a week. And keep `em coming, once a week, every week,
until the election.
The Senate vote to block documents and witnesses, and
then acquit Trump on Friday is only a minor setback for
Democrats, who do have a backup plan.
Speaker Pelosi will simply get up tomorrow morning,
have a fresh cup of espresso, and call her colleagues
Speaker Pelosi will then have everything she needs
to have the House pass another article of impeachment.
Speaker Pelosi will be eating a box of chocolates along
with drinking her cup of espresso when the votes come in.
Lee Lofaso wrote to All <=-
Speaker Pelosi will simply get up tomorrow morning,
have a fresh cup of espresso, and call her colleagues
in the House into session. Why? To issue a subpoena
to the one person the American people have been waiting
to hear from - John Bolton. He will gladly accept the
invitation, as he has already publicly stated his own
willingness (and eagerness) to testify. So this will
be a done deal.
John Bolton will then have his day telling his tale
to select members of the House (not sure which committee
will be handling this). This will be aired publicly
for all to see.
Speaker Pelosi will then have everything she needs
to have the House pass another article of impeachment.
She can have it ready to send to the Senate within
a week. And keep `em coming, once a week, every week,
until the election.
Remember, 53.7% of the American people voted for candidates
other than Trump last time. Imagine how many people will be
voting for somebody other than Trump this November.
Speaker Pelosi will be eating a box of chocolates along
with drinking her cup of espresso when the votes come in.
On 02-01-20 10:16, Gregory Deyss <=-
spoke to Lee Lofaso about Re: Prediction <=-
The Senate vote to block documents and witnesses, and
then acquit Trump on Friday is only a minor setback for
Democrats, who do have a backup plan.
The house had their opportunity to call witnesses they choose not to
call these individuals at the time. Missed opportunity that has passed.
On 02-01-20 10:16, Gregory Deyss <=-
spoke to Lee Lofaso about Re: Prediction <=-
The Senate vote to block documents and witnesses, and
then acquit Trump on Friday is only a minor setback for
Democrats, who do have a backup plan.
The house had their opportunity to call witnesses they choose not to call these individuals at the time. Missed opportunity that has passe
The house called witnesses. Trump blocked most of them from testifying.
On 02-02-20 08:14, Gregory Deyss <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Prediction <=-
The house had their opportunity to call witnesses they choose not to
call these individuals at the time. Missed
opportunity that has passe
The house called witnesses. Trump blocked most of them from testifying.
Nice try, but wrong.
The people that the house managers wanted within the Senate Trial were never called within the house committee.
The people that the house managers wanted within the Senate Trial wer never called within the house committee.
They tried, but the witnesses they wanted were blocked by Trump's claim
of absolute immunity.
On 02-03-20 07:38, Gregory Deyss <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Prediction <=-
The people that the house managers wanted within
the Senate Trial wer
never called within the house committee.
They tried, but the witnesses they wanted were blocked by Trump's claim
of absolute immunity.
It's a matter of public record and history, who the house managers
wanted to call for witnesses within the Senate trial. These people were never called, just as they were never called with the impeachment proceedings within the house committee.
The President and The White House supported in every way with the
Mueller investigation and its team who they wanted to call, these witlessness were not called then either.
They tried, but the witnesses they wanted were blocked by Trump's cla of absolute immunity.
The President and The White House supported in every way with the Mueller investigation and its team who they wanted to call, these witlessness were not called then either.
And you are proof that if you have no defense to the truth, side step to another topic and make up derogatory names to support your delusions.
On 02-04-20 07:25, Gregory Deyss <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Prediction <=-
They tried, but the witnesses they wanted were
blocked by Trump's cla
of absolute immunity.
Alright then name them. or use the mighty the Internet to prove me
wrong. I also will dive into the deep dark hell that is MSNBC and Fake News CNN to prove my previous statement false.
The President and The White House supported in every way with the
Mueller investigation and its team who they wanted to call, these witlessness were not called then either.
And you are proof that if you have no defense to the truth, side step to another topic and make up derogatory names to support your delusions.
It's not side stepping if it is the truth. It is also not side
stepping if it's connected and relevant to the beginnings to the Dems attempts of this overall hated of the POTUS.
Then there was Adam Schiff who got punk'd with two Russian comedians https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=m3Rut64GDgA&feature=youtu.be
a week. And keep `em coming, once a week, every week,
until the election.
Keeping `em coming is annoying. So what you're predicting is that this AT>lunatic will delay all kinds of other stuff from her constituents and keep AT>impeachment at the top of her priorities? That sounds like good ol' Nasty AT>Nance.
