• City trees and soil are sucking more car

    From ScienceDaily@1:317/3 to All on Wed Feb 16 21:30:52 2022
    City trees and soil are sucking more carbon out of the atmosphere than previously thought

    Date:
    February 16, 2022
    Source:
    Boston University
    Summary:
    Research uncovers new information about the role that forest edges
    play in buffering global impacts of climate change and urbanization.



    FULL STORY ==========================================================================
    They may not have lungs like we do, but the soil and trees are breathing
    in and out all of the time. Trees take in carbon dioxide (CO2), release
    oxygen by way of photosynthesis, and store carbon in their trunks. And
    when the leaves land on the ground, soil microbes work to decompose the
    leaves and other organic matter, which releases carbon dioxide.


    ========================================================================== Forests actually store more carbon dioxide than they release, which is
    great news for us: about 30 percent of carbon emissions from burning
    fossil fuels are taken in by forests, an effect called the terrestrial
    carbon sink.

    "That's CO2 that's not in the atmosphere," says Boston University
    biogeochemist and ecologist Lucy Hutyra. "We're not feeling the full
    effects of climate change because of the terrestrial climate sink. These forests are doing an incredible service to our planet." For more than
    a decade, Hutyra has been investigating what happens to the planet's
    "lungs" when large forests are cut down into smaller patches, a process researchers call forest fragmentation.

    "We think about forests as big landscapes, but really they are chopped up
    into all these little segments because of the human world," says Hutyra, a
    BU College of Arts & Sciences professor of Earth and environment. Forests
    get cut into smaller parcels, as chunks are taken down to make space for
    roads, buildings, agriculture, and solar farms -- one of the biggest
    drivers of forest loss in Massachusetts. These alterations to forests
    create more areas called forest edges -- literally, the trees at the
    outermost edge of a forest.

    It has long been assumed that these forest edges release and store carbon
    at similar rates as forest interiors, but Hutyra and researchers in her
    lab at BU have discovered this isn't true. Soils and trees in temperate
    forest edges in the Northeast United States are acting differently
    than those farther away from people. In two recent research papers,
    Hutyra's team found edge trees grow faster than their country cousins
    deep in the forest, and that soil in urban areas can hoard more carbon
    dioxide than previously thought. Their results can challenge current
    ideas about conservation and the value of urban forests as more than
    places for recreation.



    ========================================================================== Breathing In CO2 In one of the most detailed looks at temperate forest
    edges to date, Hutyra and her research team, including collaborators at
    the Harvard Forest, examined the growth rates of edge trees compared to
    the rest of the forest.

    Using data from the US Department of Agriculture's Forest Inventory
    and Analysis program -- which monitors tree size, growth, and land use
    across the country -- Hutyra's team looked at more than 48,000 forest
    plots in the Northeast United States. They found trees on the edges grow
    nearly twice as fast as interior trees -- those roughly 100 feet away
    from the edge.

    "This is likely because the trees on the edge don't have competition
    with interior forest, so they get more light," says Luca Morreale, a
    PhD candidate in Hutyra's lab and lead author on the paper, published in
    Nature Communications, outlining the findings. And the more a tree grows,
    the more carbon it is taking in.

    This is good news, considering over 25 percent of the landscape in the Northeast United States is covered by an edge. But this doesn't mean that
    more forest fragmentation is a solution for sucking more carbon out of
    the atmosphere; carbon storage along the edges of fragmented areas does
    not come close to offsetting the negative side effects of losing forests
    -- like releasing carbon long stored underground back into the atmosphere.



    ========================================================================== According to Morreale and Hutyra, their study instead points to the
    need to better understand and conserve existing forest edges, which
    are typically seen as more disposable. "We are underestimating how much
    carbon is being taken up by temperate forest edges," Hutyra says. "We
    also need to think about how susceptible they might be in the future to
    climate change," because previous studies have shown that even though
    these trees are growing faster from more sunlight, hotter temperatures
    cause growth rates of edge trees to plummet.

    Breathing Out CO2 In a second related study, Hutyra teamed up with BU
    biologist Pamela Templer to find that soils at the forest edge felt the
    effects of forest fragmentation, just like the trees.

    "Soils contain wild amounts of bacteria, fungi, roots, and microorganisms,
    and just the way we breathe out CO2 when working and being active, they
    respire CO2, as well," says Sarah Garvey, a PhD candidate in Hutyra's
    lab and lead author of a paper on forest edge soils published in Global
    Change Biology."With soil, there is more there than meets the eye."
    Garvey found that not only does forest edge soil release more carbon
    than interior forest soil, but that the soil is acting dramatically
    differently in rural and urban forests.

    She visited eight field sites in developed and undeveloped areas of Massachusetts every two weeks for a year and a half (skipping the winter,
    when the ground is covered in ice) to measure the levels of carbon
    being released from the soils. She and her team would take a snapshot
    of the temperature and moisture levels of the soil at the forest edge,
    and then walk about 300 feet into the forest to take measurements again.

    They saw that in rural areas with fewer people and buildings, warmer temperatures at the edge of the forest caused leaves and organic matter
    to decompose faster, forcing the soil microorganisms to work harder and
    release more carbon dioxide than their cooler, more shaded peers in the
    forest interior. But, in urban forests, where the ground was significantly hotter and drier, those soils stopped releasing as much carbon.

    "It's so hot and dry that the microbes are not happy and they're not
    doing their thing," Hutyra says. The long-term effect of unhappy soil is uncertain, but the findings also mean that urban soils, like those in
    Franklin Park, the largest public park in Boston, could have a greater
    capacity to store carbon than previously expected, says Garvey. Her
    next project will look deeper into the possible mechanisms behind the
    different carbon release and storage rates.

    Critical for Our Future Although discovering that urban trees and soils
    store more carbon might seem like "a double whammy of a good thing,"
    Hutyra says, it's unclear if this boost in carbon uptake will last as
    the planet continues to warm.

    Climate change could exacerbate carbon losses from soil, and the trees
    at the edge of forests in rural or urban areas could be more vulnerable
    to extreme heat and drought.

    "Forests store almost half of their carbon below ground," Garvey
    says. "Which is why understanding the relationships between the soil
    and the plant life is so vital to understanding the bigger picture of
    how forests store carbon for the long term." With cities and countries
    making commitments to plant more trees in an effort to curb the impacts of climate change, the researchers in Hutyra's lab all agree that thinking
    about the greater context of the trees and soils, and where new trees
    are planted, is extremely important. Factoring in the elevated amounts of carbon stored by forest edges should be taken into account when looking
    at long-term projections of climate change, as well.

    "We need to think about that as we [decide] what areas to
    conserve, what to develop, and how to tackle climate change
    solutions," Hutyra says. "Is a place like Franklin Park where
    there's tons of foot traffic just as valuable to save as a remote
    forest in Maine where three people visit? There's no easy answer." ========================================================================== Story Source: Materials provided by Boston_University. Original written
    by Jessica Colarossi.

    Note: Content may be edited for style and length.


    ========================================================================== Journal Reference:
    1. Sarah M. Garvey, Pamela H. Templer, Erin A. Pierce, Andrew
    B. Reinmann,
    Lucy R. Hutyra. Diverging patterns at the forest edge: Soil
    respiration dynamics of fragmented forests in urban and rural
    areas. Global Change Biology, 2022; DOI: 10.1111/gcb.16099 ==========================================================================

    Link to news story: https://www.sciencedaily.com/releases/2022/02/220216153902.htm

    --- up 10 weeks, 4 days, 7 hours, 13 minutes
    * Origin: -=> Castle Rock BBS <=- Now Husky HPT Powered! (1:317/3)