• HD vs 4K

    From The Millionaire@VERT to All on Thu Mar 18 20:42:37 2021
    Why do some movies take so long to convert from HD to 4K?

    $ The Millionaire $
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net
  • From Nightfox@VERT/DIGDIST to The Millionaire on Thu Mar 18 21:13:52 2021
    Re: HD vs 4K
    By: The Millionaire to All on Thu Mar 18 2021 08:42 pm

    Why do some movies take so long to convert from HD to 4K?

    Are you referring to any specific software and machine being used? That depends widely on both factors, as well as the method of upscaling it (such as using AI or a more simple method). More information may be helpful in answering your question.

    I've used Topaz Labs Video Enhance AI, which can use either a CPU or a graphics card. A dedicated graphics card is much faster, though it still takes quite a while. From what I've seen, the size of the source image seems to be one of the biggest factors in the upscale time. And it seems just the process of using AI to recognize the image and fill in details takes time. I don't know enough about it to give more information.

    Nightfox

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com
  • From The Millionaire@VERT to Nightfox on Fri Mar 19 04:31:00 2021
    Re: HD vs 4K
    By: The Millionaire to All on Thu Mar 18 2021 08:42 pm

    Are you referring to any specific software and machine being used? That depends widely on both factors, as well as the method of upscaling it (such as using AI or a more simple method). More information may be helpful in answering your question.

    I've used Topaz Labs Video Enhance AI, which can use either a CPU or a graphics card. A dedicated graphics card is much faster, though it still takes quite a while. From what I've seen, the size of the source image seems to be one of the biggest factors in the upscale time. And it seems just the process of using AI to recognize the image and fill in details takes time. I don't know enough about it to give more information.

    Nightfox

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com



    I'm talking about movies in general here.

    $ The Millionaire $
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Vertrauen þ Home of Synchronet þ [vert/cvs/bbs].synchro.net
  • From Gamgee@VERT/PALANT to The Millionaire on Fri Mar 19 07:41:00 2021
    The Millionaire wrote to All <=-

    Why do some movies take so long to convert from HD to 4K?

    Because an iPad has very little computing power.


    ... All hope abandon, ye who enter messages here.
    --- MultiMail/Linux v0.52
    þ Synchronet þ Palantir BBS * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL
  • From Arelor@VERT/PALANT to Nightfox on Fri Mar 19 08:00:39 2021
    Re: HD vs 4K
    By: Nightfox to The Millionaire on Thu Mar 18 2021 09:13 pm

    Are you referring to any specific software and machine being used? That depends widely on both factors, as well as the method of upscaling it (such using AI or a more simple method). More information may be helpful in answering your question.


    I venture to say he means movies in general. "Why are they taking so long to release my favourite movie in 4k?"

    --
    gopher://gopher.richardfalken.com/1/richardfalken

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Palantir BBS * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL
  • From fusion@VERT/CFBBS to The Millionaire on Fri Mar 19 09:52:00 2021
    I'm talking about movies in general here.

    probably just having to clean and inspect almost every frame of the film, scan with a higher resolution (= slower) scanner, fix color, etc. luckily film quality is usually quite nice and using a modern scanner can get that much
    more data.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Windows/32)
    * Origin: cold fusion - cfbbs.net - grand rapids, mi
  • From Arelor@VERT/PALANT to fusion on Fri Mar 19 09:13:21 2021
    Re: Re: HD vs 4K
    By: fusion to The Millionaire on Fri Mar 19 2021 09:52 am

    I'm talking about movies in general here.

    probably just having to clean and inspect almost every frame of the film, sc with a higher resolution (= slower) scanner, fix color, etc. luckily film quality is usually quite nice and using a modern scanner can get that much more data.

    You know, I once heard that if you had well preserved master films in 25mm, those still beat modern digital recordings (even films from the 1920s) and benefit when upgraded from mpeg 4 to an HD capable format.

