Few countries offer a good place to die, researchers say
Good health resources help, but only when used the right way

Date:
January 19, 2022
Source:
Duke University
Summary:
COVID-19 has shown us images of patients dying in isolation,
apart from loved ones during their final moments. But even before
the pandemic, harrowing deaths were all too common in most parts
of the world, a new survey of end-of-life care shows. The study
ranked 81 countries on how well their health systems provide
for the physical and mental wellbeing of patients at the end of
life. Only six countries earned an A grade.



FULL STORY ========================================================================== Among the most troubling scenes from the COVID-19 era are the images of patients dying in isolation, unable to be with loved ones during their
final moments. But even before the pandemic, harrowing deaths were all too common in most parts of the world, a new survey of end-of-life care shows.


==========================================================================
The study, detailed in three papers to be published in the Journal
of Pain and Symptom Management, ranked 81 countries on how well their
health systems provide for the physical and mental wellbeing of patients
at the end of life.

Only six countries earned grades of A, while 36 earned Ds or Fs.

The survey results appeared in the Journal of Pain and Symptom
Managementlast month, and additional details may be found on a website
created by the Lien Centre for Palliative Care, part of the Duke-NUS
Medical School in Singapore.

"Society should also be judged on how well people die," says Eric
Finkelstein, a palliative care expert and professor with Duke-NUS
and the Duke Global Health Institute in Durham, North Carolina, who
led the study. "Many individuals in both the developed and developing
world die very badly -- not at their place of choice, without dignity,
or compassion, with a limited understanding about their illness, after
spending down much of their savings, and often with regret about their
course of treatment. These things are very common." To compile the
rankings, Finkelstein and colleagues surveyed more than 1,200 caregivers
from several countries to identify what is most important to patients at
the end of life. They then asked 181 palliative care experts across the
globe to grade their countries' health systems on 13 weighted factors that people most often listed, including proper management of pain and comfort, having a clean and safe space, being treated kindly, and treatments that address quality of life, rather than merely extending life.

The United Kingdom earned the highest ranking in the study, followed by Ireland, Taiwan, Australia, South Korea and Costa Rica, which all earned
A grades. The United States earned a C, ranking 43rd of the 81 countries.



==========================================================================
At the bottom of the rankings were 20 countries earning failing grades,
many of which are low- or middle-income countries with fewer health
resources than the top-rated countries.

"Perhaps the main conclusion from this important exercise is that most
people in the world die badly -- many through no treatment at all and many through excessive often futile treatment that increases suffering," says Richard Smith, a palliative care expert and former editor of the British Medical Journal. He and Finkelstein also serve on the Lancet Commission
on the Value of Death, a global panel of palliative care experts who are expected to issue recommendations for improving end-of-life care later
this year.

It's no coincidence that most of the survey's top scorers are wealthy
countries with well-funded health systems, while low- and middle-income countries fared worse, says Stephen Connor, executive director of
the Worldwide Hospice Palliative Care Alliance and one of the study's co-authors. "The overwhelming need for palliative care is in low and middle-income countries, where less than a third of services exist,"
he notes.

But Connor and Finkelstein both point to the U.S.' middling ranking
as proof that money doesn't always guarantee attention to end-of-life
care. In the U.S., he says, resources are often invested in last-ditch
efforts to extend life, rather than measures to ensure comfort and
quality of life in a patient's final days.

"We spend so much money trying to get people to live longer, but we don't
spend enough money in helping people die better," says Finkelstein, who is
also the director of the Lien Centre for Palliative Care at Duke-NUS. The research was funded by the Lien Foundation, a Singapore-based nonprofit
focused on improving quality of life.



==========================================================================
The harrowing stories of COVID-19 deaths, when health care workers were
often the only people allowed to comfort the dying, should bring renewed
focus on end-of-life care, Finkelstein says.

"Generally, people don't talk about death. COVID has made it less
taboo. We have an opportunity to continue this discussion and not just
help COVID patients, but to help everyone have a better end-of-life experience," he said.

Finkelstein and colleagues hope the country rankings spur action from policymakers to improve conditions for dying patients, such as loosening restrictions on pain medications given to comfort those at the end
of life.

But people don't necessarily need to wait for policy change to take steps
to ensure a better end-of-life experience, Finkelstein says. He advises
people of any age or health condition to make an end of life plan and
discuss it with family and friends.

"Do an advanced care plan or at least express your wishes to friends
and family," he says. "Don't wait. By the time you fall ill, it may be
too late and folks may not know what you want." special promotion
Explore the latest scientific research on sleep and dreams in
this free online course from New Scientist -- Sign_up_now_>>> academy.newscientist.com/courses/science-of-sleep-and-dreams ========================================================================== Story Source: Materials provided by Duke_University. Note: Content may
be edited for style and length.


========================================================================== Journal References:
1. Afsan Bhadelia, Leslie E. Oldfield, Jennifer L. Cruz, Ratna
Singh, Eric
A. Finkelstein. Identifying core domains to assess the `quality of
death':A scoping review. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management,
2021; DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.11.015
2. Juan Marcos Gonzalez Sepulveda, Drishti Baid, F. Reed Johnson,
Eric A.

Finkelstein. What is a good death? A choice experiment on care
indicators for patients at end of life.. Journal of Pain and
Symptom Management, 2021; DOI: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.11.005
3. Eric A. Finkelstein, Afsan Bhadelia, Cynthia Goh, Drishti Baid,
Ratna
Singh, Sushma Bhatnagar, Stephen R. Connor. Cross Country
Comparison of Expert Assessments of the Quality of Death and
Dying 2021. Journal of Pain and Symptom Management, 2021; DOI:
10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2021.12.015 ==========================================================================

Link to news story: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2022/01/220118145930.htm

--- up 6 weeks, 4 days, 7 hours, 13 minutes
* Origin: -=> Castle Rock BBS <=- Now Husky HPT Powered! (1:317/3)