Is there a reliable way to send from ftelnet to a fossil y-modem BBS Protocol? I'm trying the latest ftelnet snippit from ftelnet.ca and the prototype fdsz dated 04-29-97 using the dsz -g (though not documented
in fdsz) command with rb and sb. I still get an error that G is expected, but not received from the ftelnet ymodem upload window. I've been able to transfer from fdsz through olms2000 to ftelnet successfully using y-modem.
I haven't tried transfering from ftelnet to fdsz successfully. I'm running EleBBS, but any protocols for any bbs that use fossil drivers are acceptable.
Thanks! Hopefully I supplied enough information. If it matters, I'm running
rb and sb are for receiving and sending ymodem batch with fdsz, not a typo. Thanks for the help!
you shouldnt use fdsz anyways.
rb and sb are for receiving and sending ymodem batch with fdsz, not a typo. Thanks for the help!
i wouldn't even use it to send via zmodem in this age.
it works fine for hundreds of people. you just cant run it because
your ghost developer can't make a 32bit renegade. well you cant unless you use rick's source and stamp your name on it.
Dude, go fuck yourself and troll on your own board. No one cares what you
have to say. Go make some more rezipped archives and say they are better than everything.
Mr. Professor.
i am on my own board. you don't understand current bbs softwares.
* Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)
i am on my own board. you don't understand current bbs softwares.
You're stuck in the 16bit world of obsolete softwares.
Lux and I just made sense out of the huge mess of your(?) 'updates' and st files. or should i say lee palmer. I heard nothing but complaints over th
files. or should i say lee palmer. I heard nothing but complaints over th years so we made something simple for people to use and they loved it.
years so we made something simple for people to use and they loved it.
Just like you should be doing, I said it was an 'unofficial release'.
Your(?) work was a huge embarassing mess. I don't know how someone could release something like that.
Making a clean working usable version is something you(?) never thought of doing. instead you'd rather make a new version for something trivial to ma it seem like renegade was being developed.
Never worked on the file system, never made it 32bit. made a mess out of menu system and data files. Made it a pain in the ass for people to impor
No wonder like only 4 people run renegade out of the thousands of bbses, m and mushes that run now.
Mr. Professor.
That's still a lame ass attempt at being deroatory. you should find someo
i am on my own board. you don't understand current bbs softwares.
* Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)
Doesn't look like it Mr. Professor.
Didn't know there anything to make sense for? It started in 2003, and released ever ver inbetween. If you goto the offical RG website of www.rgbbs.info, you'll find them all there and in order in which they
were released.
Why would I make BBS setup with doors and everything else? So some dumb ass can unzip it and put it online? No. This hobby was NEVER meant to be that and I refuse to give into morons that refuse to learn. Just
like those stupid mystic youtube videos. Seriously? If you can't setup the BBS software from the docs, YOU DO NOT NEED TO RUN ONE because you
do not understand it at all!
Third, how many retards run their BBS in the cloud? That is STUPID.
If you don't want to put the time in, the money, the hardware, get out
of the hobby. Oh hi, I run a BBS it's at blah blah blah, I log in every
5 weeks and see if the VM on my cloudhost I PAY stupid amounts of money for is still working or even STILL there.
This hobby is whatever someone wants it to be. This is very gatekeeper-ish. There are many cool BBSes online that leverage some more modern technology.
So I've stayed out of the conversation til now but feel compelled to respo bit here. I don't use Synchronet /or/ Renegade and don't have a dog in thi specific fight, but...where's the history file? A comprehensive whatsnew o what differentiates one version to the next? Unless you're a Renegade dieh I don't see many people walking up and looking at RG as an option without understanding what's happening with each release. It's pretty black box. J my $.02.
you're talking to jas, but you're posting on a forum with other people, an
How many people let the internet into their home firewall because they want run a DOS BBS? If you ask me, /THAT/ is what's retarded. I travel for work
"Retarded" is very subjective... 99% of the world thinks we're ALL nuts for what we're doing here.
It's in every update archive.
So I've stayed out of the conversation til now but feel compelled to respond a bit here. I don't use Synchronet /or/ Renegade and don't have a dog in this specific fight, but...where's the history file? A comprehensive whatsnew or what differentiates one version to the next? Unless you're a Renegade diehard, I don't see many people walking up and looking at RG as an option without understanding what's happening with each release. It's pretty black box. Just my $.02.
Why would I make BBS setup with doors and everything else? So some dumb ass can unzip it and put it online? No. This hobby was NEVER
like those stupid mystic youtube videos. Seriously? If you can't setup the BBS software from the docs, YOU DO NOT NEED TO RUN ONE because you
do not understand it at all!