    --
    gopher://gopher.richardfalken.com/1/richardfalken

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Palantir BBS * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL
  • From Nightfox@VERT/DIGDIST to The Millionaire on Fri Mar 19 08:09:35 2021
    Re: HD vs 4K
    By: The Millionaire to Nightfox on Fri Mar 19 2021 04:31 am

    I'm talking about movies in general here.

    Ah. Would have been good to clarify that in your question.

    It seems to me the movie market has been changing as far as the way people consume movies. Generally, people aren't buying movies to own like they used to. People often stream movies online these days rather than own or rent physical media. So these days, I suppose they'd remaster a movie in 4K if they think they could make money from it via streaming.

    Personally, I still sometimes like to buy movies to own.

    Nightfox

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com
  • From Nightfox@VERT/DIGDIST to Arelor on Fri Mar 19 08:10:19 2021
    Re: HD vs 4K
    By: Arelor to Nightfox on Fri Mar 19 2021 08:00 am

    I venture to say he means movies in general. "Why are they taking so long to release my favourite movie in 4k?"

    I've been doing some video upscaling lately, so I guess that's why I interpreted his question that way.

    Nightfox

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com
  • From Nightfox@VERT/DIGDIST to fusion on Fri Mar 19 08:13:53 2021
    Re: Re: HD vs 4K
    By: fusion to The Millionaire on Fri Mar 19 2021 09:52 am

    probably just having to clean and inspect almost every frame of the film, scan with a higher resolution (= slower) scanner, fix color, etc. luckily film quality is usually quite nice and using a modern scanner can get that much more data.

    They've done that with many movies for the transitions from VHS to DVD, then to 1080p blu-ray, etc.. It does seem like it has taken longer to remaster some movies to 4K though.

    I'm still waiting for a high-def release of The Abyss. I don't think that has officially even been released on 1080p yet (though I'm not sure).

    Nightfox

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com
  • From fusion@VERT/CFBBS to Nightfox on Fri Mar 19 18:52:00 2021
    On 19 Mar 2021, Nightfox said the following...

    Personally, I still sometimes like to buy movies to own.

    i've already had plenty of occasions where this or that movie that i randomly think of is not on any of the streaming sites. or is behind a premium hbo/starz/etc paywall. or have made it half way through a show only to find
    out i only have a month to finish because it's going offline.

    it seems to be the total opposite of the premium music services where your initial buy in gets you pretty much every album ever made regardless of if
    it's itunes, amazon, spotify or whoever

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Windows/32)
    * Origin: cold fusion - cfbbs.net - grand rapids, mi
  • From fusion@VERT/CFBBS to Nightfox on Fri Mar 19 18:56:00 2021
    I'm still waiting for a high-def release of The Abyss. I don't think
    that has officially even been released on 1080p yet (though I'm not

    according to the wiki that one sounds like a big mess. someone's working on
    it at least.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Windows/32)
    * Origin: cold fusion - cfbbs.net - grand rapids, mi
  • From Nightfox@VERT/DIGDIST to fusion on Sat Mar 20 11:02:54 2021
    Re: Re: HD vs 4K
    By: fusion to Nightfox on Fri Mar 19 2021 06:52 pm

    Personally, I still sometimes like to buy movies to own.

    i've already had plenty of occasions where this or that movie that i randomly think of is not on any of the streaming sites. or is behind a premium hbo/starz/etc paywall. or have made it half way through a show only to find out i only have a month to finish because it's going offline.

    That's part of the problem. Also (not as often), sometimes streaming services can be unavailable due to high traffic or other problems, or sometimes your internet service might go down.

    In a way, relying on streaming services for everything seems like relying on over-the-air broadcasts. You have to wait for something to become available, and then as you said, it can be taken away later. I always thought that's one of the reasons they started producing movies & TV shows that people could buy and own. Now, it seems many people are content with relying on streaming services for the things they want to watch.

