Gossip influences who gets ahead in different cultures

Date:
April 11, 2023
Source:
Washington State University
Summary:
Gossip influences if people receive advantages whether they
work in an office in the U.S. or in India -- or even in a remote
village in Africa, a new study found. In a set of experiments,
anthropologists found that positive and negative gossip influenced
whether participants were willing to give a person a resource,
such as a raise or a family heirloom, especially when the gossip
was specific to the circumstance.


Facebook Twitter Pinterest LinkedIN Email
FULL STORY ========================================================================== Gossip influences if people receive advantages whether they work in an
office in the U.S. or in India -- or even in a remote village in Africa,
a Washington State University study found.


==========================================================================
In a set of experiments, WSU anthropologists found that positive and
negative gossip influenced whether participants were willing to give
a person a resource, such as a raise or a family heirloom, especially
when the gossip was specific to the circumstance. For instance, positive
gossip concerning job- related behavior, such as saying the person worked
well under pressure, increased the participants' willingness to give a work-related benefit compared to gossip about family relationships.

The researchers ran the experiment with 120 online participants workers
in the U.S. and India, and after making some culturally appropriate adjustments, with 160 Ngandu horticulturalists, who make a living from
small gardens in the Central African Republic. In all three groups,
they found similar results.

"Gossip seems context relevant. People don't just say random things," said Nicole Hess, a WSU anthropologist and lead author on the study published
in the journal Evolution and Human Behavior. "Gossip that was relevant
to the exchange and the relationship had the most impact on whether
a person gave a resource, or not." Anthropologists consider gossip,
defined as exchanging reputational information about other community
members, to be a feature of almost every human society, but it is less
clear what function it serves. Some argue that talking about other
people this way helps enforce social norms or serves as social bonding
between the gossipers. This study lends evidence to yet another theory:
that gossip is used competitively because it shows a direct relationship between gossip and the likelihood of receiving more resources.

"Up until this study, no one had even really asked 'what is the end
result of gossip?' Gossip makes a person's reputation worse or better, so
what is the result?" Hess said. "These findings support the competitive evolutionary model: that people are using gossip to compete with each
other over valuable resources in their communities." For this study,
Hess and co-author Ed Hagen, also a WSU anthropologist, developed a set
of experiments that provided participants with job- or family- related scenarios. For the office workers in the industrialized countries, the scenarios described a situation where they could either give a raise to
one of their co-workers or an inherited painting to a family member.

They then were given a mix of gossip statements about how a theoretical
co- worker or relative behaved at work or dealt with their family. For
example, the work statement might be about whether the colleague was
willing to work late to finish a project, or on the family side, whether
they got along well with their siblings.

After reading a mix of these statements, the participants were asked
whether they were willing to give that fictional person the resource.

For the Ngandu farmers, the work scenario was adjusted to have them
evaluate a fictional worker they hired to help with their garden, and
whether they would share some shirts with the worker that a produce
buyer had given them. The family scenario involved deciding whether to
give a relative some nice clothes the participant had inherited.

Both surveys showed a similar pattern: participants were more willing to
give the resource when exposed to more positive, context-specific gossip statements about them, and less willing when exposed to more negative, context-specific gossip statements.

In this paper, the researchers also included an observational study of
40 Aka hunter-gatherers who live near the Ngandu horticulturists. This
study was designed as a series of questions asked verbally about real
people the participants knew, which increased the study's ecological
validity, meaning it shows that the results can be generalized to
real-life settings.

While not exactly parallel with the experimental studies, these
observational results also indicated that an individual's positive
reputation strongly influenced whether the Aka participants were willing
to share a resource with them.

"The cultural contexts are different, but they have the same patterns
of responses," said Hess. "This appears to be the universal psychology
in how people evaluate reputation in allocating valuable things from
industrial societies to small scale communities."
* RELATED_TOPICS
o Mind_&_Brain
# Social_Psychology # Stress # Relationships # Psychology
o Science_&_Society
# Industrial_Relations # Education_and_Employment #
Resource_Shortage # Disaster_Plan
* RELATED_TERMS
o Experimental_economics o Anchoring_bias_in_decision-making
o Placebo_effect o Workaholic o Charisma o Social_psychology
o Privacy o Self-esteem

========================================================================== Story Source: Materials provided by Washington_State_University. Original written by Sara Zaske. Note: Content may be edited for style and length.


========================================================================== Journal Reference:
1. Nicole H. Hess, Edward H. Hagen. The impact of gossip, reputation,
and
context on resource transfers among Aka hunter-gatherers, Ngandu
horticulturalists, and MTurkers. Evolution and Human Behavior,
2023; DOI: 10.1016/j.evolhumbehav.2023.02.013 ==========================================================================

Link to news story: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2023/04/230411105900.htm

--- up 1 year, 6 weeks, 1 day, 10 hours, 50 minutes
* Origin: -=> Castle Rock BBS <=- Now Husky HPT Powered! (1:317/3)