Not sure what editor you're using... but all the ANSi code intermingled makes it nearly impossible to actually read through on a non-terminal.

Thank you - I switched to Mystic, and I bet the QWK isn't setup correctly. I will get on it... sorry for any posts that have looked stupid. UGH.



|07p|15AULIE|1142|07o
|08.........

Re: Re: Python help...
By: paulie420 to Tracker1 on Wed Sep 02 2020 10:40 pm

Not sure what editor you're using... but all the ANSi code intermingled makes it nearly impossible to actually read through on a non-terminal.

Thank you - I switched to Mystic, and I bet the QWK isn't setup correctly. I will get on it... sorry for any posts that have looked stupid. UGH.

|07p|15AULIE|1142|07o
|08.........

And this message didn't have a QWKnet tagline.

digital man

Synchronet/BBS Terminology Definition #42:
IMAP = Internet Message Access Protocol
Norco, CA WX: 87.5øF, 43.0% humidity, 5 mph NE wind, 0.00 inches rain/24hrs
---
þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net

Re: Re: Python help...
By: paulie420 to Tracker1 on Wed Sep 02 2020 10:40 pm

Thank you - I switched to Mystic

Sorry for your loss.

I'm still running Sync!! But have a mystic... however, I guess I need to fix
my QWK so I'm trying not to make a bunch of posts... my messages dont have a QWK tagline.



|07p|15AULIE|1142|07o
|08.........

On 09-08-20 23:09, Denn wrote to MRO <=-

:) Wonder why he switched when he can run both like I do?

As do I. :)


... A hunch is creativity trying to tell you something.
--- MultiMail/Win v0.51
þ Synchronet þ Freeway BBS, Bendigo Australia. freeway.apana.org.au

On 08 Sep 2020, Denn said the following...

Re: Re: Python help...
By: MRO to paulie420 on Thu Sep 03 2020 07:43 pm

Thank you - I switched to Mystic

Sorry for your loss.

:) Wonder why he switched when he can run both like I do?

I do run both; American Pi is @ AmericanPiBBS.com and 20 For Beers is @ 20ForBeers.com:1337 ...

Guess I should have stated such; point was that I must have the QWK settings messed up for the Mystic BBS cause Digital Man says I was missing a QWK tag line or kludge line... and another poster said my messages had tons of extra character garbage.

So I have been trying not to post much - and need to go iron that out so my Mystic BBS posted posts come thru normal. :/



|07p|15AULIE|1142|07o
|08.........

Re: Re: Python help...
By: poindexter FORTRAN to paulie420 on Thu Sep 10 2020 10:09 am

paulie420 wrote to Denn <=-

I do run both; American Pi is @ AmericanPiBBS.com and 20 For Beers is @ 20ForBeers.com:1337 ...

I've been doing a lot of work with NGINX and reverse proxying
HTTP/HTTPS. If there were a way to reverse proxy SSH, I'd love it -
throw a ton of different BBSes behind a proxy and sort them out by
hostname.

... If you have a rotary phone, please press 1 now.

You can probably do that with stock software already.

Create a user account in your proxy machine for every BBS you want to reverse proxy for. Then configure such user to be capable of connecting to each target BBS onl¤y. This way if the client does synchronetclone@proxymachine.org, user "synchronetclone" is called up and inmediatelly connects to the "SinchronetClone" BBS.

It is not exactly transparent, I know.

I have looked into OpenBSD's relayd but it does not look like it has that function.

--
gopher://gopher.operationalsecurity.es

---
þ Synchronet þ Palantir BBS * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL

Re: Re: Python help...
By: poindexter FORTRAN to paulie420 on Thu Sep 10 2020 10:09 am

I've been doing a lot of work with NGINX and reverse proxying
HTTP/HTTPS. If there were a way to reverse proxy SSH, I'd love it -
throw a ton of different BBSes behind a proxy and sort them out by hostname.

Unfortunately that's not possible. You can proxy TCP traffic, but nginx can't terminate the encryption for SSH, nor can HAProxy, fabio, or any other reverse proxy system.

I just set up a reverse NGINX proxy on a dual-64 core EPYC (7742) server this week. We had it handling about 70,000 SSL connections per second (real world traffic) while only running around 45% CPU usage, with SMT (AMD's version of hyperthreading) turned off.

at that point we ran out of SSL traffic to throw at it.

DaiTengu

... No good deed goes unpunished.

---
þ Synchronet þ War Ensemble BBS - The sport is war, total war - warensemble.com

paulie420 wrote:

^[[0m^[[1;1H^[[1mI am working on a Raspberry Pi Zero project. Using a 1941 Phil
^[[A^[[62Cco Predicta^[[B^[[73Dtelevision, that I fully refurbished, I want to c
^[[A^[[49Create some python code to^[[B^[[74Dplay a random video with a digital

...que?

---
þ Synchronet þ End Of The Line BBS - endofthelinebbs.com

On 9/10/2020 10:09 AM, poindexter FORTRAN wrote:

I do run both; American Pi is @ AmericanPiBBS.com and 20 For Beers is @ 20ForBeers.com:1337 ...

I've been doing a lot of work with NGINX and reverse proxying
HTTP/HTTPS. If there were a way to reverse proxy SSH, I'd love it -
throw a ton of different BBSes behind a proxy and sort them out by
hostname.

Probably could with client keys and credential forwarding... you can
also do a reverse proxy over a websocket, but that would something on
the client to handle that aspect.

Would love it if syncterm supported wss+PROT and/or ws+PROT so you could
do rlogin/telnet/ssh over a websocket connection. Of course that messes
with the IP detected on the backing server/service.

--
Michael J. Ryan
tracker1 +o Roughneck BBS

---
þ Synchronet þ Roughneck BBS - coming back 2/2/20

On 9/12/2020 11:05 PM, DaiTengu wrote:

I just set up a reverse NGINX proxy on a dual-64 core EPYC (7742) server this week. We had it handling about 70,000 SSL connections per second (real world traffic) while only running around 45% CPU usage, with SMT (AMD's version of hyperthreading) turned off.

at that point we ran out of SSL traffic to throw at it.

If all it does is reverse-proxy, may also want to take a look at Caddy
v2, and see if you get more throughput.

--
Michael J. Ryan
tracker1 +o Roughneck BBS

---
þ Synchronet þ Roughneck BBS - coming back 2/2/20

Re: Re: Python help...
By: Tracker1 to DaiTengu on Mon Sep 21 2020 03:46 pm

I just set up a reverse NGINX proxy on a dual-64 core EPYC (7742)
server this week. We had it handling about 70,000 SSL connections per
second (real world traffic) while only running around 45% CPU usage,
with SMT (AMD's version of hyperthreading) turned off.

at that point we ran out of SSL traffic to throw at it.

If all it does is reverse-proxy, may also want to take a look at Caddy v2, and see if you get more throughput.

We use some nginx modules as well. I'd have to dig through Caddy and see if there's anything similar.

I'm more worried about the Linux kernel limitations than anything else.

I guess we'll see how it goes! :)

DaiTengu

... Everything beautiful has its moment and then passes away.

---
þ Synchronet þ War Ensemble BBS - The sport is war, total war - warensemble.com