    Nightfox

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com
  • From Nightfox@VERT/DIGDIST to Arelor on Sat Mar 20 11:11:30 2021
    Re: Re: HD vs 4K
    By: Arelor to fusion on Fri Mar 19 2021 09:13 am

    You know, I once heard that if you had well preserved master films in 25mm, those still beat modern digital recordings (even films from the 1920s) and benefit when upgraded from mpeg 4 to an HD capable format.

    I think one of the advantages of analog film is that it doesn't really have a set video resolution like digital displays do. You can always re-scan the film in a higher resolution - though I think after a certain point it will start to look bad. On the other hand, if you record a movie in a digital format, it's at a specific fixed resolution, and upscaling will be more tricky.

    Some people seem to think old analog film means poor quality and low resolution, but that's not true.

    Nightfox

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com
  • From Arelor@VERT/PALANT to Nightfox on Sat Mar 20 14:55:59 2021
    Re: Re: HD vs 4K
    By: Nightfox to fusion on Sat Mar 20 2021 11:02 am

    Re: Re: HD vs 4K
    By: fusion to Nightfox on Fri Mar 19 2021 06:52 pm

    Personally, I still sometimes like to buy movies to own.

    i've already had plenty of occasions where this or that movie that i randomly think of is n
    on any of the streaming sites. or is behind a premium hbo/starz/etc paywall. or have made i
    half way through a show only to find out i only have a month to finish because it's going
    offline.

    That's part of the problem. Also (not as often), sometimes streaming services can be unavailabl
    due to high traffic or other problems, or sometimes your internet service might go down.

    In a way, relying on streaming services for everything seems like relying on over-the-air
    broadcasts. You have to wait for something to become available, and then as you said, it can be
    taken away later. I always thought that's one of the reasons they started producing movies & TV
    shows that people could buy and own. Now, it seems many people are content with relying on
    streaming services for the things they want to watch.

    Nightfox


    Streaming services have made content over-abundant. and therefore less valuable.

    30 years ago it made sense to own _that_ special movie you wanted in VHS, because there weren't so
    many TV channels providing quality films and shows in an abundant way. Nowadays, if _that_ film is
    not available, you are bound to find three hundred to substitute it at no cost (or close). There is
    no specific reason to own your own copy of things because their value has gone under, unless you
    are a hardcore like me and want to reduce your dependence on content providers.

    --
    gopher://gopher.richardfalken.com/1/richardfalken

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Palantir BBS * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL
  • From Linuxdan@VERT/DMINE to Nightfox on Fri Mar 19 19:49:00 2021
    Nightfox wrote to The Millionaire <=-

    Personally, I still sometimes like to buy movies to own.

    I like to own them so that I can watch them when I want - without
    worrying about them being romoved from the streaming service and
    put in some imaginary "vault" or having them removed entirely
    because some group is offended by the content of a movie that was
    released in a different time, to a different generation. Yeah, I just
    want to make sure I can always watch my movies when I want. :-)


    ... May your best yesterday be better than your worst today.
    --- MultiMail/DOS v0.52
    þ Synchronet þ Diamond Mine Online BBS - bbs.dmine.net:24 - Fredericksburg, VA USA
  • From Nightfox@VERT/DIGDIST to Arelor on Sun Mar 21 10:54:22 2021
    Re: Re: HD vs 4K
    By: Arelor to Nightfox on Sat Mar 20 2021 02:55 pm

    30 years ago it made sense to own _that_ special movie you wanted in VHS, because there weren't so many TV channels providing quality films and shows in an abundant way. Nowadays, if _that_ film is not available, you are bound to find three hundred to substitute it at no cost (or close).

    If you want to watch a particular movie, I don't think anything else can substitute for it. You could choose another movie to watch, but it won't be the one you originally wanted to watch..

