• phones BIGGER.. computers SMALLER..

    From Underminer@VERT/UNDRMINE to Ogg on Sat Jul 25 11:28:28 2020
    Re: phones BIGGER.. computers SMALLER..
    By: Ogg to All on Sat Jul 25 2020 08:54 am

    Something that creeps me out: manufacturers trying to make phones
    BIGGER instead of more portable, while trying to make computers
    SMALLER instead of more comfortable to work with.
    Never looked at the matter that way. You have identified an interesting trend.

    Soon we will be in a world with nothing but Phablets everywhere.
    ---
    Underminer
    The Undermine BBS - bbs.undermine.ca:423
    Fidonet: 1:342/17
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ The Undermine - bbs.undermine.ca:423
  • From Ogg@VERT/EOTLBBS to Underminer on Sat Jul 25 17:49:00 2020
    Hello Underminer!

    ** On Saturday 25.07.20 - 13:28, underminer wrote to Ogg:

    Something that creeps me out: manufacturers trying to make phones
    BIGGER instead of more portable, while trying to make computers
    SMALLER instead of more comfortable to work with.

    Never looked at the matter that way. You have identified an interesting Og>> trend.

    Soon we will be in a world with nothing but Phablets everywhere.


    The Zanco S-Pen might be something I would be willing to try out. The
    camera function would be handy at a moment's notice. Then, as long as the battery charge holds up as long as they claim - compared to the paltry
    6hours on the Servo and only 2G - then the idea of a "pen" sized phone
    works for me.

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ End Of The Line BBS - endofthelinebbs.com
  • From Arelor@VERT/PALANT to Ogg on Sat Jul 25 17:16:42 2020
    Re: phones BIGGER.. computers SMALLER..
    By: Ogg to All on Sat Jul 25 2020 08:54 am

    All I need is a device that is JUST a phone. Maybe a small screen running along the length of the device for Caller-ID, but that's it.

    For the record, my personal beater is a Nokia 150 DS. The model is from 2016, but it is a dumbphone in imitation of the classic Nokias. Got it for about 30 bucks. My horses love grabbing my phones so I'd rather they grab a cheapo instead of something worth hundreds.

    --
    gopher://gopher.operationalsecurity.es

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Palantir BBS * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL
  • From Arelor@VERT/PALANT to Ogg on Sun Jul 26 04:18:16 2020
    Re: Re: phones BIGGER.. computers SMALLER..
    By: Ogg to Arelor on Sat Jul 25 2020 09:39 pm

    Hello Arelor!

    ** On Saturday 25.07.20 - 18:16, arelor wrote to Ogg:

    For the record, my personal beater is a Nokia 150 DS. The model is from 2016, but it is a dumbphone in imitation of the classic Nokias. Got it for about 30 bucks. My horses love grabbing my phones so I'd rather they grab cheapo instead of something worth hundreds.

    Does DS mean dual SIM?

    Is that the one featured here?: https://youtu.be/L35kPRslchQ

    I could live with one that size and basic functions.

    What's the battery life like?

    As it turns out, I only use the Blackberry as a mobile hotspot. I really don't need it for anything else. My spare batteries charge in about 4 hours. The hotspot function drains the most power in about 6 hours. When just on standby cellphone mode, the battery lasts much longer.


    Yes, DS stands for Dual SIM. I use one for my personal line, and another for the emergency job line.

    No Youtube here, sorry. But Iam sure you found it because it is a very easy to find phone:

    https://www.devicespecifications.com/en/model/7247402e

    Battery is eternal. I think I recharge about once a week or so.

    The camera sucks, and the documentation sucks, and audio quality is 5 over 10. Also no bluetooth -> hands free integration with the car. I often use the torch, the FM radio and the alarm. Other than that is just an expendable phone that takes and sends calls for ridiculously cheap. The only isue it has is they are shutting down the network it uses in lots of countries. Too bad.

    But seriously, I'd buy it again. My horses have bitten, beaten and abused mine none stop and it still works. My Sophie grabbed it, ran away with it and dropped it in a horse pee pool once. After drying and cleaning, the thing still works. My old Samsung Galaxy died arter half what this one has suffered.


    --
    gopher://gopher.operationalsecurity.es

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Palantir BBS * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL
  • From Andeddu@VERT/AMSTRAD to Arelor on Thu Jul 30 17:43:44 2020
    Re: Re: phones BIGGER.. computers SMALLER..
    By: Arelor to Ogg on Thu Jul 30 2020 05:31 am

    They are killing 2G and EDGE by 2025. I am not sure riht now but I think I am on one
    of those.

    3G was scheduled to be killed earlier than that, actually.

