I remember fussing in one of the echos about that last one only to be that Google Maps had turned off their "don't route through bad areas" because people complained it was not "politically correct" to do so.
When did it become "politically incorrect" to steer clear of danger? '-)
If an area is considered high crime or a place where people from outside the area are prey for the local gangs, that is a good enough explanation without going into the socio-economic or other conjecture based on race or culture. If there is a riot zone in my path, I don't care who it is or what they stand for. Chances are they have their opponents gathering on their borders and the entire area is a hot zone.
I think that Hustler and I are in agreement with you and do not
understand why Google Maps no longer helps people avoid high-crime areas.
Dumas Walker wrote to MOONDOG <=-
I think that Hustler and I are in agreement with you and do not
understand why Google Maps no longer helps people avoid high-crime
areas.
reas.I think that Hustler and I are in agreement with you and do not understand why Google Maps no longer helps people avoid high-crime
Just checked Seattle as example, but is not this kind of map and servicesabl
to address your question:ttps://crimegrade.org/safest-places-in-seattle-wa-m
ro/
I think that Hustler and I are in agreement with you and do not understand why Google Maps no longer helps people avoid high-crime areas.
It's not enough nowadays to have good intentions if an indication of
racism can be claimed. Most people don't read beyond the headline any
more, and so making a claim is sufficient proof for the unread.
Sysop: | Coz |
---|---|
Location: | Anoka, MN |
Users: | 2 |
Nodes: | 4 (0 / 4) |
Uptime: | 33:10:32 |
Calls: | 141 |
Files: | 5,058 |
Messages: | 220,699 |