    There is no specific reason to own your own copy of things because their value has gone under, unless you are a hardcore like me and want to reduce your dependence on content providers.

    I also don't want to fully depend on content providers.

    Nightfox

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com
  • From Arelor@VERT/PALANT to Nightfox on Sun Mar 21 14:23:21 2021
    Re: Re: HD vs 4K
    By: Nightfox to Arelor on Sun Mar 21 2021 10:54 am

    30 years ago it made sense to own _that_ special movie you wanted in VH because there weren't so many TV channels providing quality films and shows in an abundant way. Nowadays, if _that_ film is not available, yo are bound to find three hundred to substitute it at no cost (or close).

    If you want to watch a particular movie, I don't think anything else can substitute for it. You could choose another movie to watch, but it won't be the one you originally wanted to watch..


    For a certain set of people, like you and me, if they want something specific, they want _that_ specific thing to watch. However, I have observed that people with access to vast ammounts of films just don't give a damn. They will gather with friends, fire up $service, and if the film they want to watch is not there, they will watch something else without breaking a sweat in the least.

    --
    gopher://gopher.richardfalken.com/1/richardfalken

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Palantir BBS * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL
  • From Ogg@VERT/CAPCITY2 to HusTler on Wed Mar 24 20:37:00 2021
    Hello HusTler!

    ** On Wednesday 24.03.21 - 07:48, HusTler wrote to Tracker1:

    Now I know who to contact with my ripping questions. I
    recently purchased an external DVD r+w and made a few
    copies for a friend. One of the copies crapped out a 23
    mins. What causes this? Bad disk?

    I have found that I get better success if I limit burn to DVDRW
    at 4X max.

    My units are internal to DT or laptop. In my case I would
    usually encounter failures while I was using the pc for browsing
    or file searching while a burn was taking place.


    --- OpenXP 5.0.49
    * Origin: Ogg's Dovenet Point (723:320/1.9)
    þ Synchronet þ CAPCITY2 * capcity2.synchro.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/Rlogin/HTTP
  • From Nightfox@VERT/DIGDIST to Tracker1 on Wed Mar 24 18:33:41 2021
    Re: Re: HD vs 4K
    By: Tracker1 to poindexter FORTRAN on Wed Mar 24 2021 02:42 am

    Weird.. if you have a desktop or server that's always on, may be worth setting up a plex server that can transcode to h264 for you... this way you can still store in the smaller (size wise) format.

    A while ago, I bought the Lifetime Pass for Plex when it was on sale. I read one of the features of Plex Pass is that it can make use of a GPU for transcoding. My BBS/Plex PC is using the Intel graphics on the CPU, and I've thought of buying an inexpensive GPU for it so it can transcode easier. But currently my only TV now can play h.265, so it hasn't been a problem.

    At the same time, I wondered why they don't implement h.265 decoding in the Plex player app. I thought smart TVs these days would generally have a processor fast enough to decode even that video codec, but maybe not.

    Nightfox

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com
  • From Nightfox@VERT/DIGDIST to Tracker1 on Wed Mar 24 18:36:41 2021
    Re: Re: HD vs 4K
    By: Tracker1 to poindexter FORTRAN on Wed Mar 24 2021 02:47 am

    I go through similar about once a month... sometimes I'll just pay the $4-7 rental price to not deal with the hassle, but at $15+ for a 20yo movie, I'd rather just download it.

    I don't think it really matters how old the movie is. If it's a movie I like, I might be willing to spend the money to buy it on blu-ray or something. They can restore old movies fairly well.

    Sometimes the price seems a bit high though. I've seen 4K releases of the original Star Wars trilogy, but they're priced at about $28 each which seems a bit steep.

    As much as I like to buy & own movies I like, over the years I've realized I rarely watch them, so sometimes I think more about whether I really want to buy them or not.