    All the cool kids are moving to 4G. Which I can't explain because 4G has not half the
    coverage 3G or 2G have each. Oh well.

    I don't know what it's like where you're from but 4G is solid here in the UK. I can't remember the last time I connected to my WiFi router with my phone as the cell signal here is as good, or better, than most WiFi signals. 3G is so slow, it's not fit for anything other than basic web-browsing... it's a very poor experience, but it's still better than nothing. I can stream 1080p movies with no buffering on 4G, I love it!

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ BBS for Amstrad computer users including CPC, PPC and PCW!
  • From MRO@VERT/BBSESINF to Andeddu on Thu Jul 30 17:19:10 2020
    Re: Re: phones BIGGER.. computers SMALLER
    By: Andeddu to Arelor on Thu Jul 30 2020 05:43 pm

    UK. I can't remember the last time I connected to my WiFi router with my phone as the cell signal here is as good, or better, than most WiFi signals. 3G is so slow, it's not fit for anything other than basic web-browsing... it's a very poor experience, but it's still better than nothing. I can stream 1080p movies with no buffering on 4G, I love it!


    if all i could get was 3g i wouldnt even get a fucking smartphone.
    3g is so slow in comparison to 4g.


    ---
    þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::
  • From MRO@VERT/BBSESINF to Arelor on Thu Jul 30 22:12:07 2020
    Re: Re: phones BIGGER.. computers SMALLER..
    By: Arelor to Andeddu on Thu Jul 30 2020 06:11 pm

    3G is actually quite fine for messaging and emailing, which is actually what phones were supposed to be for in the first place. Communications.


    WRONG! It's for me to read news stories while i poop for 45 mins.

    I happen to live in a digital exclusion zone. That means I only get stable Internet via a WISP provider that uses a line-of-sight wireless protocol. Mobile networking reception here is poor _at best_. So I am not impressed by claims about networks that can download three hours of cartoons into my mobile in a second since they don't reach this place for the most part.


    that sucks you dont have decent internet access. i admit i am an addict and i love being jacked in all the time.
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::
  • From Gamgee@VERT/PALANT to MRO on Thu Jul 30 21:44:00 2020
    MRO wrote to Andeddu <=-

    if all i could get was 3g i wouldnt even get a fucking
    smartphone. 3g is so slow in comparison to 4g.

    It's very fast in comparison to no smartphone.



    ... If it walks out of your refrigerator, let it go.
    --- MultiMail/Linux v0.52
    þ Synchronet þ Palantir BBS * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL
  • From Andeddu@VERT/AMSTRAD to MRO on Sat Aug 1 00:39:13 2020
    Re: Re: phones BIGGER.. computers SMALLER..
    By: MRO to Andeddu on Thu Jul 30 2020 05:19 pm

    if all i could get was 3g i wouldnt even get a fucking smartphone.
    3g is so slow in comparison to 4g.

    I'll defend it for web-browsing... it's no where near as good as 4G but it's capable for that. Try watching a YouTube video on it and watch the resolution drop a few notches!

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ BBS for Amstrad computer users including CPC, PPC and PCW!
  • From Andeddu@VERT/AMSTRAD to Arelor on Sat Aug 1 00:49:28 2020
    Re: Re: phones BIGGER.. computers SMALLER..
    By: Arelor to Andeddu on Thu Jul 30 2020 06:11 pm

    Then you must have a gigantic data plan.

    I really see no need to use mobile Internet if a trusted LAN is available. Mobile
    Internet costs more money than it is worth.

    3G is actually quite fine for messaging and emailing, which is actually what phones
    were supposed to be for in the first place. Communications.

    Lots of industrial applications rely on 2g here. They have built 2g into industrial
    and security products for long because 2g happens to be way more solid than anything
    else mobile networks carry arround. At least here.

    I happen to live in a digital exclusion zone. That means I only get stable Internet
    via a WISP provider that uses a line-of-sight wireless protocol. Mobile networking
    reception here is poor _at best_. So I am not impressed by claims about networks that
    can download three hours of cartoons into my mobile in a second since they don't reach
    this place for the most part.

    I have a very reasonable SIM only all you can eat internet package from Three costing me a mere 20 pounds per month. It never slows down regardless of my data usage. Since I got my phone 2 years ago, I have burned through 750GB of data which mostly constitutes video streaming. It's quicker than my broadband so I never connect my phone to my WiFi unless there's a cell-site that's down due to maintenence.

    It's a shame you don't recieve any decent cell signals where you are from... sometimes I take it for granted that I have a broadband quality connection pretty much anywhere I go.

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ BBS for Amstrad computer users including CPC, PPC and PCW!