• Handwriting beats typing and watching vi

    From ScienceDaily@1:317/3 to All on Thu Jul 8 21:30:32 2021
    Handwriting beats typing and watching videos for learning to read

    Date:
    July 8, 2021
    Source:
    Johns Hopkins University
    Summary:
    Though writing by hand is increasingly being eclipsed by the ease
    of computers, a new study finds we shouldn't be so quick to throw
    away the pencils and paper: handwriting helps people learn certain
    skills surprisingly faster and significantly better than learning
    the same material through typing or watching videos.



    FULL STORY ========================================================================== Though writing by hand is increasingly being eclipsed by the ease of
    computers, a new study finds we shouldn't be so quick to throw away
    the pencils and paper: handwriting helps people learn certain skills surprisingly faster and significantly better than learning the same
    material through typing or watching videos.


    ==========================================================================
    "The question out there for parents and educators is why should our
    kids spend any time doing handwriting," says senior author Brenda Rapp,
    a Johns Hopkins University professor of cognitive science. "Obviously,
    you're going to be a better hand-writer if you practice it. But since
    people are handwriting less then maybe who cares? The real question is:
    Are there other benefits to handwriting that have to do with reading
    and spelling and understanding? We find there most definitely are."
    The work appears in the journal Psychological Science.

    Rapp and lead author Robert Wiley, a former Johns Hopkins University Ph.D.

    student who is now a professor at the University of North Carolina,
    Greensboro, conducted an experiment in which 42 people were taught the
    Arabic alphabet, split into three groups of learners: writers, typers
    and video watchers.

    Everyone learned the letters one at a time by watching videos of them
    being written along with hearing names and sounds. After being introduced
    to each letter, the three groups would attempt to learn what they just saw
    and heard in different ways. The video group got an on-screen flash of
    a letter and had to say if it was the same letter they'd just seen. The
    typers would have to find the letter on the keyboard. The writers had
    to copy the letter with pen and paper.

    At the end, after as many as six sessions, everyone could recognize the
    letters and made few mistakes when tested. But the writing group reached
    this level of proficiency faster than the other groups -- a few of them
    in just two sessions.



    ==========================================================================
    Next the researchers wanted to determine to what extent, if at all, the
    groups could generalize this new knowledge. In other words, they could
    all recognize the letters, but could anyone really use them like a pro,
    by writing with them, using them to spell new words and using them to
    read unfamiliar words? The writing group was better -- decisively --
    in all of those things.

    "The main lesson is that even though they were all good at recognizing
    letters, the writing training was the best at every other measure. And
    they required less time to get there," Wiley said.

    The writing group ended up with more of the skills needed for expert
    adult- level reading and spelling. Wiley and Rapp say it's because
    handwriting reinforces the visual and aural lessons. The advantage has
    nothing to do with penmanship -- it's that the simple act of writing by
    hand provides a perceptual-motor experience that unifies what is being
    learned about the letters (their shapes, their sounds, and their motor
    plans), which in turn creates richer knowledge and fuller, true learning,
    the team says.

    "With writing, you're getting a stronger representation in your mind
    that lets you scaffold toward these other types of tasks that don't in
    any way involve handwriting," Wiley said.



    ========================================================================== Although the participants in the study were adults, Wiley and Rapp expect they'd see the same results in children. The findings have implications
    for classrooms, where pencils and notebooks have taken a backseat in
    recent years to tablets and laptops, and teaching cursive handwriting
    is all but extinct.

    The findings also suggest that adults trying to learn a language with a different alphabet should supplement what they're learning through apps
    or tapes with good old-fashioned paperwork.

    Wiley, for one, is making sure the kids in his life are stocked up on
    writing supplies.

    "I have three nieces and a nephew right now and my siblings ask me should
    we get them crayons and pens? I say yes, let them just play with the
    letters and start writing them and write them all the time. I bought
    them all finger paint for Christmas and told them let's do letters."
    The work was supported by the Science of Learning Institute at Johns
    Hopkins University, and the Dingwall Foundation Dissertation Fellowship
    in the Cognitive, Clinical, and Neural Foundations of Language.

    ========================================================================== Story Source: Materials provided by Johns_Hopkins_University. Note:
    Content may be edited for style and length.


    ========================================================================== Journal Reference:
    1. Robert W. Wiley, Brenda Rapp. The Effects of Handwriting
    Experience on
    Literacy Learning. Psychological Science, 2021; 095679762199311
    DOI: 10.1177/0956797621993111 ==========================================================================

    Link to news story: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2021/07/210708111508.htm

    --- up 8 weeks, 6 days, 22 hours, 45 minutes
    * Origin: -=> Castle Rock BBS <=- Now Husky HPT Powered! (1:317/3)