On 02-02-20 08:14, Gregory Deyss <=-
spoke to Dale Shipp about Re: Prediction <=-
The house had their opportunity to call witnesses they choose not to
call these individuals at the time. Missed
opportunity that has passe
The house called witnesses. Trump blocked most of them from testifying.
Nice try, but wrong.
The people that the house managers wanted within the Senate Trial were never called within the house committee.
They tried, but the witnesses they wanted were blocked by Trump's claim DS>of absolute immunity.
The republicans made several important mistakes during the impeachment trial in the senate.
One big mistake I think they made was the witness thing. They should have given the democrats witnesses full bore! And for every witness the democrats called the republicans should have called two! And every day
the trial in the senate went on the tape of Joe Biden bragging about getting the Ukraine prosecutor fired by threatening to withhold a
billion dollars, should have been played at least twice every time one
of the presidents defense attorneys came to the podium.
And when she tore up that copy of Trump's speech she demonstrated her childish hatred! A little girl in a temper tantrum.
They should have given them witnesses in spades!
And when she tore up that copy of Trump's speech she demonstrated her childish hatred! A little girl in a temper tantrum.
It was ridiculous. I used to think there were democrats who had integrity, AT>so that part of me wonders how they feel being represented by her, but AT>that part of me is gone - none of them have any integrity; not in the AT>house, senate, not state-level democrats, not even city-level democrats. AT>They are literally the party of corruption. So Nancy has no integrity to AT>uphold. The only way I can justify anything any of them do, is by AT>comparing them to other Democrats who are worse.
They should have given them witnesses in spades!
Even if they did call witnesses, the Democrats wouldn't give up. They AT>would just find something else to cry about.
They will never give up - and will never give in. House reps are like AT>employees who we hired to innovate, but instead, they just clean the floor AT>all day.
The republicans made several important mistakes during the impeachment trial in the senate.
One big mistake I think they made was the witness thing. They should have given the democrats witnesses full bore! And for every witness the democrats called the republicans should have called two! And every day
the trial in the senate went on the tape of Joe Biden bragging about getting the Ukraine prosecutor fired by threatening to withhold a
billion dollars, should have been played at least twice every time one
of the presidents defense attorneys came to the podium.
The DEMS had their opportunity when they had control within the house. GD>Dale can spout off names all he wants, the facts are unchanged however GD>because these people were never called to testify or nor were they blocked GD>as he wants to pretend.
Point of Order was called so much that if anyone of us, wanted to GD>entertain law school, we would of covered the chapter on what not do as a GD>lawyer. .
On 02-22-20 15:37, Tim Richardson <=-
spoke to Aaron Thomas about Re: Prediction <=-
Trump having the Vindman brothers marched out of the White House sent
her into another one of her snits. Topped only by her reaction to
Trump's new acting intelligence chief. Whom he directed to `clean
house'!
On 02-22-20 18:11, Tim Richardson <=-
spoke to Gregory Deyss about Re: Prediction <=-
Not allowing republicans the same subpoena power the democrats had,
and shutting off any mention of the whistleblower's name, or even any allusion to him (especially when John roberts did so in the Senate
trial) pretty much put an end to impeachment.
They should have given them witnesses in spades!
Even if they did call witnesses, the Democrats wouldn't give up. They AT>would just find something else to cry about.
They will never give up - and will never give in. House reps are like AT>employees who we hired to innovate, but instead, they just clean thefloor
all day.
It is becoming more and more clear that Donald Trump was the upset of the
2016 election.....and is probably going to get a second term.
On 02-22-20 15:37, Tim Richardson <=-
spoke to Aaron Thomas about Re: Prediction <=-
Trump having the Vindman brothers marched out of the White House sent
her into another one of her snits. Topped only by her reaction to
Trump's new acting intelligence chief. Whom he directed to `clean
house'!
There was no reason other than petty vidictiveness to do what he did to DS>the Vindman brothers. The new acting intelligence chief has no back DS>ground in intelligence. His only qualification is bowing down to Trump DS>and praising him on twitter.
On 02-22-20 18:11, Tim Richardson <=-
spoke to Gregory Deyss about Re: Prediction <=-
Not allowing republicans the same subpoena power the democrats had,
and shutting off any mention of the whistleblower's name, or even any allusion to him (especially when John roberts did so in the Senate
trial) pretty much put an end to impeachment.
Shutting off mention of the whistleblower's name was because his/her DS>anonimity was protected under law. Outing would have been a violation
of that law.
| Sysop: | Coz |
|---|---|
| Location: | Anoka, MN |
| Users: | 2 |
| Nodes: | 4 (0 / 4) |
| Uptime: | 05:31:39 |
| Calls: | 97 |
| Files: | 4,620 |
| Messages: | 216,793 |