - - methylation occurred in while the machine learning model quantified the levels of methylation in each species separately,"
    said Dr. Fang, Initial experiments on simple, single-cell organisms,
    such as green algae, suggested that the 6mASCOPE method was effective
    in that it could detect differences between two organisms that both had
    high levels of adenine methylation.

    The method also appeared to be effective at quantifying adenine
    methylation in complex organisms. For example, previous studies had
    suggested that high levels of methylation may play a role in the early
    growth of the fruit fly Drosophila melanogaster and of the flowering weed Arabidopsis thaliana. In this study, the researchers found that these high levels of methylation were mostly the result of contaminating bacterial
    DNA. In reality, the fly and the plant DNA from these experiments only
    had trace amounts of methylation.

    Likewise, experiments on human cells suggested that methylation occurs at
    very low levels in both healthy and disease conditions. Immune cell DNA obtained from patient blood samples had only trace amounts of methylation.

    Similar results were also seen with DNA isolated from glioblastoma
    brain tumor samples. This result was different than a previous study,
    which reported much higher levels of adenine methylation in tumor
    cells. However, as the authors note, more research may be needed to
    determine how much of this discrepancy may be due to differences in
    tumor subtypes as well as other potential sources of methylation.

    Finally, the researchers found that plasmid DNA, a tool that scientists
    use regularly to manipulate genes, may be contaminated with high levels
    of methylation that originated from bacteria, suggesting this DNA could
    be a source of contamination in future experiments.

    "Our results show that the manner in which adenine methylation is
    measured can have profound effects on the result of an experiment. We
    do not mean to exclude the possibility that some human tissues or
    disease subtypes may have highly abundant DNA adenine methylation, but
    we do hope 6mASCOPE will help scientists fully investigate this issue by excluding the bias from bacterial contamination," said Dr. Gang. "To help
    with this we have made the 6mASCOPE analysis software and a detailed
    operating manual widely available to other researchers." This work
    was supported by the National Institutes of Health (GM139655, HG011095, AG071291); the Icahn Institute for Genomics and Multiscale Biology; the
    Irma T. Hirschl/Monique Weill-Caulier Trust; the Nash Family Foundation;
    and the Department of Scientific Computing at the Icahn School of Medicine
    at Mount Sinai. Methods validation using Mass Spectrometry was supported
    by the collaborators at the Chinese Academy of Sciences (XDPB2004)
    and the National Natural Science Foundation of China (22021003).

    special promotion Explore the latest scientific research on sleep and
    dreams in this free online course from New Scientist -- Sign_up_now_>>> ========================================================================== Story Source: Materials provided by The_Mount_Sinai_Hospital_/_Mount_Sinai_School_of Medicine. Note: Content
    may be edited for style and length.


    ========================================================================== Journal Reference:
    1. Yimeng Kong, Lei Cao, Gintaras Deikus, Yu Fan, Edward A. Mead,
    Weiyi Lai,
    Yizhou Zhang, Raymund Yong, Robert Sebra, Hailin Wang, Xue-Song
    Zhang, Gang Fang. Critical assessment of DNA adenine methylation
    in eukaryotes using quantitative deconvolution. Science, 2022;
    375 (6580): 515 DOI: 10.1126/science.abe7489 ==========================================================================

    Link to news story: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2022/02/220203160551.htm

    --- up 8 weeks, 5 days, 7 hours, 13 minutes
    * Origin: -=> Castle Rock BBS <=- Now Husky HPT Powered! (1:317/3)