    Nightfox

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com
  • From Nightfox@VERT/DIGDIST to fusion on Wed Mar 24 18:46:22 2021
    Re: Re: HD vs 4K
    By: fusion to Tracker1 on Wed Mar 24 2021 09:21 am

    i paid for the movie "Water World" on dvd because nobody had ripped it at the time (at least that i could find. it was a long long time ago. it's NOT a wildly popular movie by any stretch lol).

    I remember hearing that was the most expensive movie to produce when it came out. And it wasn't even that great.

    nowadays even hot garbage is fairly easy to find with a handful of seeders.

    Sometimes I wonder why that is, and other good media can be so hard to find.

    Nightfox

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com
  • From MRO@VERT/BBSESINF to poindexter FORTRAN on Wed Mar 24 22:09:48 2021
    Re: Re: HD vs 4K
    By: poindexter FORTRAN to Tracker1 on Tue Mar 23 2021 07:32 am

    mp4 is a container format, often h.264 aka AVC for 1080p or lower for video. 4K is still mp4 as the container format but h.265 aka HEVC for the encoding. HEVC has a better, imho, rendering degradation when over-compressed (blurry vs blocky).

    I'm a newbie at all of this, but noticed that my 4K Roku TV doesn't support h.265 encoded video, only h.264. I have to be careful what I try to play on it.


    why do you think that and what do you mean about what you play on it.
    i have a 4k roku stick and it plays HEVC

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ ::: BBSES.info - free BBS services :::
  • From Tracker1@VERT/TRN to fusion on Wed Mar 24 16:33:07 2021
    On 3/24/2021 2:18 AM, fusion wrote:
    better/faster in the next generation or two... Radeon and NVidia
    cards are so much faster, but the quality/size worse than CPU, I
    still choose CPU encodes, just takes forever... I'll sometimes
    have days worth of encodes queued up that would be a couple hours
    with hardware.

    that isn't the use case they intended for those cards.. they're
    great for live streaming.. but i duno why video editing software
    likes to default to using them.. :/

    Because a couple minutes is a lot faster than a few hours, and
    depending on what you are doing, you can get it good enough at higher
    disk usage and get it done more quickly, still saving a bunch of space
    over the original/raw files. Or getting it small enough to send to
    YouTube that will re-encode the damned thing anyway.

    I get it... but for distro/archive, it's not necessarily the best
    option. It's only that CPU encodes take so much longer.
    --
    Michael J. Ryan - tracker1@roughneckbbs.com
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Roughneck BBS - roughneckbbs.com
  • From Tracker1@VERT/TRN to HusTler on Wed Mar 24 16:37:18 2021
    On 3/24/2021 4:48 AM, HusTler wrote:
    Most of what I'm up for ripping myself is stuff that I cannot get in
    higher definition anyway, or otherwise is unavailable in torrents. I do
    buy some things because I want to support certain actions, and money
    talks, even if mine is a drop in the bucket.

    Now I know who to contact with my ripping questions. I recently
    purchased an external DVD r+w and made a few copies for a friend.
    One of the copies crapped out a 23 mins. What causes this? Bad disk?

    Not sure... I've had issues with a couple disks here and there, likely
    an error that may not show up on a real BR player. I have bought AnyDVD
    HD as well as MakeMKV usually one or the other, I can get a clean rip to
    my HD.

    Will usually then re-encode with Handbrake using mkv container and
    h.265, if the original audio isn't too big, I'll leave it as-is, or
    recompress to 64kbps per channel aac.

    I'm nowhere near an expert... there's scene guys that are way active,
    I'm just a hobbyist doing his own media now and then.
    --
    Michael J. Ryan - tracker1@roughneckbbs.com
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Roughneck BBS - roughneckbbs.com
  • From Tracker1@VERT/TRN to Nightfox on Wed Mar 24 16:39:34 2021
    On 3/24/2021 8:30 AM, Nightfox wrote:
    Likely a lack of hardware decoding on chip... when 4k streaming
    devices first came out, h.265 was still really new and a lot of
    chips on those devices didn't have hardware decoders (and they're
    all too slow for software decoding). For those things, if you have
    a desktop/server online, best to setup a plex server.

