• Can reactor fuel debris be safely remove

    From ScienceDaily@1:317/3 to All on Tue Jan 25 21:30:44 2022
    Can reactor fuel debris be safely removed from Fukushima Daiichi?

    Date:
    January 25, 2022
    Source:
    University of Helsinki
    Summary:
    Decommissioning and clean-up are ongoing at the Fukushima Daiichi
    Nuclear Power Plant (FDNPP); however, many difficult problems
    remain unaddressed.

    Chief amongst these problems is the retrieval and management of
    fuel debris.



    FULL STORY ========================================================================== Decommissioning and clean-up are ongoing at the Fukushima Daiichi
    Nuclear Power Plant (FDNPP); however, many difficult problems remain unaddressed. Chief amongst these problems is the retrieval and management
    of fuel debris. Fuel debris is the name given to the solidified mixture
    of melted nuclear fuel and other materials that now lie at the base of
    each of the damaged reactors (reactor Units 1 -- 3). This material is
    highly radioactive and it has potential to generate enough neutrons to
    trigger successive nuclear fission reactions (uranium-235 breaks into two elements after capturing neutrons, emitting enormous amounts of energy, radiation, and more neutrons). Successive fission reactions would present
    a serious safety and material management risk.


    ==========================================================================
    One of the materials in nuclear reactors that can lower the number of
    neutrons interacting with uranium-235 is boron carbide (B4C). This was
    used as the control rod material in the FDNPP reactors, and it may now
    remain within the fuel debris. If so, it may limit fission events within
    the fuel debris.

    Can the fuel debris be safely removed? On March 11th 2011, the control
    rods were inserted into the FDNPP reactors to stop the fission reactions immediately after the earthquake, but the later tsunami destroyed the
    reactor cooling systems. Fuel temperatures soon became high enough (>2000
    DEGC) to cause reactor meltdowns. Currently, the fuel debris material
    from each reactor is cooled and stable; however, careful assessment of
    these materials, including not only their inventories of radioactive
    elements but as well their boron content, a neutron absorber, is needed
    to ascertain if successive fission reactions and associated neutron
    flux could occur in the fuel debris during its removal. Many important questions remain: was boron from the control rods lost at high temperature during the meltdown? If so, does enough boron remain in the fuel debris to limit successive fission reactions within this material? These questions
    must be answered to support safe decommissioning.

    Study shows direct evidence of volatilization of control rods during
    the accident.

    Despite the importance of this topic, the state and stability of the
    FDNPP control rod material has remained unknown until now. However,
    work just published in the Journal of Hazardous Materials now provides
    vital evidence that indicates that most of the control rod boron remains
    in at least two of the damaged FDNPP reactors (Units 2 and/or 3).

    The study was an international effort involving scientists from Japan,
    Finland, France, and the USA. Dr. Satoshi Utsunomiya and graduate student Kazuki Fueda of Kyushu University led the study. Using electron microscopy
    and secondary ion mass spectrometry (SIMS), the team has been able to
    report the first-ever measurements of boron and lithium chemistry from radioactive Cs-rich microparticles (CsMPs). CsMPs formed inside FDNPP
    reactor units 2 and/or 3 during the meltdowns. These microscopic particles
    were then emitted into the environment, and the particles hold vital
    clues about the extent and types of meltdown processes. The team's new
    results on boron-11/boron-10 isotopic ratios (~4.2) clearly indicate that
    most of the boron inside the CsMPs is derived from the FDNPP control rods
    and not from other sources (e.g., boron from the seawater that was used
    to cool the reactors). Dr Utsunomiya states that the presence of boron
    in the CsMPs "provides direct evidence of volatilization of the control
    rods, indicating that they were severely damaged during the meltdowns."
    Ample boron likely remains in the reactors, but more research is needed
    In the study the team also combined their new data with past knowledge
    on CsMP emissions. From this, they have been able to estimate the total
    amount of boron released from the FDNPP reactors was likely very small: 0.024-62 g.

    Prof. Gareth Law, a co-author from the University of Helsinki emphasized
    that this "is a tiny fraction of the reactor's overall boron inventory,
    and this may mean that essentially all of the control rod boron remains
    inside the reactors." The team hopes that this should prevent excessive
    fission reactions in the fuel debris. Utsunomiya stresses that "FDNPP decommissioning, and specifically fuel debris removal must be planned so
    that the extensive fission reactions do not occur. Our international team
    has successfully provided the first direct evidence of volatilization of
    B4C during the FDNPP meltdowns, but critically, our new data indicated
    that large quantities of boron, which adsorbs neutrons, likely remains
    within the fuel debris." Prof. Rod Ewing, a co-author from Stanford
    University acknowledged the importance of these new findings but
    highlighted that the team's measurements now need to be "extended
    in follow-up studies, where the occurrence and distribution of boron
    species should be characterized across a wide range of debris fragments."
    Prof. emeritus Bernd Grambow, a study co-author from SUBATECH, Nantes, France,highlights that the work "paves the way for improving the safety assessment of debris retrieval during decommissioning at FDNPP," with the team's methods "providing a template for further studies." Utsunomiya
    concludes that "it is nearly 11 years since the FDNPP disaster. In
    addition to tireless efforts from engineers at the FDNPP, scientific contributions are becoming more and more important as tools to address
    the major difficulties that will be faced during decommissioning." ========================================================================== Story Source: Materials provided by University_of_Helsinki. Note:
    Content may be edited for style and length.


    ========================================================================== Journal Reference:
    1. Kazuki Fueda, Ryu Takami, Kenta Minomo, Kazuya Morooka, Kenji
    Horie, Mami
    Takehara, Shinya Yamasaki, Takumi Saito, Hiroyuki Shiotsu,
    Toshihiko Ohnuki, Gareth T.W. Law, Bernd Grambow, Rodney C. Ewing,
    Satoshi Utsunomiya. Volatilization of B4C control rods in Fukushima
    Daiichi nuclear reactors during meltdown: B-Li isotopic signatures
    in cesium-rich microparticles. Journal of Hazardous Materials,
    2022; 428: 128214 DOI: 10.1016/j.jhazmat.2022.128214 ==========================================================================

    Link to news story: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2022/01/220125093041.htm

    --- up 7 weeks, 3 days, 7 hours, 13 minutes
    * Origin: -=> Castle Rock BBS <=- Now Husky HPT Powered! (1:317/3)