Something that creeps me out: manufacturers trying to make phonesNever looked at the matter that way. You have identified an interesting trend.
BIGGER instead of more portable, while trying to make computers
SMALLER instead of more comfortable to work with.
Something that creeps me out: manufacturers trying to make phones
BIGGER instead of more portable, while trying to make computers
SMALLER instead of more comfortable to work with.
Never looked at the matter that way. You have identified an interesting Og>> trend.
Soon we will be in a world with nothing but Phablets everywhere.
All I need is a device that is JUST a phone. Maybe a small screen running along the length of the device for Caller-ID, but that's it.
Hello Arelor!
** On Saturday 25.07.20 - 18:16, arelor wrote to Ogg:
For the record, my personal beater is a Nokia 150 DS. The model is from 2016, but it is a dumbphone in imitation of the classic Nokias. Got it for about 30 bucks. My horses love grabbing my phones so I'd rather they grab cheapo instead of something worth hundreds.
Does DS mean dual SIM?
Is that the one featured here?: https://youtu.be/L35kPRslchQ
I could live with one that size and basic functions.
What's the battery life like?
As it turns out, I only use the Blackberry as a mobile hotspot. I really don't need it for anything else. My spare batteries charge in about 4 hours. The hotspot function drains the most power in about 6 hours. When just on standby cellphone mode, the battery lasts much longer.
They are killing 2G and EDGE by 2025. I am not sure riht now but I think I am on one
of those.
3G was scheduled to be killed earlier than that, actually.
All the cool kids are moving to 4G. Which I can't explain because 4G has not half the
coverage 3G or 2G have each. Oh well.
UK. I can't remember the last time I connected to my WiFi router with my phone as the cell signal here is as good, or better, than most WiFi signals. 3G is so slow, it's not fit for anything other than basic web-browsing... it's a very poor experience, but it's still better than nothing. I can stream 1080p movies with no buffering on 4G, I love it!
3G is actually quite fine for messaging and emailing, which is actually what phones were supposed to be for in the first place. Communications.
I happen to live in a digital exclusion zone. That means I only get stable Internet via a WISP provider that uses a line-of-sight wireless protocol. Mobile networking reception here is poor _at best_. So I am not impressed by claims about networks that can download three hours of cartoons into my mobile in a second since they don't reach this place for the most part.
MRO wrote to Andeddu <=-
if all i could get was 3g i wouldnt even get a fucking
smartphone. 3g is so slow in comparison to 4g.
if all i could get was 3g i wouldnt even get a fucking smartphone.
3g is so slow in comparison to 4g.
Then you must have a gigantic data plan.
I really see no need to use mobile Internet if a trusted LAN is available. Mobile
Internet costs more money than it is worth.
3G is actually quite fine for messaging and emailing, which is actually what phones
were supposed to be for in the first place. Communications.
Lots of industrial applications rely on 2g here. They have built 2g into industrial
and security products for long because 2g happens to be way more solid than anything
else mobile networks carry arround. At least here.
I happen to live in a digital exclusion zone. That means I only get stable Internet
via a WISP provider that uses a line-of-sight wireless protocol. Mobile networking
reception here is poor _at best_. So I am not impressed by claims about networks that
can download three hours of cartoons into my mobile in a second since they don't reach
this place for the most part.
Sysop: | Coz |
---|---|
Location: | Anoka, MN |
Users: | 2 |
Nodes: | 4 (0 / 4) |
Uptime: | 00:43:39 |
Calls: | 97 |
Files: | 4,620 |
Messages: | 216,743 |