This hobby is whatever someone wants it to be. This is very gatekeeper-ish. There are many cool BBSes online that leverage some more modern technology. And the Mystic YouTube videos democratized FTN.
I rebuilt a car engine with the help of YouTube. No purists yelled at me about doing it wrong since I didn't sit there with a howto manual printed in black and white.
Third, how many retards run their BBS in the cloud? That is STUPID. If you don't want to put the time in, the money, the hardware, get out of the hobby. Oh hi, I run a BBS it's at blah blah blah, I log in every
5 weeks and see if the VM on my cloudhost I PAY stupid amounts of
How many people let the internet into their home firewall because they want to run a DOS BBS? If you ask me, /THAT/ is what's retarded. I travel for work a lot and run everything in the cloud because I'm not 14 sitting in my parents' basement waiting for someone to dial into my BBS.
Anyway I don't intend to go back and forth and/or fight about this stuff, I just felt compelled to call out the immaturity and gatekeeping here. Yeah, you're talking to jas, but you're posting on a forum with other people, and your general attitude here is one that makes me scratch my head.
you're talking to jas, but you're posting on a forum with other people, an
I'm just talking to a jackhole that doesn't know when to shut his mouth (Jas, not you) .... if you ever saw that crap before you understand.
It's in every update archive.
Ok, so, I went on rgbbs.info and I see no history or changelog. I see some downloads so I snag the 1.30 full install. I unzip it. There is no history or changelog. I install it. I see no history or changelog. In RGV130.DOC there is mention of a WHATDONE file which I can't find anywhere.
So, where is someone supposed to know the new features you're building? I am at a loss :)
Ok, so, I went on rgbbs.info and I see no history or changelog. I see some downloads so I snag the 1.30 full install. I unzip it. There is no history changelog. I install it. I see no history or changelog. In RGV130.DOC ther mention of a WHATDONE file which I can't find anywhere.
I'm just talking to a jackhole that doesn't know when to shut his mouth (Jas, not you) .... if you ever saw that crap before you understand.
You just want me to shut my mouth because I speak the truth.
You seem like you know how to properly run a VLAN and insulate yourself. Go on you. I can't say the same for other sysops necessarily...real security requires dedication, as the risk landscape changes daily. My personal preference is to dump this responsibility onto people that run big datacent leasing VPS slices where a core part of their business relies on preventing nefarious actors from exploiting things.
In any case I didn't mean to insult anyone for doing things the way you do, was more a response to how TJ was phrasing things which got under my skin a bit.
The change log is in the UPDATE archives. No need to put a whatdone in a new full install. Who would care what was done when they are "new". I used to have it as a running list, but it got WAYYY to long, so I just put the change from last ver to this ver in each update log.
You can also see what has changed since 1.30 over here on my main menu for the next up coming release.
--- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
* Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)
--- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
* Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)
Love that new board of yours.
--- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
* Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)
Love that new board of yours.
yep you still dont understand.
--- SBBSecho 3.20-Linux
* Origin: Vertrauen - [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net (1:103/705)
The change log is in the UPDATE archives. No need to put a whatdone in
a new full install. Who would care what was done when they are "new".
I used to have it as a running list, but it got WAYYY to long, so I
just put the change from last ver to this ver in each update log.
Any reason you can't have a running changelog on the website? I can't say I agree with your assessment here. The Synchronet changelog and Mystic change are both extremely useful.
So the answer is, maybe you are not someone that would care, but that's because you innately know what's new and none of us do. :)
Any reason you can't have a running changelog on the website? I can't say
So the answer is, maybe you are not someone that would care, but that's because you innately know what's new and none of us do. :)
I probably can ... no one has ever asked for it. Might look into it when I'm off work for Christmas week. It's a long damn list from 2003 until now.
I actually was porting my v1.30 DOCs (which mr. professor says aren't real) to amke some nce HTML screens for them, but the way I want to do it with
Any reason you can't have a running changelog on the website? I can't say
2713 lines long is the changelog .... I'll get around to it here sooner or later. Was going to post it here in raw form, but I'd have to cut it into like 10 msgs.
2713 lines long is the changelog .... I'll get around to it here sooner or later. Was going to post it here in raw form, but I'd have to cut it into like 10 msgs.
this is the bbs_carnival echo. not a renegade echo.
2713 lines long is the changelog .... I'll get around to it here sooner
or later. Was going to post it here in raw form, but I'd have to cut
it into like 10 msgs.
Sysop: | Coz |
---|---|
Location: | Anoka, MN |
Users: | 2 |
Nodes: | 4 (0 / 4) |
Uptime: | 32:55:40 |
Calls: | 141 |
Files: | 5,058 |
Messages: | 220,694 |