    Yeah, I have a Plex server at home. I had one TV that seemed to
    have trouble with h.265 even through the Plex app, but another TV
    where h.265 seemed to play without any problems.

    Wild, haven't really had any/many issues... though tbh, most of my
    own playback is on the Shield TV with Kodi over CIFS/SMB shares directly.
    --
    Michael J. Ryan - tracker1@roughneckbbs.com
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Roughneck BBS - roughneckbbs.com
  • From Dumas Walker@VERT/CAPCITY2 to TRACKER1 on Thu Mar 25 15:40:00 2021
    Not sure... I've had issues with a couple disks here and there, likely
    an error that may not show up on a real BR player. I have bought AnyDVD
    HD as well as MakeMKV usually one or the other, I can get a clean rip to
    my HD.

    I recently bought a DVD set that says that it is "made for DVD players and
    may not play on PC drives." As advertised, I am not able to watch, or rip, that one except watching on a DVD player (an XBOX).

    Will usually then re-encode with Handbrake using mkv container and
    h.265, if the original audio isn't too big, I'll leave it as-is, or recompress to 64kbps per channel aac.

    I rip using handbrake on a linux system.


    * SLMR 2.1a * Oxymoron: Hillary Rodham Clinton and open-door meetings.

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ CAPCITY2 * capcity2.synchro.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/Rlogin/HTTP
  • From Ogg@VERT/CAPCITY2 to Dumas Walker on Thu Mar 25 18:27:00 2021
    Hello Dumas!

    ** On Thursday 25.03.21 - 15:40, Dumas Walker wrote to TRACKER1:

    I recently bought a DVD set that says that it is "made for
    DVD players andmay not play on PC drives." As advertised,
    I am not able to watch, or rip, that one except watching on
    a DVD player (an XBOX).

    That is an interesting reversal. I always thought that and PC's
    DVD player could do anything. What is this "set" that you
    bought?



    --- OpenXP 5.0.49
    * Origin: Ogg's Dovenet Point (723:320/1.9)
    þ Synchronet þ CAPCITY2 * capcity2.synchro.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/Rlogin/HTTP
  • From Nightfox@VERT/DIGDIST to Dumas Walker on Thu Mar 25 20:20:20 2021
    Re: Re: HD vs 4K
    By: Dumas Walker to TRACKER1 on Thu Mar 25 2021 03:40 pm

    I recently bought a DVD set that says that it is "made for DVD players and may not play on PC drives." As advertised, I am not able to watch, or rip, that one except watching on a DVD player (an XBOX).

    I wonder how that works. I know DVDs have copy protection, but anything that is capable of playing a DVD (including a PC with a DVD drive and compatible software) should be able to at least play it. I haven't had a DVD that I was unable to play in a PC.

    There's software that can rip a DVD, even with copy protection. I heard DVD copy protection was cracked fairly soon. I've been able to rip any of my DVDs using DVD Shrink (which makes ISOs of DVDs, and can either shrink it to a 4.7GB DVD-R or keep it full-size for a 9.4GB DVD-R). There's a lot of other ripping software that can rip it to a video file too.

    Nightfox

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Digital Distortion: digitaldistortionbbs.com
  • From Arelor@VERT/PALANT to Ogg on Fri Mar 26 03:43:42 2021
    Re: HD vs 4K
    By: Ogg to Dumas Walker on Thu Mar 25 2021 06:27 pm

    Hello Dumas!

    ** On Thursday 25.03.21 - 15:40, Dumas Walker wrote to TRACKER1:

    I recently bought a DVD set that says that it is "made for
    DVD players andmay not play on PC drives." As advertised,
    I am not able to watch, or rip, that one except watching on
    a DVD player (an XBOX).

    That is an interesting reversal. I always thought that and PC's
    DVD player could do anything. What is this "set" that you
    bought?

    I am not a media expert, but some DVDs employ obscure features as to make it harder for desktop software to support it.

    For example, Disney DVDs have the chapters stored in a scrambled order, so if you rip the DVD straight ahead or play it
    directly you won't get to watch the movie properly.

    Which is yet another reason not to purchase a Disney product.

    --
    gopher://gopher.richardfalken.com/1/richardfalken

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Palantir BBS * palantirbbs.ddns.net * Pensacola, FL
  • From Ogg@VERT/CAPCITY2 to Arelor on Fri Mar 26 09:38:00 2021
    Hello Arelor!

    ** On Friday 26.03.21 - 03:43, Arelor wrote to Ogg:

    I am not a media expert, but some DVDs employ obscure
    features as to make it harder for desktop software to
    support it.

    For example, Disney DVDs have the chapters stored in a
    scrambled order, so if you rip the DVD straight ahead or
    play it directly you won't get to watch the movie properly.

    I am guessing that Duma's set is BluRay? Maybe the BluRay spec
    can be manipulated like that.

    I've only ever worked with traditional DVDs and DVD Shrink has
    never encountered a problem with any of those.

    Which is yet another reason not to purchase a Disney product.

    But.. in a hypocritical way you can avoid buying Disney product
    but buy the stocks and get rich off of them. ;)


    --- OpenXP 5.0.49
    * Origin: Ogg's Dovenet Point (723:320/1.9)
    þ Synchronet þ CAPCITY2 * capcity2.synchro.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/Rlogin/HTTP
  • From Dumas Walker@VERT/CAPCITY2 to OGG on Fri Mar 26 10:26:00 2021
    ** On Thursday 25.03.21 - 15:40, Dumas Walker wrote to TRACKER1:

    I recently bought a DVD set that says that it is "made for
    DVD players andmay not play on PC drives." As advertised,
    I am not able to watch, or rip, that one except watching on
    a DVD player (an XBOX).

    That is an interesting reversal. I always thought that and PC's
    DVD player could do anything. What is this "set" that you
    bought?

    The Expanse Season 4. That is the first season it was on Amazon rather
    than on SyFy. I suspect Amazon allowed it to be put out on CD provided
    that it was crippled somehow to force people who might want to stream their
    own copy to have to stream it off their service instead.

    If I put it in the DVD player on the XBOX, it will bring up the menu and
    play every title. If I put it in the player on the PC, it will not bring
    up the menu, and I am only able to see and play the extras.


    * SLMR 2.1a * Bartenders DO IT on the rocks..

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ CAPCITY2 * capcity2.synchro.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/Rlogin/HTTP
  • From Tracker1@VERT/TRN to Nightfox on Fri Mar 26 10:00:38 2021
    On 3/24/2021 6:33 PM, Nightfox wrote:
    Weird.. if you have a desktop or server that's always on, may be
    worth setting up a plex server that can transcode to h264 for you...
    this way you can still store in the smaller (size wise) format.

    A while ago, I bought the Lifetime Pass for Plex when it was on sale.
    I read one of the features of Plex Pass is that it can make use of a
    GPU for transcoding. My BBS/Plex PC is using the Intel graphics on
    the CPU, and I've thought of buying an inexpensive GPU for it so it
    can transcode easier. But currently my only TV now can play h.265, so
    it hasn't been a problem.

    At the same time, I wondered why they don't implement h.265 decoding
    in the Plex player app. I thought smart TVs these days would
    generally have a processor fast enough to decode even that video
    codec, but maybe not.

    Yeah, most Integrated SOCs have a dedicated processing for media
    decoding, if they don't usually not powerful enough.
    --
    Michael J. Ryan - tracker1@roughneckbbs.com
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Roughneck BBS - roughneckbbs.com
  • From Tracker1@VERT/TRN to Ogg on Fri Mar 26 10:12:02 2021
    On 3/25/2021 3:27 PM, Ogg wrote:
    I recently bought a DVD set that says that it is "made for
    DVD players andmay not play on PC drives." As advertised,
    I am not able to watch, or rip, that one except watching on
    a DVD player (an XBOX).

    That is an interesting reversal. I always thought that and PC's
    DVD player could do anything. What is this "set" that you
    bought?

    Likely a DRM scheme that abuses standards for how tracks are laid out or something similar that manifests on PC players/rippers but not actual hardware... would be surprised if AnyDVD and MakeMKV don't have it circumvented.
    --
    Michael J. Ryan - tracker1@roughneckbbs.com
    ---
    þ Synchronet þ Roughneck BBS - roughneckbbs.com
  • From Dumas Walker@VERT/CAPCITY2 to NIGHTFOX on Fri Mar 26 15:50:00 2021
    I wonder how that works. I know DVDs have copy protection, but anything that i
    capable of playing a DVD (including a PC with a DVD drive and compatible softw
    re) should be able to at least play it. I haven't had a DVD that I was unable >o play in a PC.

    There's software that can rip a DVD, even with copy protection. I heard DVD co
    y protection was cracked fairly soon. I've been able to rip any of my DVDs usi
    g DVD Shrink (which makes ISOs of DVDs, and can either shrink it to a 4.7GB DVD
    R or keep it full-size for a 9.4GB DVD-R). There's a lot of other ripping soft
    are that can rip it to a video file too.

    I suspect they are employing some sort of scheme involving intentional bad sectors. ddrescue is not able to get a clean read of the disk. It also
    makes ISOs out of DVDs.


    * SLMR 2.1a * Camel: A quarter horse designed by a committee.

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ CAPCITY2 * capcity2.synchro.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/Rlogin/HTTP
  • From Dumas Walker@VERT/CAPCITY2 to OGG on Fri Mar 26 15:52:00 2021
    I am guessing that Duma's set is BluRay? Maybe the BluRay spec
    can be manipulated like that.

    No, it is a DVD set. I don't have a BluRay player.


    * SLMR 2.1a * I'm a nocturnal model

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ CAPCITY2 * capcity2.synchro.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/Rlogin/HTTP
  • From fusion@VERT/CFBBS to Tracker1 on Sat Mar 27 01:27:00 2021
    On 26 Mar 2021, Tracker1 said the following...
    Yeah, most Integrated SOCs have a dedicated processing for media decoding, if they don't usually not powerful enough.

    yeah i remember when netbooks first came out that was a pretty common upgrade. either people would remove something from inside the laptop to make space for it, or they would solder on to extra i/o on the board. yank the wifi card,
    put the decoder board where it was, solder in a usb wifi dongle.. lots of whacky stuff. it was kinda neat there for a bit though because homebrewing laptop stuff was a thing. i think that's mostly faded for now.

    --- Mystic BBS v1.12 A46 2020/08/26 (Windows/32)
    * Origin: cold fusion - cfbbs.net - grand rapids, mi
  • From Dumas Walker@VERT/CAPCITY2 to TRACKER1 on Sat Mar 27 11:03:00 2021
    That is an interesting reversal. I always thought that and PC's
    DVD player could do anything. What is this "set" that you
    bought?

    Likely a DRM scheme that abuses standards for how tracks are laid out or something similar that manifests on PC players/rippers but not actual hardware... would be surprised if AnyDVD and MakeMKV don't have it circumvented.

    Do either of these work on linux? I have been using handbrake, which does
    work on linux and will usually do the trick (but not with this DVD set).


    * SLMR 2.1a * The worst ice cream flavor is probably squirrel.

    ---
    þ Synchronet þ CAPCITY2 * capcity2.synchro.net * Telnet/SSH:2022/Rlogin/HTTP